首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
59
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
Despite the possibility of introduction of a gene into a particular plant at one time and location, the author contends that such extreme caution about genetic technology is unwarranted because______.
选项
A、there are regulatory committees
B、in labs gene ferrying is being applied and controlled stringently
C、genetic engineering is far more precise than the natural gene movement
D、the possibility of such an event is too small
答案
C
解析
从第十一段Genetic engineering is far more precise than the gene movements which occurin nature可直接找出答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2CU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
女性,62岁,突发胸痛2小时入院。心电图V1-5ST段抬高。弓背向上,即抽血查CK-MB轻微升高,达不到心肌梗死的诊断标准。请示上级医生,认为急性心肌梗死的可能性最大,有关心肌酶值的测定,以下哪项是错的
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Confrontedwithpatientfacingdeath,physiciansmayfeelasenseofmedicalimpotenceandfailure.Yearsoftrainingandzealt
Confrontedwithpatientfacingdeath,physiciansmayfeelasenseofmedicalimpotenceandfailure.Yearsoftrainingandzealt
Rainisnotwhatitusedtobe.AnewstudyrevealsthatmuchoftheprecipitationinEuropecontainssuchhighlevelsofdissol
Whydopeoplealwayswanttogetupanddancewhentheyhearmusic?Theusualexplanationisthatthereissomethingembeddedin
A、Hehatesthosewhofoolaround.B、Hewillnevertrythestuff.C、Hewillshootanydrugdealer.D、Heregretshavingtriedthe
Duringthepast30yearsorso,healthcarehasincreasinglybecomeaformofbusiness.Inaddition,theenvironmentsurroundin
ThismonthSingaporepassedabillthatwouldgivelegalteethtothemoralobligationtosupportone’sparents.CalledtheMain
随机试题
切除肾上腺引起动物死亡的原因,主要是由于缺乏()
诊断首先考虑对该患者PPD试验结果的解释哪项是错误的
鼻咽癌如有下列哪组淋巴结受累需包括在GTVnx范围内
患者,女,72岁。多次中段尿培养为大肠埃希茵生长,但无尿路刺激症状,应给予的治疗为
关于罪数的认定,下列哪些选项是正确的?
预作用装置压力表读数不在正常范围,其故障处理方式有()。
企业的生产计划一般分为()层次。
一段画面尺寸为352像素×288像素,24位色彩,播放速度为25帧/秒,共10分钟的无声视频,如果没有经过压缩,则存储容量大约为()。
简述穆罕默德.阿里改革的内容和影响。(北京大学2013历史学基础(世界史)真题)
WashingtonfeltuncomfortableinCongressdebatesbecausehe______.
最新回复
(
0
)