首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Imagine you’re an employer, looking to hire me for a job. You subscribe to a Web site that gives you background information, and
Imagine you’re an employer, looking to hire me for a job. You subscribe to a Web site that gives you background information, and
admin
2014-12-11
36
问题
Imagine you’re an employer, looking to hire me for a job. You subscribe to a Web site that gives you background information, and this is what you find. Jessica Rose Bennett, 29, spends 30 hours a week on social-networking sites — while at work. She is an excessive drinker, a drug user, and sexually promiscuous. She swears a lot, and spends way beyond her means shopping online. Her writing ability? Superior. Cost to hire? Cheap.
In reality, only part of this is true: yes, I like a good bourbon. But drugs? That conies from my reporting projects — and one in particular that took me to a pot farm in California. The promiscuity? My boyfriend of five years would beg to differ on that, but I did once write a story about polyamory. I do spend hours on social-networking sites, but it’s part of my job. And I’m not nearly as cheap to hire as the Web would have you believe. (Take note, future employers!)
The irony, of course, is that if this were a real job search, none of this would matter — I’d have already lost the job. But this is the kind of information surmisable to anybody with a Web connection and a bit of background data, who wants to take the time to compile it all. For this particular experiment, we asked ReputationDefender, a company that works to keep information like this private, to do a scrub of the Web, with nothing but my (very common) name and e-mail address to go on. Three Silicon Valley engineers, several decades of experience, and access to publicly available databases like Spokeo, Facebook, and LinkedIn (no, they didn’t do any hacking)—and voila. Within 30 minutes, the company had my Social Security number; in two hours, they knew where I lived, my body type, my hometown, and my health status. (Note: this isn’t part of Reputation Defender’s service; they did the search — and accompanying graphic — exclusively for Newsweek, to show how much about a person is out there for the taking.)
It’s scary stuff, but scarier when you realize it’s the kind of information that credit-card companies and data aggregators are already selling, for pennies, to advertisers every day. Or that it’s the kind of data, as The Wall Street Journal revealed last week, that’s being blasted to third parties when you download certain apps on Facebook. (Under close watch by Congress, Facebook has said it’s working to "dramatically limit" its users’ personal exposure.) "Most people are still under the illusion that when they go online, they’re anonymous," says Nicholas Carr, the author of The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. "But in reality, every move they make is being collected into a database."
This, say tech experts, is the credit score of the future — a kind of aggregated ranking for every aspect of your life. It’s an assessment that goes beyond the limits of targeted advertising — you know, those pesky shoe banners that follow a visit to Zappos, made possible by tracking devices we know as "cookies" — by making use of the data in ways that are more personal and, potentially, damaging. Think HMOs, loan applications, romantic partners. Let’s say you’ve been hitting up a burger joint twice a week, and you happen to joke, in a post on Twitter, how all the meat must be wreaking havoc on your cholesterol. Suddenly your health-insurance premiums go up. Now imagine your job is listed on Salary.com; your vacation preferences linked to Orbitz. Think how this could affect your social standing, or your ability to negotiate a raise or apply for a loan. Finally, what if you could know, based on Web history and location tracking, that a prospective mate had a communicable disease. Wouldn’t you pay to find out? "Most of us just don’t realize the potential consequences of this," says Lorrie Cranor, a Web-privacy expert at Carnegie Mellon University.
Which of the following is within the business line of ReputationDefender?
选项
A、To supply technical support to Internet users.
B、To provide legal service to defend one’s reputation.
C、To protect people’s personal information.
D、To do research and graphic for Newsweek.
答案
C
解析
根据第三段第三句,ReputationDefender是一家保障信息隐私的公司,[C]是其同义转述。第三段第四句话提到来自ReputationDefender公司的三位工程师,说明这个公司确实是搞技术的,但并不是为网络用户提供技术支持的,[A]错误。[B]的错误在于其望文生义。第三段最后一句说ReputationDefender为Newsweek做这个实验,只是为了验证一下通过这些渠道能够获得多少个人信息,并不是说ReputationDefender这个公司就是专为Newsweek作检索,画图表的,排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4VdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhencatastrophicfloodshitBangladesh,TNT’semergency-responseteamwasready.Thelogisticsgiant,withheadquartersinAmst
WhencatastrophicfloodshitBangladesh,TNT’semergency-responseteamwasready.Thelogisticsgiant,withheadquartersinAmst
Tensionshaveflaredbecause
WhatsuggestiondoesMs.LiongivetothestudentsusingInternetasaninformationsource?
_____isoneofShakespeare’snarrativepoems.
Cellscannotremainaliveoutsidecertainlimitsoftemperatureandmuchnarrowerlimitsmarktheboundariesofeffectivefunc
PositiveforYouthaimstoplaceteenagersandyoungpeopleatitsheart.Thereistheaccurateexpectationteenagersthemselves
ThefiveallegedRussianspiesinUkraineweresupposedto
TheRussianairliner
TheRussianairliner
随机试题
如果一个数学测验试题的文字难度太大,超过学生自身的水平,那么这个测验就是()
煮沸消毒时,为提高沸点达到105℃,促进杀灭芽胞,防止金属器皿生锈,一般在水中加入
喜好网球和游泳的赵某从宏大公司购买某小区商品房一套,交房时发现购房时宏大公司售楼部所展示的该小区模型中的网球场和游泳池并不存在。经查,该小区设计中并无网球场和游泳池。下列哪些选项是正确的?(2008—卷三—54,多)
某交通局局长胡某,因涉嫌贪污、受贿、挪用公款等多项罪名而被人民检察院立案侦查并羁押。在侦查期间,胡某聘请了律师刘某为其提供法律帮助。在本案中,有权为胡某申请取保候审的人员有:()
自2012年初以来,A公司出现不能清偿到期债务,且资产不足清偿全部债务的情况。2012年12月17日,人民法院经审查裁定受理了A公司的破产申请,并指定了管理人。在该破产案件中,存在下述情况:(1)2011年10月8日,B公司向C银行借款1000万元,期限
下列事件不符合科学依据的是()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力、解决问题能力、语言表达能力的测试。2.作答参考时限:阅读材料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定材料
一个人早上从甲地骑自行车,每小时行走10千米,下午1点到达了乙地;没做停留他直接返回甲地,每小时15千米,结果在下午3点40分的时候返回了甲地。这个人第二天早上还是从甲地骑自行车到乙地,相比第一天早上,晚出发了50分钟,但将速度提高了25%,那么他到达乙地
Sincethedawnofhumaningenuity,peoplehavedevisedevermorecunningtoolstocopewithworkthatisdangerous,boring,burd
A、Whenit’stotallyunlikelytocausedeaths.B、Whenit’saround35%likelihoodofbetweenoneandtendeaths.C、Whenit’saroun
最新回复
(
0
)