首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
26
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
参考文章第二段,可知作者认为学生有能力评判教师的讲课水平。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/56iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
Yourbody,whichhascloserelationswiththefoodyoueat,isthemostimportantthingyouown,soitneedspropertreatmentan
—Wastheclasslongenough?—No,itwash’t______enough.
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Thereis______sugar.Youneedn’tgotobuyany.
随机试题
假象同真相一样,也是客观存在的。这是一种()
铣床夹具上的对刀装置起引导刀具作用,故称为导向件。()
简述企业的含义。
函数f(x)=在点x=1处()
设向量组α1,α2,α3线性无关,则下列向量组中,线性无关的是()。
屏幕阅读与在线阅读的兴起,以及海量信息的便捷搜索,使人们的阅读呈现出“浅阅读”的特征。即时的在线浏览取代了传统的青灯黄卷式的经典阅读。快餐式、浏览式、随意性、跳跃性、碎片化的阅读是典型的浅阅读。其实不仅在网络阅读中存在较为突出的浅阅读现象,纸面阅读中的浅阅
1995年,长江的各种船只开始实行分道航行,像汽车在高速公路上行驶一样,上行与下行互不干扰,其主要原因是()
根据承兑人的不同可以把汇票分为银行汇票和商业汇票。()[暨南大学2011国际商务硕士]
某大学对非英语专业的基础英语教学进行了改革。英语教师可以自行选择教材,可以删掉其中部分章节,同时也可以加入他们自己选择的材料。上述改革最不利于实现下面哪项目标?
NaturalandSyntheticRubberPeoplegetnaturalrubberfromrubbertrees/asawhite,milkyliquid,whichiscalledlatex.
最新回复
(
0
)