首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
From this lecture, what can be inferred about the relationship between nurture and language acquisition?
From this lecture, what can be inferred about the relationship between nurture and language acquisition?
admin
2013-04-25
48
问题
From this lecture, what can be inferred about the relationship between nurture and language acquisition?
Do you think we’re born with the skills to learn a language, or do you believe that we develop language skills through social interaction? You’ve read ... at least I hope you’ve read the reading assignment Language and the Mind by Noam Chomsky. So you’re familiar with his argument that we’re born with a device that helps us acquire a language intuitively. He calls it a language acquisition device, or LAD, for short. But psychologists like Jerome Bruner are highly critical of his theory, so today we’re going to examine both sides of the debate.
In reality, the dispute is connected to the broader debate of nature versus nurture. What do I mean by nature and nurture? Well, let me ask it this way. Is language development controlled by biology, or do we learn from our social environment? Think about these questions and then I’ll ask your opinion again at the end of the lecture, okay? But before examining Chomksy’s theory, I need to clarify one point first. Our discussion today will focus on the acquisition of a child’s first language, or mother tongue, as it is sometimes called. And more about that term later, let’s begin by discussing what Mr. Chomsky has to say about language development.
Well, his language acquisition device or LAD theory is based on three key assumptions about the process. The first assumption is that children have an innate ability for language development. In other words, they’re born with a set of skills that allows them to intuitively comprehend language. In fact, Chomsky claims that their brains are preprogrammed with what he calls a ’universal grammar.’ And that device allows them to understand the =~ structure and grammar of a language just by being exposed to it. Let me elaborate on this point. From Chomsky’s perspective, a child’s brain is like a computer. It has already been wired to process and store different kinds of information. Do you see what I mean? Yes? Good! Now this hypothesis leads us to the second assumption: young children can acquire their first language skills independently. That is to say, they don’t have to rely on parents or the social environment to teach them the grammar and structure of their language; they simply use the LAD to figure it out for themselves. The third assumption is that the LAD makes it easy for young children to learn a language.
However, Chomsky does admit that there’s a small window of opportunity for language development. He thinks, or rather he refers to this short time period as the ’critical period.’ And a recent study of language development in feral children--the children who’ve grown up in extreme isolation from humans--has provided persuasive evidence of the notion of a critical period. For example, when they were found, feral children couldn’t speak at all. In fact, they could only make grunting noises like animals. That’s why they’re called ’feral’. It literally means untamed or wild. In any case, researchers discovered that when these children returned to normal living conditions, they had great difficulty acquiring language unless they were exposed to language before the age of twelve. The argument was that the brains of these abused children hadn’t developed neurologically, so the LAD couldn’t function properly. You can read about the actual feral experiences of a young girl in the book, Genie: A Scientific Tragedy. But getting back to the issue at hand, as you can see from this discussion, Chomksy’s LAD theory leans heavily toward the nature side of the debate. In other words, he and other linguists who support this theory believe that biology predetermines our ability to acquire language. And you’ll notice that the LAD theory focuses on acquiring language, not learning it. But psychologists like Jerome Brunet argue that language development is also a learning process.
So what’s the difference between acquiring a language and learning it? Well, for one thing, learning a language requires ongoing social interaction, and that assumption forms the basis of Bruner’s theory of the ’language acquisition support system’, or LASS, for short. You see, according to Bruner, some type of LAD may exist, but parents and siblings also play a key role in a child’s language development. How? By involving young children in routine behaviors like saying ’hello’ and ’goodbye’ and daily rituals like meal times and bath times. So it’s probably no surprise that the expression ’mother tongue’ evolved. After all, we all remember listening to the familiar sounds and repetitive phrases our mothers used when we were young. In fact, a researcher named Moerk nicknamed this type of language modeling as ’motherese.’ The second assumption of Bruner’s theory is that language learning is developmental. In other words, parents or siblings create a learning environment that supports the child as he or she builds language skills. So in the beginning, they are quite vocal and the child is rather passive. But as children develop the language skills, they become more active. From this perspective, language learning is more a process of discovery, and children learn to construct new ideas by linking it with previous knowledge and experiences. Therefore, it’s evident that Bruner’s theory strongly supports the notion that nurture is as essential as nature in language development. Now based on what you’ve heard today, where do you stand?
