首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
60
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
Why do some people scan friends’ books and records on the shelf?
选项
A、Because books reflect one’s nature.
B、Because it is polite to do so.
C、Because they want to supply each other’s needs.
D、Because books of others are better.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JUc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AnintegralpartofthestoryofAmerica,thecowboyisanationalsymbol.America’sfirstcowboyscamefromMexico.Beginni
Ifyoubuysomethingfromabroad,youshouldpay______onitwhenyougothroughthecustoms.
A、Shealreadytoldthemanaboutherplans.B、Sherecentlyvisitedadifferentuniversity.C、Sheisn’tplanningtotransfertoa
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixedabilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeand【B1】______
Recently,astudentusedhisPersonalDigitalAssistant(PDA)tofilmafemaleteacherberating(训斥)andtearingtheworkofac
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Theunauthorized(未经授权的)copyingofcomputerprogramsbyAmericanbusinessesalonedeprivedsoftwarepublishersof$1.6billion
Therecentoutbreakofbirdfluresultsin______.Ithasbeendiscoveredthat______.
Recently,thenewshasbeenfilledwithreportsofthe"birdflu."Asiaisonaregion-widehealthalert,withgovernmentsslaug
Beforethe1870’strainednurseswerevirtuallyunknownintheUnitedStates.Hospitalnursingwasanunskilledoccupation,tak
随机试题
Access操作题 在AccesS2010数据库中,有如下图所示xscj数据表,根据所学知识回答下列问题。 写出完成下列查询的SQL语句。 查询xscj表中专业成绩不低于90分的学生信息,并将查询结果输出到“优秀学生”表。
2017年7月,原煤产量2.9亿吨,同比增长8.5%,继续保持较快增长,但比6月回落2.1个百分点;日均生产950万吨,比6月减少78万吨。1一7月,原煤产量20.1亿吨,同比增长5.4%。分地区来看,7月,山西、内蒙古、陕西、宁夏4个地区同比
把下面的句子翻译成现代汉语知不可乎骤得,托遗响于悲风。
处方中“每晚”的缩写词是
A.精神分裂症紧张型B.抑郁症C.精神分裂症偏执型D.神经衰弱E.精神分裂症单纯型男性,30岁,近半年来总觉得有人跟踪他,认为室内被装了窃听器,因而不敢大声说话。常常听到有人在议论如何对付他,怀疑单位同事和领导要害他,继而出现易激惹,写信与
下列关于民用建筑项目安全防护方面的说法中,错误的是()。
企业在所得税免税年度或亏损年度发生虚报亏损,在行为当年或相关年度未造成不缴、少缴税款的,由税务机关限期改正.并处5万元以下罚款。()
事业单位人事制度改革的基本思路是()。
多时制文化中的人们遵守的不是物理时间,而是()时间。
下列有关内联函数的叙述中,正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)