首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
52
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT _______.
选项
A、political power
B、high fares
C、economic loss
D、indifference
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/48tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thesecretaryandheadmasteroftheschool______presentatthemeeting.
IfyouhavereallybeenlivinginFranceforsomanyyears,it’sabouttimeyou______abletotalkwithpeopleinFrench.
WhichofthefollowingitalicizedpartsdoesNOTindicateresult?
Thenewlybuiltschoolofferscoursesineverysubject_______.
Inthesentence"Shewalksoutofthehouse,followedbyalittleboy",thepastparticipleisusedas
Weallseeandhearaboutextraordinarypeoplearoundusandwonderwhywecan’tbemorelikethem.Sometimeswechuckthatnoti
Thecompanyhascapitalized______theerrorofjudgmentmadebyitsbusinesscompetitor.
Incertainarea,duringcertainperiod,thedevelopmentofcommunicationcould_______theproductionandlifeofthesociety.
PASSAGETHREEWhatisthepurposeofthewriterinwritingthispassage?
随机试题
疾病的流行是
甲市检察院对王某故意杀人一案提起了公诉,甲市中级人民法院审查后认为该案不属于自己管辖的范围,应当如何处理?()
海水环境港口与航道工程混凝土的部位可分为()。
承包人合同管理的程序包括:①合同综合评价;②合同订立;③合同实施控制;④合同评审;⑤合同实施计划。正确的顺序为()。
以下哪个选项最贴切地描述了因有基准价格而存在较小价格不确定性的公开募股?
薪酬设计的原则不包括()。
甲、乙、丙共同出资设立一个普通合伙企业,在合伙企业存续期间,甲拟以其在合伙企业中的财产份额出质借款。根据合伙企业法律制度的规定,下列表述中正确的有()。
根据个人所得税法律制度的规定,下列关于居民个人综合所得表述,正确的有()。
有一批总进价为2000元的橙子,其中大橙子300千克且大小橙子按照统一单位进价进货。现有两种售卖方案:甲方案为大橙子按单位进价的2倍出售,小橙子按单位进价的1.1倍出售;乙方案为所有橙子均按甲方案大、小橙子售价的平均数直接出售。若按甲方案将橙子全部卖完,可
把下面的六个图形分为两类,使每一类图形都有各自的共同特征或规律,分类正确的一项是:
最新回复
(
0
)