P And a recent study of language development in feral children--the children who’ve grown up in extreme isolation from humans--has provided persuasive evidence of the notion of a critical period.
What does the professor imply about the idea of a critical period?
选项
A、Preschoolers’ interaction with adults has no effect on their communication skills.
B、Toddlers are unable to communicate because they haven’t learned the rules of grammar yet.
C、Babies should be exposed to situations where language is modeled so that they can learn to use it.
D、Children who imitate sounds or words are not really communicating meanin
答案
C
解析
推理题 因为问题里出现了nurture(后天)这个词,因此要以布鲁纳的理论为根据来推断。布鲁纳的理论重视在孩子语言发展的过程中以父母为首的周围人的关系和社会交流的相互作用,因此C项是最恰当的答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6cyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoMrSingh,onwhichthingdomanypeoplemakesuperficialobservations?HowmanychildrendoesMrSinghhave?
Howdidthestudentgettheuniversityprospectus?(only)assessed
【21】Shesaysthatnon-nativespeakerstudentsneedtoanticipateand______inordertogetinvolvedinseminardiscussions.
Theuniversityhasproduceda______toinformstudentsaboutthedifferentaccommodationoptionsavailable.GrampianHalls
Whichofthesemedicalprofessions,onaverage,earnstheleast?
Thelecturersaysthatanessayislike______toaspecificquestion.Considertheeffectsofdivorceonchildren.
ChooseTHREEletters,A-F.WhichTHREEthingsarethestudentsrequiredtosubmittotheirprofessor?AawrittensummaryBnote
TheGherkinBuildingCommissionedby:【L31】________firmcalledFosterandPartnersThefeaturesofitsappearance:Itsshapeis
TheGherkinBuildingCommissionedby:【L31】________firmcalledFosterandPartnersThefeaturesofitsappearance:Itsshapeis
ForestryForestFireAccordingtotheinstructor,whyisperiodicfirenecessarytoforestecosystems?Clickontwoanswers.
随机试题
我国人大常委会已制定的卫生法律共有
企业按月计提无形资产的摊销,应借记“管理费用”等科目,贷记()
A.海金沙B.儿茶C.芦荟D.冰片E.青黛浸火柴杆于本品水浸液中,使着色,干后再浸入盐酸中立即取出,于火焰附近烤,杆上发生深红色反应的药材是
女,26岁,咳嗽、咳脓痰12年,间断咯血,痰量40ml/天。胸片示:两肺下部紊乱。
关于《放射性药品管理办法》,以下哪项不正确?()
我国西南某新建机场为高填方机场,在施工前和施工过程中发生了以下事件:事件一:在机场高填方工程大面积施工前,施工单位在适宜地段开展了高填方试验工作。事件二:为了追赶工期,在土石方施工完成2个月后,施工单位提出了立刻开始摊铺基层与面层施工的申请。事件三:
长城公司为上市公司,2012~2013年发生的与投资相关的交易或事项如下。 (1)2012年7月1日,长城公司向万达公司的控股股东中达公司以每股15元的发行价格定向增发本公司普通股股票500万股(每股面值1元),取得万达公司25%的股权。增发完成后,长
甲偿还了其对乙的赌债1000元,则下列说法正确的是()
甲在2000年6月立下遗嘱,将其遗产的一半由其子乙继承。甲2003年不幸死亡,现甲的继承人与乙在权利上发生纠纷,则()。
坚持按劳分配的主体地位对于坚持中国特色社会主义经济的性质具有重要意义。按劳分配是社会主义公有制在分配领域的体现,坚持按劳分配主体地位的意义是
最新回复
(
0
)