首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
52
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments? ______
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are worried very much.
C、They may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Researchshouldcontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithaspr
ItisrumoredthatMr.Smith,thegrandsonofthefounderoftheuniversityandaprofessorofphilosophy,willbe______aspresi
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Theprisoner________thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
It’sasurethingthatifsheknowsthatthereisa______saleintown,shewillcertainlyrushtothescene.
Mostyoungpeoplethinkthatisaninterestingbook,buttopeopleofmygeneration,itisboringandfullofnonsense.
Themagistrateisnowchargedwithseveralcrimes,includingfraud,acceptingbribesandtaxevasion.
AdiscoveryinNewJerseyactuallycontributedtotheearlyeconomicdevelopmentoftheU.S.and,in1714aworkeruncoveredag
随机试题
分析仪器的性能检查不包括
脊柱骨转移瘤,CT扫描更重要的是可以明确
患者男,36岁。转移性右下腹疼痛8小时入院,患者腹痛为阵发性疼痛,开始位于剑突下,4小时后疼痛转移至右下腹部,并有压痛、反跳痛,伴有恶心、呕吐,T38℃,无咳嗽、胸闷、气促。下面哪些是阑尾切除的适应证
患者,男,34岁。5天前有不洁性接触史,昨日开始尿痛、尿频、尿道口出现少许分泌物,今日症状加重,分泌物变成黄色脓性。确诊淋病的检验结果应是
根据《劳动合同法》的规定,用人单位扣押劳动者居民身份证等证件的,由()责令限期退还劳动者本人,并依照有关法律规定给予处罚。
我国内地江西南昌的A公司委托沿海浙江宁波的B公司从国外进口机器一台,合同规定买方对货物品质不符合合同的索赔期限为货到目的港30天内。货到宁波后,B公司立即将机器转至江西南昌交给A公司。由于A公司的厂房尚未建好,机器无法安装,4个月后,待厂房完工,机器装好,
证券分析师在进行公司财务分析时,一般应特别关注一下财务报表附注四个方面的内容。下列各项不属于其内容的是( )。
由两个或两个以上雇员所组成的工作小组内部进行的沟通称之为()。
符合“诚信”作为职业道德规范的“智慧性”要求的做法是()。
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisCORRECT?
最新回复
(
0
)