首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based,on Reading Passage 1 below. Can ani
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based,on Reading Passage 1 below. Can ani
admin
2017-04-14
32
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based,on Reading Passage 1 below.
Can animals count?
Prime among basic numerical faculties is the ability to distinguish between a larger and a smaller number, says psychologist Elizabeth Brannon. Humans can do this with ease - providing the ratio is big enough - but do other animals share this ability? In one experiment, rhesus monkeys and university students examined two sets of geometrical objects that appeared briefly on a computer monitor. They had to decide which set contained more objects. Both groups performed successfully but, importantly, Brannon’s team found that monkeys, like humans, make more errors when two sets of objects are close in number. ’The students’ performance ends up looking just like a monkey’s. It’s practically identical,’ she says.
Humans and monkeys are mammals, in the animal family known as primates. These are not the only animals whose numerical capacities rely on ratio, however. The same seems to apply to some amphibians. Psychologist Claudia Uller’s team tempted salamanders with two sets of fruit flies held in clear tubes. In a series of trials, the researchers noted which tube the salamanders scampered towards, reasoning that if they had a capacity to recognise number, they would head for the larger number. The salamanders successfully discriminated between tubes containing 8 and 16 flies respectively, but not between 3 and 4, 4 and 6, or 8 and 12. So it seems that for the salamanders to discriminate between two numbers, the larger must be at least twice as big as the smaller. However, they could differentiate between 2 and 3 flies just as well as between 1 and 2 flies, suggesting they recognise small numbers in a different way from larger numbers.
Further support for this theory comes from studies of mosquitofish, which instinctively join the biggest shoal* they can. A team at the University of Padova found that while mosquitofish can tell the difference between a group containing 3 shoal-mates and a group containing 4, they did not show a preference between groups of 4 and 5. The team also found that mosquitofish can discriminate between numbers up to 16, but only if the ratio between the fish in each shoal was greater than 2:1. This indicates that the fish, like salamanders, possess both the approximate and precise number systems found in more intelligent animals such as infant humans and other primates.
While these findings are highly suggestive, some critics argue that the animals might be relying on other factors to complete the tasks, without considering the number itself. ’Any study that’s claiming an animal is capable of representing number should also be controlling for other factors,’ says Brannon. Experiments have confirmed that primates can indeed perform numerical feats without extra clues, but what about the more primitive animals? To consider this possibility, the mosquitofish tests were repeated, this time using varying geometrical shapes in place of fish. The team arranged these shapes so that they had the same overall surface area and luminance even though they contained a different number of objects. Across hundreds of trials on 14 different fish, the team found they consistently discriminated 2 objects from 3. The team is now testing whether mosquitofish can also distinguish 3 geometric objects from 4.
Even more primitive organisms may share this ability. Entomologist Jurgen Tautz sent a group of bees down a corridor, at the end of which lay two chambers - one which contained sugar water, which they like, while the other was empty. To test the bees’ numeracy, the team marked each chamber with a different number of geometrical shapes - between 2 and 6. The bees quickly learned to match the number of shapes with the correct chamber. Like the salamanders and fish, there was a limit to the bees’ mathematical prowess -they could differentiate up to 4 shapes, but failed with 5 or 6 shapes.
These studies still do not show whether animals learn to count through training, or whether they are born with the skills already intact. If the latter is true, it would suggest there was a strong evolutionary advantage to a mathematical mind. Proof that this may be the case has emerged from an experiment testing the mathematical ability of three- and four-day-old chicks. Like mosquitofish, chicks prefer to be around as many of their siblings as possible, so they will always head towards a larger number of their kin. If chicks spend their first few days surrounded by certain objects, they become attached to these objects as if they were family. Researchers placed each chick in the middle of a platform and showed it two groups of balls of paper. Next, they hid the two piles behind screens, changed the quantities and revealed them to the chick. This forced the chick to perform simple computations to decide which side now contained the biggest number of its "brothers". Without any prior coaching, the chicks scuttled to the larger quantity at a rate well above chance. They were doing some very simple arithmetic, claim the researchers.
Why these skills evolved is not hard to imagine, since it would help almost any animal forage for food. Animals on the prowl for sustenance must constantly decide which tree has the most fruit, or which patch of flowers will contain the most nectar. There are also other, less obvious, advantages of numeracy. In one compelling example, researchers in America found that female coots appear to calculate how many eggs they have laid - and add any in the nest laid by an intruder - before making any decisions about adding to them. Exactly how ancient these skills are is difficult to determine, however. Only by studying the numerical abilities of more and more creatures using standardised procedures can we hope to understand the basic preconditions for the evolution of number.
* a group of fish
Questions 1-7
Complete the table below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
选项
答案
fruit flies
解析
The second paragraph says ’tempted salamanders with two sets of fruit flies held in clear tubes’.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JlNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
His______oftheassignedpageswasitselfamuchtoolengthysummary;byallaccounts,ifhewishestosucceedbythestandards
Allmammalsrequiresleep;itisanessentialpartoflife.Forgiraffes,twohoursaLinedayisenough.Forbats,thatnumber
Allmammalsrequiresleep;itisanessentialpartoflife.Forgiraffes,twohoursaLinedayisenough.Forbats,thatnumber
(Thispassagewaswrittenpriorto1950)Wenowknowthatwhatconstitutespracticallyallofmatterisemptyspa
ThispassageisadaptedfromTheAmericanRepublic:Constitution,Tendencies,andDestinybyO.A.Brownson,1866.Thean
Accordingtocolorpsychologists,certainhuestendtoreflectparticularpersonality______;violet,forexample,indicatesate
WhetherthelanguagesoftheancientAmericanpeopleswereusedforexpressingabstractuniversalconceptscanbeclearlyanswer
Inaplausiblebutspeculativescenario,oceanographerDouglasMartinsonsuggeststhattemperatureincreasescausedbyglobalwa
Cathedralsusuallytakedecades,evencenturies,tocomplete;thus,nooneexpectedtheNationalCathedraltobebuiltwith_____
随机试题
早期肺脓肿易与以下哪种疾病混淆
诊断缺铁性贫血早期最可靠的依据是
根据《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》关于风险转移的规定,下列表述正确的是()。
2013年7月30日6时40分,D公司制氧厂乙班值班主任王某接公司总调度员通知,氧气主管网压力低,约0.5MPa。6时50分,丙班即将接班,王某告诉丙班值班主任刘某,调压间氧气气动薄膜调节阀存在故障,刘某告诉王某处理完调压间故障后再接班。于是王某带领乙班电
背景资料某施工单位承担的一项机电安装工程进入单体试运行阶段。项目部计划对一台解体出厂、现场组装的大型裂解石油气压缩机进行试运行,该压缩机转速为5850转/分。试运行前进行检查,确认试运行范围内的工程,压缩机出口管道系统设计压力为11.2MPa,组
在变动成本法与完全成本法下,引起分期损益产生差异的根本原因是()。
民警小王3月15日9时盘查一名形迹可疑男子时,发现其书包中有很多疑似作案工具,10时带回派出所继续盘问。继续盘问不超过的时间是()。
甲偷看了乙的日记,了解到数年前乙与丙因志向不同而导致恋爱失败。甲于是广为散布,称乙因道德败坏而被女友抛弃。乙被侵犯的权利是()。
马克思主义认为,主客体之间的价值关系是指
已知总体X服从参数为p(0<p<1)的几何分布:P{X=x}=(1一p)x-1p(x=1,2,…),X1,…,Xn是来自总体X的简单随机样本,则未知参数p的矩估计量为_____;最大似然估计量为_______。
最新回复
(
0
)