首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
32
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
BarackObamainvitedapuzzlinggroupofpeopleintotheWhiteHouse:universitypresidents.Whatshouldonemakeofthesestran
Insomesocietiespeoplewantchildrenforwhatmightbecalledfamilialreasons:toextendthefamilylineorthefamilyname,
WhowasthefirstEnglishkingtobringallIrelandunderEnglishcontrol?
MyclassatHarvardBusinessSchoolhelpsstudentsunderstandwhatgoodmanagementtheoryisandhowitisbuilt.Ineachsessio
Ifyouhavemadeanymistakeintheclass,don’tfeelashamedforit.It’scommonforstudentstomakemistakes.
苏小姐领了个二十左右的娇小女孩子出来,介绍道:“这是我表妹唐晓芙。”唐小姐妩媚端正的圆脸,有两个浅酒窝。天生着一般女人要花钱费时、调脂和粉来仿造的好脸色,新鲜得使人见了忘掉口渴而又觉嘴馋,仿佛是好水果。她眼睛并不顶大,可是灵活温柔,反衬得许多女人的大眼
EskimovillagestodayarelargerandmorecomplexthanthetraditionalnomadicgroupsofEskimokinsmen.Villagedecisionmaking
ThefivegreattragedieswrittenbyShakespeareareRomeoandJuliet,Hamlet,Macbeth,Othelloand______.
InformationSuperhighwayatWorkThechangesinhowwecommunicatemakeitnecessarytochangehowwethinkaboutcommunicat
Mr.Duffyraisedhiseyesfromthepaperandgazedoutofhiswindowonthecheerlesseveninglandscape.Theriverlayquietbes
随机试题
斯金纳把人和动物的行为分为两大类,即应答性行为和操作性行为。()
Theessay________averyimportantargument.
城市社会学和城市规划都是以城市为研究对象的相关学科,二者关系十分密切,以下说法中不对的是()。
CIF术语的变形是用来说明由谁负担()。
量刑是人民法院行使审判权的内容之一。根据《中华人民共和国刑法》《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》规定,可以由基层人民法院作出裁判的有()。
W是纺织厂女工,三年前丈夫突然提出离婚,之后就没有了去向。W在极度悲伤中与刚上初中的女儿开始了单亲的生活。因为不愿听到外人议论自己婚姻的变故,W每天除上班之外就关起门守在家里看着女儿读书。W变得对周围的一切非常敏感,工间吃饭她自己单独躲在一边吃自己带的简单
科学发展观的本质和核心是()。
“最严格的土地管理制度”“最严格的耕地保护制度”“最严格的节约用地制度”,中央用三个“最严格”强调中国的土地管理制度。这是因为土地是()。
打开工作簿文件EXC.XLSX,对工作表”‘计算机动画技术’成绩单”内数据清单的内容进行筛选,条件是:实验成绩15分及以上,总成绩90分及以上的数据,工作表名不变,保存EXC.XLSX工作簿。
Asmenage,theytypicallygetlessandlessdeepsleep—afactthatcould【B1】______theweightgainthatoften【B2】______middle
最新回复
(
0
)