2. 医学
  3. Back in 1896, the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius realized that by burning coal we were adding carbon dioxide to the air, and

Back in 1896, the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius realized that by burning coal we were adding carbon dioxide to the air, and

admin2021-11-29  1
问题     Back in 1896, the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius realized that by burning coal we were adding carbon dioxide to the air, and that this would warm the Earth. But he mentioned the issue only in passing (顺便地), for his calculations suggested it would not become a problem for thousands of years. Others thought that the oceans would soak up any extra CO2, so there was nothing much to worry about.
    That this latter argument has persisted to this day in some quarters highlights our species’ propensity (倾向) to underestimate the scale of our impact on the planet. Even the Earth’s vast oceans cannot suck up CO2 as quickly as we can produce it, and we now know the stored CO2 is acidifying the oceans, a problem in itself.
    Now a handful of researchers are warning that energy sources we normally think of as innocuous could affect the planet’s climate too. If we start to extract immense amounts of power from the wind. For instance, it will have an impact on how warmth and water move around the planet, and thus on temperatures and rainfall.
    Just to be clear, no one is suggesting we should stop building wind farms on the basis of this risk. Aside from the huge uncertainties about the climatic effects of extracting power from the wind, our present and near-term usage is far too tiny to make any difference. For the Moment, any negative consequences on the climate are massively outweighed by the effect of pumping out even more CO2. That poses by far the greater environmental threat; weaning ourselves off fossil fuels should remain the priority.
    Even so, now it is the time to start thinking about the long-term effects of the alternative energy sources we are turning to. Those who have already started to look at these issues report weary, indifferent or even hostile reactions to their work.
    That’s understandable, but disappointing. These effects may be inconsequential, in which case all that will have been wasted is some research time that may well yield interesting insights anyway. Or they may turn out to be sharply negative, in which case the more notice we have, the better. It would be unfortunate to put it mildly, to spend countless trillions replacing fossil-fuel energy infrastructure (基础建设) only to discover that its successor (替代物) is also more damaging than it need be.
    These climatic effects may even be beneficial. The first, tentative models suggest that extracting large amounts of energy from high-altitude jet streams would cool the planet, counteracting the effects of rising greenhouse gases. It might even be possible to build an energy infrastructure that gives us a degree of control over the weather: turning off wind turbines here, capturing more of the sun ‘energy here.
    We may also need to rethink our long-term research priorities. The sun is ultimately the only source of energy that doesn’t end up altering the planet’s energy balance. So the best bet might be invest heavily in improving solar technology and energy storage — rather than in efforts to harness, say, nuclear fusion.
    For the moment, all of this remains supposition (推测). But our species has a tendency to myopia. We have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by taking the long view for a change.
According to the author, the best strategy is________.
选项 A、to counteract the effects of rising greenhouse gases
B、to develop a degree of control over the weather
C、to extract large amounts of energy from wind
D、to explore solar energy and its storage
答案D
解析 细节题。用best strategy回到原文定位到倒数第二段：So the best bet might be invest heavily in improving solar technology and energy storage-rather than in efforts to harness，say.nuclear fusion，D选项(开发太阳能及其储备)是原文的正确改写。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3BH3777K
本试题收录于： 医学博士外语题库考研分类
0

医学博士外语

考研

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)