首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The era of divided government begins, inauspiciously. Will the president be able to see the wood for the subpoenas? I suspect th
The era of divided government begins, inauspiciously. Will the president be able to see the wood for the subpoenas? I suspect th
admin
2020-12-01
21
问题
The era of divided government begins, inauspiciously. Will the president be able to see the wood for the subpoenas? I suspect that however loyal congressional Republicans appear in public, privately they are weary of Mr. Trump’s intemperance and unpredictability, and may pressure him as the shutdown drags on.
Some argue that what Mr. Trump really wants is not the wall, but the fight over the wall. After all, if he really wanted his $5bn he could negotiate a deal with Democrats to get it — perhaps by agreeing to provide dreamers (undocumented immigrants brought to America as children) a path to citizenship. But his base prizes his
pugnacity
above any realistically attainable concrete achievement, and he sees attacking Democrats as weak on crime and immigration as a better strategy than compromise.
"We have the issue, Border Security," he crowed on Twitter, two days after Christmas. He believes, not without reason, that his hawkish views on immigration won him the presidency in 2016, and remain his strongest suit. But that theory was tested in 2018, when Republican congressional candidates around the country ended their campaigns by stoking fears of, in Mr. Trump’s words, "death and destruction caused by people who shouldn’t be here." Leaving aside the fact that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than the native-born, that tactic failed. Republicans lost more seats in last year’s mid-terms than in any election since Watergate. Now Ms. Pelosi is once again House Speaker, and Democrats are committee chairmen with subpoena power.
How they will use that power will quickly become clear. They have spent months preparing. Matt Bennett of Third Way, a centrist Democratic think-tank, believes the committees will "fire subpoenas like machine guns... There will be full-blown investigations by the middle of January."
Elijah Cummings, the incoming chair of the House Oversight Committee, has already requested information about, among other things, the use of personal email for government work and payments to the Trump Organisation. Jerry Nadler, who will chair the House Judiciary Committee, plans to hold hearings on the administration’s family-separation policy and Russian interference in 2016. Adam Schiff, who will head the House Intelligence Committee, wants to investigate Mr. Trump’s business interests. Richard Neal, who will run the House Ways and Means Committee, plans to compel the release of Mr. Trump’s tax returns.
Mr. Trump’s approval ratings remain stuck around 40%; unlike most presidents, he has barely tried to expand his appeal. Meanwhile, Robert Mueller’s investigation is grinding inexorably forward. The president cannot afford to lose his cheerleaders’ support now, which may explain his refusal to negotiate over the wall. But that need not mean permanent
gridlock
. One can imagine Democrats agreeing to modestly increase border-security funding beyond $1.6bn — enough to let Mr. Trump save face, claim victory and reopen government.
Beyond that, the parties could spend the next two years battling over immigration while finding common ground where they can — on infrastructure, for instance, or prescription-drug pricing.
For Mr. Trump, personal relationships can supersede partisan policy disagreements. He seems genuinely to respect Ms. Pelosi’s toughness and accomplishment. He also appears fond of the cut-and-thrust with Mr. Schumer, a fellow outer-borough New Yorker. But his personalisation of politics cuts the other way too. Bill Clinton was able to shrug off Republican efforts to impeach him as just business, while keeping focused on policy goals. Mr. Trump, a famous counter-puncher, has shown no such ability to compartmentalise.
In the author’s opinion, Bill Clinton’s advantage was his ability to______.
选项
A、keep focused on policy goals
B、shrug off Republican efforts to impeach him
C、keep things apart
D、take politics personal
答案
C
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位最后一段第5句,克林顿能够将共和党对他的弹劾看作仅仅是例行公事,但同时又致力于实现政策目标,即作者认为克林顿能够将事务区别对待,这一点要胜过特朗普,故正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KwMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、thepaperisamemberofalargepressassociationB、thepaper’sethicalstandardsaresuspectedC、thepaperisinfinancialt
A、tothelocalgovernmentB、intothecountryinwhichtheyhavebeenbuiltC、abroadD、tothelocalinhabitantsC推理判断题。关于一些旅馆的利润,
A、thepaperisamemberofalargepressassociationB、thepaper’sethicalstandardsaresuspectedC、thepaperisinfinancialt
USPoliticiansDebate"NetNeutrality"VocabularyandExpressionssuspendfuel(v.)unleashWhatpreventsPresidentObam
WhatisthecommitmentoftheMalawigovernmentaccordingtotheMOU?
Peopleinwealthiernationsstronglysupportedthegovernmentstodomoretohelp.
Wemayhavesuspecteditalready,butnowthescience【C1】______:unmarriedandchildlesswomenarethehappiestsubgroupinthe
Wemayhavesuspecteditalready,butnowthescience【C1】______:unmarriedandchildlesswomenarethehappiestsubgroupinthe
Wemayhavesuspecteditalready,butnowthescience【C1】______:unmarriedandchildlesswomenarethehappiestsubgroupinthe
Wemayhavesuspecteditalready,butnowthescience【C1】______:unmarriedandchildlesswomenarethehappiestsubgroupinthe
随机试题
用层次分析法分析短语。交出一份惊人的答卷
下列关于被动扩散说法正确的是()。
预循环.是一种更环保的生活方式,指通过避免购入会产生垃圾的家庭或商业物品来减少垃圾数量的行为。可循环的垃圾经过处理后可以发挥别的功效,可是处理这些可循环物质也是要消耗能源并产生垃圾的,所以更加环保的方式是尽量减少使用会产生垃圾的物品。根据上述定义,下列各项
法国人谈起中国人心目中的法国文学,总忍不住用一种轻蔑的口吻说:“你们喜欢《茶花女》。”在法国人眼里,喜欢大仲马还算有些品位,毕竟他有一部《基度山伯爵》,有《三个火枪手》,小仲马有什么呢?只不过写了一个交际花而已。法国文学是法国人的骄傲,在世界文学中有着举足
我国《宪法》规定,矿藏、水流、森林、山岭、草原、荒地、滩涂等自然资源,都属于国家所有,即全民所有;由法律规定属于集体所有的森林和()除外。
简述如何促进知识的迁移。
[*]
Ford1Ford’sgreatstrengthwasthemanufacturingprocess—notinvention.Longbeforehestartedacarcompany,hewasawor
Hekeptaskingquestions,butnotaword_____.
A、UrgeJennytospendmoretimeonstudy.B、HelpJennytoprepareforthecomingexams.C、ActtowardsJennyinamoresensiblew
最新回复
(
0
)