首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
admin
2010-07-19
52
问题
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice synthesizer, or perhaps in sign language, the lucky ape will argue that it has a fundamental right to liberty. "This is going to be a very important case." Duke University law Prof. William Reppy Jr. told the New York Times.
Reppy concedes that apes can talk only at the level of a human 4-year-old, so they may not be ready to discuss abstractions like oppression and freedom. Just last month, one ape did manage to say through a synthesizer: "Please buy me a hamburger." That may not sound like crucial testimony, but lawyers think that the spectacle of an ape saying anything at all in court may change a lot of minds about the status of animals as property.
One problem is that apes probably won’t be able to convince judges that they know right from wrong, or that they intend to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Since they are not persons, they don’t even have legal standing to sue. No problem, says Steven Wise, who taught animal law for 10 years at Vermont law school and is now teaching Harvard law school’s first course in the subject. He says lawyers should be able to use slavery-era statutes that authorized legal nonpersons (slaves) to bring lawsuits. Gary Francione, who teaches animal law at Rutgers University, says that gorillas "should be declared to be persons under the constitution."
Unlike mainstream animal-welfare activists, radical animal-rights activists think that all animals are morally equal and have rights, though not necessarily the same rights as humans. So the law’s denial of rights to animals is simply a matter of bias-speciesism. It’s even an expression of bias to talk about protecting wildlife, since this assumes that human control and domination of other species is acceptable. These are surely far-out ideas. "Would even bacteria have rights?" asks one exasperated law professor, Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School.
For the moment, the radicals want to confine the rights discussion to apes and chimps, mostly to avoid the obvious mockery about litigious lemmings, cockroach liberation, and the issue of whether a hyena eating an antelope is committing a rights violation that should be brought before the world court in the Hague. One wag wrote a poem containing the line, "Every beast within his paws/Will clutch an order to show cause."
The news is that law schools are increasingly involved in animal issues. Any radical notion that vastly inflates the concept of rights and requires a lot more litigation is apt to take root in the law schools. ("Some lawyers say they are in the field to advance their ideology, but some note that it is an area of legal practice that could be profitable," reports the New York Times.)
A dozen law schools now feature courses on animal law, and in some cases at least, the teaching seems to be a simple extension of radical activism. The course description of next spring’s "Animal Law Seminar" at Georgetown University Law Center, for instance, makes clear to students which opinions are the correct ones to have, It talks about the plight of "rightless plaintiffs" and promises to examine how and why laws "purporting to protect" animals have failed.
Ideas about humane treatment of animals are indeed changing. Many of us have changed our minds about furs, zoos, slaughterhouse techniques, and at least some forms of animal experimentation. The debate about greater concern for the animal world continues. But the alliance between the radicals and the lawyers means that, once again, an issue that ought to be taken to the people and resolved by democratic means will most likely be pre-empted by judges and lawyers. Steven Wise talks of using the courts to knock down the wall between humans and apes. Once apes have rights, he says, the status of other animals can be decided by other courts and other litigation.
The advantage of the litigation strategy is that there’s no need to sell radical ideas to the American people. There are almost no takers for the concept of "nonhuman personhood," the view of pets as slaves, or the notion that meat eating is part of "a specter of oppression" that equally afflicts minorities, women, and animals in America. You can supersede open debate by convincing a few judges to detect a "rights" issue that functions as a political trump card. The rhetoric is high-minded, but the strategy is to force change without gaining the consent of the public.
Converting every controversy into a "rights" issue is by now a knee-jerk response. Harvard Law Prof. Mary Ann Glendon, author of Rights Talk, writes about our legal culture’s "lost language of obligation." Instead of casting arguments in terms of human responsibility for the natural world, rights talkers automatically spin out tortured arguments about "rights" of animals and even about the "rights" of trees and mountains. This is how "rights talk" becomes a parody of itself. Let’s hope the lawyers and the law schools eventually get the joke. (853 words)
The author would agree that ______.
选项
A、it is ridiculous to think about cockroach liberation seriously
B、the law’s denial of rights to animals is a matter of bias-speciesism
C、apes can express feelings accurately through synthesizer
D、gorillas should be declared to be persons under the constitution
答案
A
解析
作者对激进的极端动物权利保护者是持反对态度的。参见文章第4、5段。B显然错误。C认为 apes可以准确地表达思想感情与文中所给信息不符。D也不正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
PartofthenewdesignistobeconcernedwiththefollowingEXCEPTThisarticleaimsto
Howmanystudentswerekilledinthegunshot?
A、influencethemarketB、increaseoilpricesC、stimulatetheeconomyD、showtheirpowerA
A、Peopleofcomparativelyhigherlevels.B、Peopleconsistinglargelyofuniversitystudents,postgraduates,Englishworkers.C、T
TwospaceshuttleastronautsscalingtheoutsideoftheInternationalSpaceStationranintosometroubleTuesdaywithamix-up
A、toomuchexerciseoftenleadstoashorterlifespanB、Americanfootballistooviolenttobegoodforone’shealthC、toexerc
InBritain,thetopspectatorsportisfootball.Thissportwasseriously【1】_____asanorganizedgamein1848Later,theFoo
Mikebegantoplaybaseballat______.
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
随机试题
具有舒张肾血管的拟肾上腺素药是
具有疏肝下气的功效的是
患者男性,56岁,有肝硬化病史10余年。近日食欲明显减退,黄疸加重。今晨因剧烈咳嗽突然呕咖啡色液体约1200ml,黑便2次,伴头晕、眼花、心悸。急诊入院。体检:神志清楚,面色苍白,血压80/60mmHg,心率110次/分。若经过治疗,患者情况已基本稳定
依照有关规定,应当作为内幕信息是,上市公司将其营业用主要资产进行抵押一次超过该资产的()。
我国企业采用()编制资产负债表。
()是指把同一组应聘者的同一测试分为若干部分进行考察,衡量各部分所得结果之间的一致性。
人类社会的物质生活资料的生产,即物质生产()。
甲素知乙家有钱,且每天白天只有一老妇看家,遂起抢劫意念。为使抢劫顺利,甲先盗窃军用手枪一支,子弹十发。一切准备就绪后,将枪弹藏于身上,来到乙家。时逢老妇偶然外出,甲撬门入室,发现室内无人,于是窃得现金及其他财物总价值一万余元。正准备逃离时,老妇回来,甲遂开
传统观点认为,尽管用于制造贫铀弹所使用的贫铀放射性低,仍会导致人类染色体受损,从而引发肿瘤或癌症。但是,在最近的一项研究中,研究人员对接触过贫铀弹的退伍老兵的血细胞进行研究,到目前为止,还没有检测到任何染色体断裂和重复,并没有发现任何出于接触贫铀弹而造成的
在文本框控件中,将Text的内容全部显示为用户所定义的字符的属性是()。
最新回复
(
0
)