首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
29
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
细节题。答案信息对应于第五段第一句,其中的this is virtually never allowed指的就是不允许媒体提前公布与审判有关的细节,即C 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Wherewastheletterprobablyplacedmanyyearsago?
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
Whatshouldonedoifhewantstoworkmoreefficientlyathislowpointinthemorning?
ThehistoryofresponsestotheworkoftheartistSandroBotticelli(1444-1510)suggeststhatwidespreadappreciationbycritic
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.
Ontheheelsofitsrecentdecisiontocriminalizeconsumerswhoripsongsfromalbumstheyhavepurchasedtotheircomputers(o
Morethan30,000driversandpassengerswhoseatinthefrontofthevehiclesarekilledorseriouslyinjuredeachyear.At
随机试题
如已确诊为造釉细胞瘤.为防止复发.其治疗原则为
内含手性立体异构体结构片段(1R,2S),有收缩血管和兴奋中枢神经作用的化物是()
某上市公司欲发行新股,但其不满足发行新股的条件,于是该公司委托了一家会计师事务所出示了一份虚假财务报表。该公司的证券承销商了解这一情况,但仍然代其发行新股。本事例中,下列哪些人属于《证券法》所指的虚假陈述人:
()具有抗冲击性好,破碎时产生辐射状裂纹,不伤人的特点。
推广创新针对小微企业、高校毕业生、城镇居民、特殊群体以及精准扶贫对象的小额贷款。()
Theclerktookdownthewoman’sparticulars.
在新建物业的移交过程中,移交方为()。
根据信息的来源,可将信息分为外部信息和内部信息;按照信息的用途又可分为经营决策信息、(64)和业务信息等。按信息的表示方式分为数字信息、(65)、图像信息和语言信息等。
在报表中添加时间时,Access将在报表上添加1个(),并将其“控件来源”属性设置为时间的表达式。
Whatdidthemandoabouthisoldcar?
最新回复
(
0
)