首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
admin
2013-01-20
38
问题
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical hypothesis is that hypnosis may be the product of "vivid imagination", a now discredited charge stemming from the observation that many people who are hypnotizable can be led to experience compellingly realistic auditory and visual hallucinations. Nothing that an auditory hallucination and the act of imagining a sound are both self-generated and that,like real hearing,a hallucination is experienced as the product of an external source, Henry Szechtman used PET (positron emission tomography) to image the brain activity of hypnotized subjects invited to imagine a scenario and then experiencing a hallucination. By monitoring regional blood flow in areas activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged"as authentic and originating in the outside world.
Szechtman imaged the brain activity of eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to hallucinate under hypnosis. During the session,the subjects were under hypnosis and lay in the PET scanner with their brain activity being monitored under four conditions:at rest;while hearing an audiotape of a voice,while imagining hearing the voice again;and during the auditory hallucination they experienced after being informed that the tape was playing once more,although it was not. The tests suggested that a region of the brain called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the vol-unteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the stimulus. In contrast, that brain area remained dormant while the subjects were imagining that they heard the stimulus.
The second major objection raised by critics argues that hypnosis’ ability to blunt pain results from either simple relaxation or a placebo response. McGlashan established that while hypnosis was only as effective in reducing pain as a sugar pill for poorly hypnotizable people,highly hypnotizable subjects benefited three times more from hypnosis than from the placebo. In response to these successes,Rainville devised experiments to determine which brain structures are involved in pain relief during hypnosis,attempting to locate the brain structures associated with the suffering component of pain,as distinct from its sensory aspects. Using PET, he and other scientists found that hypnosis reduced the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex—an area known to be involved in pain—but did not affect the activity of the somatosensory cortex, where the sensations of pain are processed.
Despite the value of these findings,the mechanisms underlying hypnotic pain relief are still poorly understood. The model favored by most researchers is that the analgesic effect of hypnosis occurs in higher brain centers than those involved in registering the painful sensation, accounting for the fact that most autonomic responses that routinely accompany pain—such as increased heart rate—are relatively unaffected by hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.
The research described in the passage is primarily concerned with answering which of the following questions?
选项
A、What research guarantees the reality of the effects that hypnosis has on brain activity, and what is their causal mechanism?
B、How are experiments devoted to disproving the "vivid imagination"objection to hypnosis different from those devoted to disproving the"placebo effecfthesis?
C、How can researchers reproduce the useful effects of hypnosis in a medical setting?
D、What technical advances have permitted researchers to reject skeptical explanations of the phenomenon of hypnosis?
答案
C
解析
内容理解题。问的是文章主要回答了那些问题。根据原文,第二段讲了催眠对大脑活动作用;第三段讲了催眠止痛的大脑机制问题。所以正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SN2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Iffullcreditsweregiventothispartitcould______ahighgradeforthestudentinhisphysicalcourse.
InatotalofsixstatesinthemiddleofAmerica,15,000assembly-lineworkersare【1】Japanesecarstogether.Theseautoworkers
Recentlyscientistshavebeen【1】andperfectingothersourcesofenergy:nuclearoratomicpower,solar(sun)power,andsyntheti
Generally,acomputerisanydevicethatcanperformnumericalcalculations.Currently,【1】,thetermusuallyrefers【2】anelectr
Thepolicemantriedto______theteenagedrivertoobeythetrafficlawsratherthanfinehimdirectly.
AnOhioStateUniversitystudyhaslinkedbehaviorinyoungchildren【1】thetypeofjobtheirmotherhas.Motherswithcomplexoc
Thereisperhapsnoothereventinthenaturalworldthatisascharacteristicofaseasonasafullchorusofspringpeepers.I
Therearesomanybadthingsaboutwomendrivers,Idon’tknowwheretostart.IguessIwillgettheballrollingbytalkingab
Ifyouworkforamajorcorporation,orarecontractedatone,soonerorlater,youmaybecalledupontocreateormaintainanint
Therearenationswhoselackofcontactwiththeoutsideworldhas______poverty.
随机试题
按照劳动合同期限的不同,劳动合同可分为()
胃肠激素的生理作用包括
组成中含有半夏、黄芩的方剂有
患者,男,24岁。夏秋季因饮食不慎出现泄泻腹痛,泻而不爽,胸腹满闷,口干不欲饮,舌苔微黄而腻,脉濡缓。此时应诊断为
限定放大摄影的放大倍数,取决于
某设备三年前购买的原始成本是90000元,目前的账面价值为40000元,经过评估,该设备现在的净残值为18000元。则在设备更新方案比选中,该设备的沉没成本是(A)元。
如何克服文学批评中的主观主义?如何恢复批评的尊严和功能?解决问题的办法,从根本上来说,还是要提高批评家的______素质。
有以下程序:#includeintf(intx,inty){return((y—x)*x);}voidmain(){inta=3,b=4,c=5,d;d=f(f(a,b),f(a,c));
A、 B、 C、 A
ThismonthSingaporepassedabillthatwouldgivelegalteethtothemoralobligationtosupportone’sparents.CalledastheM
最新回复
(
0
)