首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
admin
2016-10-24
59
问题
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a list of the significant donors to the Conservative Party who had dined at No 10. By mid-morning, the Prime Minister had bowed to the pressure of the inevitable.and details of four dinners were duly released. Quite right, too.
Mr. Cameron claims to want to lead the most transparent and open government in the world. But the reality has been all too different, the most substantial progress is made only when the Prime Minister has a gun to his head.
Rules ensuring that ministers log all meetings with media executives, for example, were only put in place after the uproar over phone hacking had claimed the News of the World and led to the creation of the Leveson Inquiry. Given that the cozy relations between Government and media would unavoidably feature in the hearings, Mr. Cameron’s move was less a sign of a heartfelt commitment to openness than a pre-emptive strike(预防性打击).
Similarly, proposals to set up a register of lobbyists had all but stalled until this newspaper’s investigation revealed Bell Pottinger executives soliciting for business from a repressive government, boasting about their links with the Conservative high command and claiming that clients’ "messages" would get through to top advisers.
And it is only now—in an attempt to head off the scandal over Peter Crudda’s crude selling of access and influence—that Mr. Cameron has grudgingly revealed his dinner dates with major benefactors and set out rules that ministers meeting with party donors must report any discussions of policy to their Permanent Secretaries.
Mr. Cameron’s ill-judged uncommunicativeness alone would have added to suspicions of impropriety. But it is his supporters’ efforts to explain his reluctance——with false distinctions between public and private dinners, between meals and that take place in Downing Street or elsewhere, between public and private dinners, between those at Mr. Cameron’s expense and those not—that really make the case for complete openness in all matters relating to access to the Prime Minister.
A central claim is that the Downing Street flat is a private home and that any activities there should therefore be inviolable. The assertion is a ridiculous one. The flat is the residence of the British Prime Minister. It cannot be argued that simply because food is served upstairs rather than downstairs there is no cause for concern.
Quite the reverse, in fact. So long as large sums of money are changing hands, the implication of influence bought is unavoidable;even more so, if the meetings are informal. Indeed, the two-step over Mr. Cameron’s supper companions has only added to the sense of government-by-inner-group, of a blurred world of friendship and influence accessible to those with money to pay. It is up to the Prime Minister to dispel such damaging impressions forthwith.
Ultimately, there is but one remedy: take the big money out of politics. Previous attempts to cap donations have fallen foul of the three main parties’ inability to agree. But the Cruddas scandal may yet tip the balance, and Francis Maude, a senior Tory minister, yesterday announced plans for quick cross-party talks on reform.
In the meantime, it is obligatory upon Mr. Cameron to establish an immediate policy of absolute transparency. That means not simply a list of dinners with donors. It means every engagement of any kind must be put into the public domain. The sacrifice of his personal privacy is a small price to pay to guarantee the incorruptibility of the highest office of the land.
The main message of the first two paragraphs is that
选项
A、Cameron’s government refused to make a change in its policy
B、Cameron’s government was forced to reveal the names of the dinners
C、Cameron had to consider under great pressure resigning from his post
D、Cameron had once been attacked by an assassin in his life
答案
A
解析
头两段的主要信息是卡梅伦政府拒绝改变政策。第二段说,卡梅伦先生声称想要领导世界上最透明、最开明的政府。但事实则迥然不同,只有在首相把枪对准他的脑袋时,才会取得巨大的进展。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/C3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Insomecountrieswhereracialprejudiceisacute,violencehassocometobetakenforgrantedasameansofsolvingdifference
Researcherswhoareunfamiliarwiththeculturalandethnicgroupstheyarestudyingmusttakeextraprecautionstoshedanybia
Henrywentthroughthedocumentsagaincarefullyforfearof______anyimportantdata.
Inthepast,Americancollegesanduniversitieswerecreatedtoserveadualpurposetoadvancelearningandtoofferachancet
A"scientific"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:ReduceWasteonCampus.Youshoul
Thepolice_____toemergenciesinjustafewminuteswhentheaccidenthappened.
OnthemorningofSeptember11th,IboardedthetrainfromWashingtonHeightsinUpperManhattanjustasusualandwenttotheB
随机试题
椎骨最前方有()
A.右上腹绞痛伴压痛、黄疸,Murphy征阳性B.脐周阵痛,伴有压痛、肠鸣音亢进,有肠型C.上腹压痛,板样强直,肝浊音界消失D.上腹部胀痛,伴有胃型及振水音E.剑突卜持续钝痛,腹部无体征下述疾病的临床特点是胃溃疡穿孔
心主神志的物质基础是
患者,男,48岁。背部生疮,初起肿块上有一粟粒样脓头,抓破后局部肿痛加剧,色红灼热,脓头相继增多,溃后如蜂窝状,伴有寒热头痛,纳呆,便秘,溲赤,舌质红,苔黄,脉弦数。其诊断是()
根据规定,国有资产的监督管理部门的主要职责有()。
按照现行资源税代扣代缴的规定,下列说法不正确的有()。
()父母不当的教养方式,是社交恐怖症发生的一个危险因素。
马克思主义经典作家对经济全球化的趋势进行了论述,其中首推
A、Encouragingotherstofollowhiswrong-doing.B、Stealingendangeredanimalsfromthezoo.C、Organisingpeopleagainsttheauth
Duringthesummerholidayseasonthereareno______roomsinthisseasidehotel.
最新回复
(
0
)