2. 外语
  3. (59) Three Google executives were convicted Wednesday of violating Italian privacy laws in a ruling that the company denounced a

(59) Three Google executives were convicted Wednesday of violating Italian privacy laws in a ruling that the company denounced a

admin2012-12-26  29
问题     (59) Three Google executives were convicted Wednesday of violating Italian privacy laws in a ruling that the company denounced as an "astonishing" attack at freedom of expression on the Internet.
    (60) The case involves online videos showing an autistic boy being bullied with classmates in Turin, which were posted in 2006 on Google Video, an online video-sharing service that Google ran before its acquisition of You Tube.
    (61) Prosecutors charged that the videos violated Italian personal private protections.
    (62) They said the clips were moved only after complaints from Vivi Down, an Italian organization representing people with Down syndrome and autism, whose name was mentioned in the videos.
    (63) "We are definitely satisfied that someone has to take responsibility for this viola-ting of privacy," said Guido Camera, a lawyer for Vivi Down.
    (64) Google said it planed to appeal, warned that the verdicts raised serious questions about the viability of user-generated content platforms like YouTube in Italy and potentially elsewhere in Europe.
    (65) "If company employee like me can be held criminally liable for any video on a hosting platform, (66) when they had absolute nothing to do with the video in question, (67) then our liability is limited," said one of the three executives, Peter Fleischer, Google’s chief privacy counsel.
    (68) "The decision today therefore raises broader questions as like the continued operation of many Internet platforms that are the essential foundations of freedom of expression in the digital age," he said in a statement.
    Video-sharing services like Google Video and You Tube generally rely on users to notify them of potentially problematic content, which is then taken down if it violates the terms of service.
选项
答案将介词at改为on
解析 attack on sth．是固定搭配，意为“对……的进攻，抨击”。后半部分句子大意：裁决指出该公司被指控在互联网上“大肆”干涉他人言论自由。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5J9O777K
0

考博英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)