首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
admin
2013-05-29
25
问题
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this work most ethically. We concluded that it is vitally important for everyone, scientists and consumers alike, to remain alert to the ethical issues we may face as the world becomes filled with embedded, invisible computers.
Computer chips have been inserted into everyday objects since the earliest days of the microprocessor. Today, an average home might have 40 chips in various devices, from remote controls to alarm clocks to wristwatches. This fact has raised few new ethical issues. But as computers become more and more ubiquitous, and less visually obvious, three questions arise. Firstly, will these chips thinking for us make us forget how to think for ourselves? Secondly, will an "information underclass" without access to these devices be created? And thirdly, will these chips invade our privacy?
The goal of ubiquitous computing is to make technology invisible and, by embedding computers into everyday things, make the things themselves smarter. But will this lead to dumber people with less control over their technology? Automobiles, for example, use embedded computers for a host of functions that improve their performance and reliability. But fewer people now know enough about their car to be their own mechanic. Should this loss of a once common skill concern us? I think not. Ever since the first pre-human shaped a stone into an axe, we have been improving our technology. The invention of the axe did represent a loss of control, because some people were better at making axes than others. But the axe also made life easier, so we had more time to develop other skills, like agriculture, art and writing. As another step along this continuum of invention, ubiquitous computing won’t make people dumber; it will give them time to get smart about other things.
I believe, however, that everyone should be given an equal opportunity to get smart about other things. In this regard, there is legitimate concern that the new ubiquitous computers won’t be equally available to everyone, thus driving a wedge between high-tech "haves" and "have-nots". But it is important to realize that the prime mover behind the latest technology is not the technology itself, but an agreement—the Internet.
Agreeing on low computers should talk to one another on the internet has tremendous advantages for exchanging information, decreasing the cost of technology and creating new market opportunities. If all chips are able to relate to each other, then information can be shared cheaply. This means that Internet access may eventually cost only a dollar or two. If the trend towards ever cheaper, more widespread access to information continues, there will be no information underclass.
Ubiquitous computing will make our lives more convenient, but it will also allow computers to know everything about us. Private actions, such as reading the newspaper, may be shared with other computers—and their owners—all over the world. When computers know so much, whom will they tell?
If a computer runs your toaster, for example, it knows when you make toast, and how many slices. By correlating toast-making activity with the license plate numbers of cars parked in front of your house, a computer could determine if a guest had spent the night. But if you were a married politician, and even if you were not, your might want to keep this information secret.
Democracy is based on the principle that if people have enough information, wise decisions will be made. In an age in which embedded computers will provide us with ever more information, it is vital that the ethical implications of this new technology be openly debated. With a little vigilance and planning, we can reap the benefits of this new technology without compromising our intelligence, our opportunities or our freedom.
It can be inferred that "PARC" is a place where ______.
选项
A、computers are manufactured
B、scientists and consumers live together
C、there are computers embedded all around
D、ethical issues are taught in class
答案
C
解析
首句就指出了“PARC”全面电脑化已近十年了(lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years),可见C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9zHO777K
0
研究生英语学位课统考(GET)
相关试题推荐
Theexchangeofgoodwillmissiongreatly______abetterunderstandingbetweenthetwocountries.
Forestfiresfrequentlythreatenhumanlivesandcausegreatpropertydamagetopeople______insouthernCalifornia.
Youmayhavewonderedwhythesupermarketsareallthesame.Itisnotbecausethecompaniesthatoperatethemlackimagination.
Fastfood,amainstayofAmericaneatingfordecades,mayhavereachedaplateauintheUnitedStatesasthematuringbaby-boom
Sexprejudicesarebasedonandjustifiedbytheideologythatbiologyisdestiny.Accordingtothisideology,basicbiological
Governmentisnotmadeinvirtueofnaturalrights,whichmayanddoexistintotalindependenceofit,andexistinmuchgreate
Toparaphrase18th-centurystatesmanEdmundBurke,"Allthatisneededforthetriumphofamisguidedcauseisthatgoodpeople
(复旦大学2010年试题)Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationis
AbudgetapprovedbytheEuropeanParliamentfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunitywasdeclaredadoptedTuesdaydespiteopposition
随机试题
下列各项指标中,能够衡量风险的有()。
对疑似流脑患者留取标本进行病原学检查,下列哪些是错误的()
关节结核的关节面破坏首先发生在
区别挥发油与油脂常用的方法是
患者女性,26岁,蛋白尿2个月,血压135/68mmHg(18/9kPa),尿蛋白(+++),红细胞(++),肾活检病理示肾小球系膜区多种抗体和补体沉积,血中以降低及多种自身抗体阳性,可确诊为
下列应当以非法经营罪定罪处罚的情形有:()
根据《严寒和寒冷地区居住建筑节能设计标准》中有关体形系数的规定,严寒地区一栋6层建筑的体形系数应该()。
Onlywhenheknowstheresultoftheexam______knowtostudyhard.
利用健康的基因来填补或替代基因疾病中某些缺失或病变的基因称为基因疗法.目前的基因疗法是利用()当载体,使人体细胞“获得”正常的基因。
Readthetextbelowaboutamanagementtrainingcourse.Inmostofthelines(41-52)thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergramm
最新回复
(
0
)