首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
admin
2012-06-13
90
问题
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is we are terrible at predicting the source of joy. And whatever choices we do make, we likely later decide it was all for the best.
These are insights from happiness economics, perhaps the hottest field in what used to be called the dismal science. Happiness is everywhere—on the best-seller lists, in the minds of policymakers, and front and center for economists—yet it remains elusive. The golden rule of economics has always been that well-being is a simple function of income. That’s why nations and people alike strive for higher incomes—money gives us choice and a measure of freedom. After a certain income cap, we simply don’t get any happier. And it isn’t what we have, but whether we have more than our neighbor, that really matters. So the news last week that in 2006 top hedge-fund managers took home $ 240 million, minimum, probably didn’t make them any happier, it just made the rest of us less so.
Now policymakers are racing to figure out what makes people happy, and just how they should deliver it. Countries as diverse as Bhutan, Australia, China, Thailand and the UK are coming up with "happiness indexer," to be used alongside GDP as a guide to society’s progress. In Britain, the "politics of happiness" will likely figure prominently in next year’s elections. Never mind that the world’s top happiness researchers recently gathered at a conference in Rome to debate whether joy is even measurable.
Why is this all happening now? Only in the last decade have economists, psychologists, biologists and philosophers begun cross-pollinating in such a way to arrive at "happiness studies. " Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert humorously sums up much of the new wisdom in his book Stumbling on Happiness. He says 24-hour television and the Internet have allowed us all to see more seemingly happy people than ever before. "We’re sur-rounded by the lifestyles of the rich and famous," says Gilbert, "rubbing our noses in the fact that others have more. "
Of course, the idea that money isn’t the real key to happiness isn’t new. The 18th-century British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham argued that public policy should try to maximize happiness, and many prominent economists agreed but could not quite embrace the idea. There was just no way to measure happiness objectively.
One of the early revelations of happiness research, from Richard Easterlin at the University of Southern California, was that while the rich are typically happier than the poor, the happiness boost from extra cash isn’t that great once one rises above the poverty line. The reason, says Easterlin, is the "hedonic cycle": we get used to being richer darn quick, and take it for granted or compare it to what others have, not what we used to have. Turns out, keeping up with the Joneses is hard-wired into our brains, thanks to our pack-creature roots.
Though many happiness researchers say "work less, play more" is the formula for happiness, Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, suggests otherwise. Hard-working Americans ranks 17th on his list; the hard-vacationing French 39th. Human beings do want a European-style safety net, but also want freedom and opportunity.
And perhaps our intuitions about happiness should triumph over the fuzzy data, anyway. The economics of happiness has given us a couple of fairly hard and fast rules about well-being—being truly poor is bad, and time with friends and family are good. The good news is that whatever choices we make individually and as societies in the pursuit of happiness there’s good chance that they’ll seem better in hindsight. Yet another truism of happiness is that "we all wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to our past decision-making," says Gilbert. Today’s dreadful life choice will likely be tomorrow’s happy accident. Directions: The passage below summarizes the main points of the passage. Read the summary and then select the best word or phrase from the box blow according to the passage. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on the ANSWER SHEET with a single line through the center.
We are poor at prevision of the origin of happiness, and we would probably believe the decision we made is the most satisfactory. The Happiness has become (1) every-where but tough to define. Nations and people manage to gain higher incomes based on the principle of economics that (2) are related to happiness, but that is not (3) Wealth alone isn’t necessarily what makes us happy. It makes different if we possess more than (4) , and that’s why we feel unhappy to find those top (5) have superlative income. Some nations are beginning to consider issues like measuring society’s progress by (6) as well as GDP, and researchers even held seminar to exchange surveys about the (7) , though the influential topic was advanced 10 years ago. The issue that a state policy should be (8) the happiness of the majority, erupted many decades ago by British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham and accepted by many eminent economists, could not fairly (9) , because happiness can not be objectively measured. The (10) of the happiness made by Richard Easterlin is that the wealth makes people happier, but their happiness will not (11) as great as it should be if they live above the (12) The can easily take the life for granted and (13) the more expansive way of life. They are (14) to compare the life with others and manage to keep up with the Joneses. Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, does not support the (15) "work less, play more. " According to his investigation of happiness list, people want a European-style (16) and want to enjoy freedom and opportunity as well. We should probably go beyond the confusing information and (17) the fairly principles of the happiness; poverty is (18) , staying with friends and family is (19) , and the decisions made (20) are by chance to be happy experience.
选项
答案
M
解析
根据文中的“After a certain income cap,we simply don’t get any happier.”可知,收入增多并不会使我们幸福。所以应填“the case”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QCnO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
ThereisextraordinaryexposureintheUnitedStatestotherisksofinjuryanddeathfrommotorvehicleaccidents.Morethan8
HiswritingdepictsthischangingworldandtheincreasingculturaldiversityoftheUnitedStates.
Stockholderswhodonotgotomeetingsoftenvoteby______,whichmeansthattheydelegateinwritingtheirauthoritytovoteth
Advertisingisdistinguishedfromotherformsofcommunicationinthattheadvertiserpaysforthemessage______.
ThePublicBroadcastingSystemissupportedbydonationsfromfoundationsandothersources.
AlthoughKerryhashadnoformaleducation,heisoneofthe______businessmeninthecompany.
Stablepoliticalconditionsandfreedom(from)foreigninvasionenableacountrytodevelopitsnaturalresourcespeacefullyand
Hewearsstrangeclothes,talkstohimself,andappearsunkempt.Isitanywonderhisneighborsviewhimasaneccentric?
TheheadquartersofthistextilecompanyisinNewYorkwhileits20______companiesarelocatedindifferentpartsoftheworl
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"wasintheeyeofthebeholder.Kelley,whonor
随机试题
有以下程序#include<stdio.h>intfun(intx,inty){if(x!=y)return((x+y)/2);elsereturn
5岁男孩,发育较差,自幼易疲劳,安静时口周轻度发绀,哭闹时加重,胸骨左缘第3肋间可闻及Ⅲ级收缩期杂音,初步诊断为法洛四联症,检查结果正确的是
火的特性是
背景资料:某项目部在北方地区承担某城市主干路道路工程施工任务,设计快车道宽为11.25m,辅路宽为9m。项目部应业主要求,将原计划安排在次年4月初施工的沥青混凝土面层,提前到当年11月上、中旬,抢铺出一条快车道以缓解市交通。问题:为保证本次沥青面层
期货公司()负责监督期货投资咨询业务管理制度的制定和执行,对期货投资咨询业务的合规性定期检查,并依法履行督促整改和报告职责。
银行治理结构和制衡机制,对于健全公司治理和防范声誉风险都是至关重要的。然而,对于银行以及银行的责任人来说最终的保护方式是向所有员工逐步地灌输一种恪守高度的公平和道德行为准则的精神;让银行上下都明确一点,不可因某项交易,销售,贷款,客户和盈利机会而牺牲银行的
阅读下面材料,回答问题。相较于矿物燃料,生物燃料一直被人们视为“绿色能源”,而荷兰是世界公认的发展生物燃料的先行者。近年来,荷兰大量利用自东南亚进口的棕榈油生产生物燃料,以降低温室气体排放量。但是,荷兰科学家最近发现,随着荷兰等欧洲国家对东南亚棕榈油需求
教师的专业化就是为了提高教师的社会地位。
设有如下程序:PrivateSubForm_Click()num=InputBox("请输入一个实数"):p=InStr(num,".")Ifp>0ThenPrintMid(num,p+1)Els
PASSAGEFOURWhatisthispassagemainlyabout?
最新回复
(
0
)