首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
admin
2019-08-27
31
问题
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than others. Should they pay proportionately more money to the government than those who earn less? And if they do pay more money are they entitled to more services than those who pay less or those who pay nothing at all? And should those who pay nothing at all because they have nothing get anything? These matters are of irritable concern to our rulers, and of some poignancy to the rest.
Although the equality of each citizen before the law is the rock upon which the American Constitution rests, economic equality has never been an American ideal. In fact, it is the one unmentionable subject in our politics, as the senator from South Dakota recently discovered when he came up with a few quasi-egalitarian tax reforms. The furious and enduring terror of Communism in America is not entirely the work of those early cold warriors Truman and Acheson. A dislike of economic equality is something deep-grained in the American Protestant character. After all, given a rich empty continent for vigorous Europeans to exploit (the Indians were simply a disagreeable part of the emptiness, like chiggers), any man of gumption could make himself a good living. With extra hard work, any man could make himself a fortune, proving that he was a better man than the rest. Long before Darwin the American ethos was Darwinian.
The vision of the rich empty continent is still a part of the American unconscious in spite of the Great Crowding and its attendant miseries; and this lingering belief in the heaven any man can make for himself through hard work and clean living is a key to the majority’s prevailing and apparently unalterable hatred of the poor, kept out of sight at home, out of mind abroad.
Yet there has been, from the beginning, a significant division in our ruling class. The early Thomas Jefferson had a dream: a society of honest yeomen, engaged in agricultural pursuits, without large cities, heavy industry, banks, military pretensions. The early (and the late) Alexander Hamilton wanted industry, banks, cities, and a military force capable of making itself felt in world politics. It is a nice irony that so many of today’s laissez-faire conservatives think that they descend from Hamilton, the proponent of a strong federal government, and that so many liberals believe themselves to be the heirs of the early Jefferson, who wanted little more than a police force and a judiciary. Always practical, Jefferson knew that certain men would rise through their own good efforts while, sadly, others would fall. Government would do no more than observe this Darwinian spectacle benignly, and provide no succor.
In 1800 the Hamiltonian view was rejected by the people and their new President Thomas Jefferson. Four years later, the Hamiltonian view had prevailed and was endorsed by the reelected Jefferson. Between 1800 and 1805 Jefferson had seen to it that an empire in posse had become an empire in esse. The difference between Jefferson I and Jefferson II is reflected in the two inaugural addresses.
It is significant that nothing more elevated than greed changed the Dr. Jekyll of Jefferson I into the Mr. Hyde of Jefferson II. Like his less thoughtful countrymen, Jefferson could not resist a deal. Subverting the Constitution he had helped create, Jefferson bought Louisiana from Napoleon, acquiring its citizens without their consents. The author of The Declaration of Independence was quite able to forget the unalienable rights of anyone whose property he thought should be joined to our empire — a word which crops up frequently and unselfconsciously in his correspondence.
In the course of land-grabbing, Jefferson II managed to get himself into hot water with France, England, and Spain simultaneously, a fairly astonishing thing to do considering the state of politics in Napoleonic Europe.
Jefferson made it possible for______.
选项
A、a potential empire to become a real one
B、tax laws to reflect the will of the people
C、France, England, and Spain to simultaneously vacillate upon their mutual feelings towards the United States
D、Darwinian social theories to be accepted without question
答案
A
解析
根据倒数第三段中的“Between 1800 and 1805 Jefferson had seen to it that an empire in posse had become an empire in esse.”可知,杰斐逊已经确保一个潜在的帝国成为真正的帝国。据此可知,A项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NZUO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Scientistshavelongunderstoodthatsupermassiveblackholesweighingmillionsorbillionsofsunscantearapartstarsthatco
Smoking,whichmaybeapleasureforsomepeople,isaseruioussourceofdiscomfortfortheirfellows.【C1】______,medicalautho
MichaelYessis,anemeritusprofessorofSportsScienceatCaliforniaStateUniversity,maintainsthat"geneticsonlydetermines
LeaksfromEdwardSnowden,asystem’sadministratorturnedwhistleblowerattheNationalSecurityAgency(NSA),America’ssignals
Sleepisanimportantpartofourlives.Wespendaboutone-thirdofourlivessleeping.Formillionsofpeople,【C1】______,gett
Sleepisanimportantpartofourlives.Wespendaboutone-thirdofourlivessleeping.Formillionsofpeople,【C1】______,gett
Ishallmentiontwoorthreemattersinwhichtheneedforcooperationbetweenphilosophyandscienceisespeciallyintimate.【T
Themomentsomeonebrokeintothefactory,aburglar______ranginthepolicestation.
Weallbuythingsonthe______ofthemoment;thisiswhattheretailtradecallsan"impulsebuy".(2007年中国科学院考博试题)
Theatmosphereisasmuchapartoftheearthas______itssoilsandthewaterofitslakes,riversandoceans.
随机试题
以下选项不属于机油压力过低的故障原因。()
下列表现不符合心理防御机制中“文饰”的是()
关于胸椎侧位摄影的叙述,错误的是
A.处方药B.现代药C.传统药D.非处方药E.调配、销售警示语或忠告语为“凭医师处方销售、购买和使用!”的为()
采用光电输入法OMR技术输入数据,是将欲输入的数据在OMR表上直接按规则填写数字即可。( )
参观游览中的导游服务是指进入景点后的导游服务。()
旅游接待计划是组团旅行社委托各地方接待旅行社组织落实旅游活动的()
WhichoffollowingistheScottishpoetwhowriteARed,RedRose?
反应变量应具备的特点有()。
SOL语句不能创建的是
最新回复
(
0
)