首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
42
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word deride in Paragraph 10 is closest in meaning to ______.
选项
A、mock
B、assist
C、haste
D、ignore
答案
A
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词deride的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:那些deride为家庭诉讼开庭提议的人忽略了一点,即只有在很极端的情况下,父母才会把他的孩子送上公堂。根据上下文可以判断出deride的意思是“嘲笑”,故正确答案为选项A。选项B(帮助)、C(匆忙)和D(忽视)都不合题意,因此不能选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/COyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
DecidewhichFOURofthefollowingstatementsaretrue,accordingtothespeaker.Writetheappropriatelettersinanyorderon
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Yousignanagreementunderthispackage.Youbuymorecreditwhenyouchoose.
SECTION2Questions11-20Questions11-13CompletethefollowinginformationusingONEwordforeachgap.Thespeakerrecommends
Whereisthestudentfrom?Whatistheproblemmanystudentswithlibrary?
Whereisthestudentfrom?Whatdoestheadvisersuggestthestudentcreatetomanagehertime?
Questions18-20Completethesentencesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.BowelCoachingCourseCoacheshelppeoplema
Completethesummarybelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.Afterhighschoolsomepeopletravel,finda(a
Mostimportantindicatorsofsuccess(%)Happyfamilylife82%Goodhealthand【L5】________79%Jobsatisfaction73%【L6】________(
AWoodenbattenBPVCpanelCMosquitorepellentDMattingESupportingwall
随机试题
室间隔缺损伴有肺动脉高压时,不应出现的表现是
A.窦房结B.心房肌C.心室肌D.房室交界E.浦肯野纤维自律性最高的是
按计息方式对债券进行分类,包含()。Ⅰ浮动利率债券Ⅱ附息债券Ⅲ贴现债券Ⅳ单利债券Ⅴ累进利率债券
消费者协会是对商品和服务进行社会监督的保护消费者合法权益的()。
阅读以下文字。完成下列问题。“腾笼换鸟”是几年前我国一些沿海地区根据当地经济发展状况和国家转变经济发展方式大战略提出的区域经济战略。由于国际金融危机冲击和经济形势变化,这一战略没有来得及全面实施。有人质疑“腾笼换鸟”脱离我国的优势,迟滞地区经济发
[*]
在考生文件夹下完成下列简单应用:(1)修改并执行程序four.prg,该程序的功能是:根据“学院表”和“教师表”计算“信息管理”系教师的平均工资。注意:只能修改标有错误的语句行,不能修改其他语句。(2)在College数据库中使用视图设计器
Growingeconomicproblemswerehighlightedbyaslowdowninoiloutput.
ThelegendoftheKnightsoftheRoundTableisalwaysassociatedwith______.
GettingBetterGrades1.AttendallyourclassesReasons:-Absorb【T1】______【T1】______-Make【T2】______known【T2】______-Earn
最新回复
(
0
)