首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
42
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
"British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice." It implies that ______.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、the British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
这是一道推断题,句意为“英国审判制度与其说是严肃执法,倒不如说是一场游戏。”其言外之意就是“英国法律制度并不公正。”于是,正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/A6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Somemoderncitiesareusuallyfamousforpeoplewholiveaverylongtime.
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothe3articlesonjuveniledelinquency.AnswereachquestionbychoosingA,BorCand
Ontheheelsofitsrecentdecisiontocriminalizeconsumerswhoripsongsfromalbumstheyhavepurchasedtotheircomputers(or
YouwillhearaconversationbetweenMissGreen,aneducationaljournalist,andProfessorWilson,anexpertineducationalstudi
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
Somedoctorsaretakinganunusualnewapproachtocommunicatebetterwithpatients—theyareletting【C1】______readthenotestha
Somedoctorsaretakinganunusualnewapproachtocommunicatebetterwithpatients—theyareletting【C1】______readthenotestha
Whatarethespeakerstryingtodo?
communicationemail如此深入生活,大家对它都不陌生,所以email作为交流的工具的作用应该是人人认可的。此题的答案通过听前预测就应该有所确定。
随机试题
某建筑公司与职工小王因为工资奖金的问题产生了劳动争议,小王准备去当地的劳动争议仲裁委员会申请劳动仲裁。依据《劳动法》的规定,对劳动仲裁的理解正确的是()。
《冯谖客孟尝君》写了三次弹铗、营造三窟,这种情节安排的特点是()
患者,男性,37岁。急刹车致使方向盘挤压上腹部16小时,上腹部、腰部及右肩疼痛,持续伴恶心、呕吐。查体:体温38.4℃,上腹部肌紧张明显,有压痛,反跳痛不明显,无移动性浊音,肠鸣音存在,怀疑胰腺损伤如果处理不当,最可能的远期并发症是
输血引起的急性溶血的特异性表现是
甲饲养的一只狗在乙公司施工的道路上追咬丙饲养的一只狗,行人丁在避让时失足掉入施工形成的坑里,受伤严重。下列哪些说法是错误的?()
下列建设单位对工程要求变更的处理方法中,正确的有()。
根据我国《预算法》的规定,不属于国务院财政部门预算职权的是()。
中国人民银行根据执行货币政策和金融稳定的需要,建议国务院银行业监督管理机构对某银行进行检查监督。这是中国人民银行在()。
18世纪以后,由科学革命、工业革命和政治革命构成的__________反应给予欧洲资本主义以不可阻挡的__________,至1914年,欧洲列强在世界大部分地区建立的霸权,深刻地影响着殖民地和半殖民地社会的经济生活和社会结构。而欧洲之所以能够实现这种前所
结构化程序流程图中一般包含3种基本结构,在下述结构中,()不属于其基本结构。
最新回复
(
0
)