首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2019-09-23
20
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
The word "comet" underlined in Paragraph 3 refers to______.
选项
A、an event that could have obscured the geological record
B、a possible cause for the decline of brachiopods
C、massive ecological or geological changes
D、the acceleration of evolutionary adaptation
答案
B
解析
推断题。第3段第6句首先提出不论是什么原因造成大规模死亡,破折号之后补充说明蛤类比腕足动物更经受得住生存环境的巨变,由此可以推断答案选B。comet之前的or是连接不同可能性的连词“或”,不要误读为表示解释功能的“即,亦即”。所以不可选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NtMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Despite(1)thatalcoholicbeveragesmay(2),aleadingmedicalexpertisadvising:don’t(3)justyet.Anybodywho’sever
Formorethantwocenturies,American’scollegesanduniversitieshavebeenthebackboneofthecountry’sprogress.Theyhaveed
A、Theshipwasluxuriouslydecorated.B、Theshipwascarryingseveralmilliondollars.C、Theshiphadsomeprecioussculptureso
RichDiseasesinPoorCountriesNon-communicablediseasesusedtobearich-worldproblem.Atthattime,peopleinpoorcount
MalnutritionandtheDiseasesofPovertyMalnutritiondisproportionatelyaffectsthoseinsub-SaharanAfrica.Over35percent
Whichofthefollowingisclosestinmeaningtothestatementyou’vejustheard?
Asmallpieceoffisheachdaymaykeeptheheart【C1】______away.That’sthe【C2】______ofanextensivestudyofDutchmeninwhich
Peopleshouldbereadytosavethemselvesinsteadofcountingsolelyonthegovernment.
Atotalof4.6milliondigitaltelevisionshavebeensold,andthesalesofHDTVsetshavequadrupledsincelastyear.Consumers
Furthermore,thecampaignitselfwaslavishlyfinanced,withplentyofmoneyfortop-flightstaff,travel,andtelevisioncommer
随机试题
达文斯是英国一家钢铁制造商,他与营业地在美国的海曼订立一项代理合同,指定海曼为达文斯在美国的独家代理,双方在合同中约定于1938年开始执行此合同。合同中仲裁条款规定:“由于本合同引起的任何争议,应当通过仲裁解决。"后来,达文斯拒绝履行合同,海曼诉诸法院,指
《张中丞传后叙》所歌颂的三个正面人物是
LastweekLindahadajobinterview,butshewasafewminuteslate.Wilson【C1】______theofficewhenshegotthere.Hissecretar
A、氯化物B、硫酸盐C、铁盐D、砷盐E、澄清度;以下方法所检查的杂质是在盐酸溶液中,与氯化钡溶液反应,形成白色浑浊液
正确使用舌下片的方法是一般控制含服时间
某项目专业性强且技术复杂,开工后,由于专业原因该项目的项目经理不能胜任该项目,为了保证项目目标的实现,企业更换了项目经理。企业的此行为属于项目目标动态控制中的()。
下列选项中,不属于现金流量三要素的是()
下列关于行业财务风险分析指标的说法,正确的有()。
下列关于保证的表述,错误的是()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 C本题属于九宫格类图形推理。以中间的“太极”图形为中心,与它相邻的图形都是开放图形,与它相对的图形都是封闭图形,所以只能选C。
最新回复
(
0
)