首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
44
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
"The British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice," implies that ______.
选项
A、the British legal system can de the basic job well—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the Continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、the British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
这是一道推断题,句意为“英国审判制度与其说是严肃执法,倒不如说是一场游戏。”其言外之意就是“英国法律制度并不公正。”于是,正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readthearticlebelowaboutcomputerindustry.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswer.Markon
CustomerTargetingFindingandkeepingloyalandprofitablecustomersisessential.Theroutetolong-termsuccessistofin
Pamphlet①Presentthecouponandticktheitemsyoulike,②andyou’llgetthemforhalftheprice.
TheDevelopmentProgrammeManagementProcessAEstablishingareviewboardfordevelopmentsBEstablishingreviewcriteriaandm
FeaturesofWarehouseManagementSystemWarehouseManagementSystemsaregainingimportancesimilartothatofothersoftwar
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperiodofnearlyfortyyears.Beginninginthe1970’s,h
RussianwomenhadtowearprotectivemasksastheywalkedinMoscow,whichwas______byaheavysmogyesterday.
Thefloorofhisstudywasoccupiedbya______massofbooksandpapers.
【81】AttwominutestonooninSeptember1of1923,thegreatclockinTokyostopped.【82】TokyoBayshookasifhugerughadbeen
随机试题
发生糖尿病酮症酸中毒时宜选用
冈崎片段产生的原因是
心痛的主要病机为
女性,32岁。1周前足部有过疖肿,前天开始发热,头痛伴有高热、寒战、咳脓痰,痰中带血丝,胸痛,听诊两肺呼吸音增强,偶有少量湿啰音,WBC21×109/L,中性0.90,胸片两肺散在密度较淡的圆形病变,其中部分病灶有空洞伴液平,应考虑为
此证辨证属于()前医用大柴胡汤治疗未效,应改用()
慢惊风总的治疗原则是( )
实现产业结构高度化,要求资源利用水平随着经济技术的进步不断突破原有界限,从而不断推进产业结构中()的成长。
甲公司职工人数为120人,全体职工均于2010年3月1日签订了1年期的劳动合同。从2010年9月起,由于市场发生变化,生产经营发生严重困难,甲公司开始拖欠职工工资。2011年1月,甲公司濒临破产,被法院裁定进行重整。甲公司决定裁减部分职工,裁减人数初步确定
道教中的正一道主要流行于()。
下列哪一项不是公安机关的基本任务?()
最新回复
(
0
)