首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
技术与天才哪个对科学发展更重要 ——1994年英译汉及详解 According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the hori
技术与天才哪个对科学发展更重要 ——1994年英译汉及详解 According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the hori
admin
2017-06-26
50
问题
技术与天才哪个对科学发展更重要
——1994年英译汉及详解
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.【F1】
Science moves forward, they say, not so much through the insights of great men of genius as because of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tools.
【F2】
"In short," a leader of the new school contends, "the scientific revolution, as we call it, was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments that expanded the reach of science in innumerable directions."
【F3】
Over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science.
The modern school that hails technology argues that such masters as Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, and inventors such as Edison attached great importance to, and derived great benefit from, craft information and technological devices of different kinds that were usable in scientific experiments.
The centerpiece of the argument of a technology-yes, genius-no advocate was an analysis of Galileo’s role at the start of the scientific revolution. The wisdom of the day was derived from Ptolemy, an astronomer of the second century, whose elaborate system of the sky put Earth at the center of all heavenly motions.【F4】
Galileo’ s greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolve around the sun rather than around the Earth.
But the real hero of the story, according to the new school of scientists, was the long evolution in the improvement of machinery for making eyeglasses.
Federal policy is necessarily involved in the technology vs. genius dispute.【F5】
Whether the Government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.
【F5】
选项
答案
政府究竟是应该通过减少对技术经费的投入来增加对纯理论科学的经费投入,还是相反,这往往取决于哪一方被视为驱动力。
解析
本句考查的重点是:主语从句和并列结构。 句子主干结构是:①表示选择意思的从句Whether the Government…or…“究竟是…还是…”作句子的主语,谓语和宾语是depends on the issue。②of which是宾语the issue的定语从句。increase thefinancing of pure science译为“增加对纯理论科学的经费投入”;at the expense of technology译为“减少对技术经费的投入”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TDbZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
"Itcan’tbethateveryannualsalarynegotiationmakesitastrainjusttobegintheschoolyear,"saidPresidentCristinaFer
Halfoftheworld’spopulationwillbespeakingorlearningEnglishby2015,researcherssay.Twobillionpeopleareexpectedto
Itwasthebiggestscientificgrudgematchsincethespacerace.TheGenomeWarshadeverything:twogroupswithappealingleade
Thetechnologicalrevolutionsofthelasttwodecadeshaveplacedasevereburdenontheconceptoftechnologytransfer.Itisq
【F1】Breathingparticulate-laden(akasmoggy)airmaybehardeningyourarteriesfasterthannormal,accordingtoresearchpublishe
Humanbeingshavetheuniqueabilitytoformulatepersonalgoalsforthemselves.Withoutthisformofpersonaldevelopment,the
Humanbeingshavetheuniqueabilitytoformulatepersonalgoalsforthemselves.Withoutthisformofpersonaldevelopment,the
Scientistsandcriticalthinkersalwaysuselogicalreasoning.【F1】Logicallowsustoreasoncorrectly,butitisacomplextopi
随机试题
多重趋避式冲突是指人们面对着两个或两个以上的目标,而目标又各自分别具有吸引和排斥两方面的作用,人们无法简单地选择一个目标而回避或拒绝另一个目标时的矛盾心态。根据上述定义,下列体现多重趋避式冲突的是:
腰椎穿刺后6h内让患者采取去枕仰卧位的目的是
患者胃脘疼痛,如针刺刀割,痛有定处,按之痛甚,食后加剧,入夜尤甚,舌质紫暗有瘀斑,脉涩。其治法是
下列选项中,不属于生产经营单位的主要负责人对本单位安全工作负有的责任的是()。下列说法不正确的是()。
只要实现了期初余额、本期发生额和期末余额三栏的平衡关系,就说明账户的记录是正确的。()
以下哪项中的画作不是我国著名画家齐白石的作品?()
《智慧女神报》
[2008年]在下列微分方程中以y=C1ex+C2cos2x+C3sin2x(C1,C2,C3为任意常数)为通解的是().
设任意一个十进制整数D,转换成对应的无符号二进制整数为B,那么就这两个数字的长度(即位数)而言,B与D相比_______。
Schoolsthroughouttheworldareexperiencingaperiodofrapidchangeand,inmanycases,arefindingthatextremely【M1】______
最新回复
(
0
)