No one word demonstrated the shift in corporations’ attention in the mid-1990s from processes to people more vividly than the si

admin2017-06-29  34

问题     No one word demonstrated the shift in corporations’ attention in the mid-1990s from processes to people more vividly than the single word "talent". Behind the word lies the idea that more and more corporate【C1】______ is going to be created by knowledge and by so-called "knowledge workers". Manual【C2】______ is worth less; knowledge is worth more.
    This has【C3】______ shifted the balance of power in the recruitment process. Companies used to be relaxed about finding enough【C4】______ people to run their operations. What they could not find they would train, was the usual attitude. That might take some time, but in a world where people sought jobs for life time was in the company’s favour. But talent is not patient, and it is not【C5】______ . Many companies found themselves training employees only for them to go on and sell their acquired skills to their【C6】______ . So now they look for talent that is ready-made.
    In their eagerness to please this talent, companies have gone to【C7】______ lengths to appear especially attractive. They have, for instance, devoted a great deal of effort to the design of their websites, often the first port of call these days for bright young potential recruits. They have in many cases【C8】______ their HR departments, in part so that they can【C9】______ their remuneration (报酬) packages more finely for the individuals that they really require. And they have altered their approach to issues such as governance and environmental responsibility because they know that many of the talented people they are seeking want to work for【C10】______ and responsible employers.
A) subordinates E) rivals I) reconciled M) compromise
B) tailor F) reconstructed J) ethical N) faithful
C) significantly G) subjectively K) labour O) value
D) vigorous H) qualified L) considerable
【C6】

选项

答案E

解析 此处需填入名词,说明员工把培训所获得的劳动技能出售给了什么人。根据空格前的only for them to go on(只为自身进步),可知sell…to rivals“卖……给对手”符合语义逻辑,故rivals正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SfU7777K
0

最新回复(0)