首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
72
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
The following things about the railroads aroused public resentment EXCEPT ______ .
选项
A、their political power
B、high fares
C、the economic loss
D、their indifference toward individuals
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在文章的结尾段,讲述了人们对这类案件态度的改变,以及造成态度转变的因素。A、B、D三项均符合文意,只有C项文中未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Massmediaismediathatisintendedforalargeaudience.Itmaytaketheformofbroadcastmedia,asincaseoftelevisionan
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspittedagainstanotherAmericangrandmaster,SamuelReshe
ThroughouttheU.S.studentsaregettingouttheirNo.2pencils,readyendureastress-packedfourhoursofbubblinginanswers
A、Early18thcentury.B、Early19thcentury.C、Early20thcentury.D、Early21thcentury.C信息题。录音中提到:No,mechanicalvehiclesweren’
TheMessagesinDistanceI.Peoplefromdifferentcultures【T1】______differently【T1】______A.NorthAmericansstandabouttwof
PhysicalEducationI.BriefintroductionofthecoursesA.PhysicalFitnessInstructors—six-monthcertificateB.SportsAdmini
A、Smoking.B、Drinking.C、Depression.D、Medication.A此题也需要用排除法解答。关于长久认知问题产生的主要原因,受访者提到:Persistentcognitiveproblemsina40-some
Tobecalledbeautifulisthoughttonamesomethingessentialtowomen’scharacterandconcerns.(Incontrastbymen—whoseessen
TheIndiancoastalbelthasnotrecordedmanyTsunamisinthepast.Wavescompanyingearthquakeactivityhavebeenreportedover
Excessivecaloriesfromsugarcancontributetoweightproblems,andsugarisalsowellknownforitsabilitytopromoteteethd
随机试题
慢性再生障碍性贫血的治疗,应首选
氨茶碱治疗心源性哮喘主要机制是
苯丙酮尿症的遗传形式为
下列哪些情况违反禁止权利的滥用原则?()
下列说法正确的是()。
统计调查的分类目录必须由()统一制定。
某学生对于某门课程的学习毫无兴趣。但为了第二天的考试能够及格而熬夜学习,此时这个学生的学习动机类型是()
A
Sheissucha______person,alwaysaskinghowI’mfeeling.
Mostofusknowtostaylowtothefloorifwe’recaughtinafire,orheadtothebasementifastorm’scoming,orboardupthe
最新回复
(
0
)