首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Why Small Companies Will Win in This Economy I just heard a story from a client that’s hard to believe but true. In the
Why Small Companies Will Win in This Economy I just heard a story from a client that’s hard to believe but true. In the
admin
2012-06-20
35
问题
Why Small Companies Will Win in This Economy
I just heard a story from a client that’s hard to believe but true.
In the worst economy we’ve seen in decades, Passlogix, a privately owned 100-person software development company, just received over a million dollars in prepaid (预付的) commitments for the next three to five years of service. And they beat out several much larger more established companies, like CA (14,000 employees) and IBM (400,000 employees), to win those customers.
Now, how do you explain that? The bigger companies aren’t getting similar deals. It’s not standard in this industry to prepay contracts of that size and duration. And the clients received only a small reduction for their prepaid payment, less than the cost of capital.
I think it’s a trend. And understanding it might just be the difference between failing and thriving in this economy.
Yesterday morning I had breakfast with a good friend of mine, a counselor in the consulting industry. He’s a senior partner in a large consulting company and has worked in one large company or another for the past 35 years. Really smart, really talented.
And now really depressed. He hasn’t been having fun for some time but it’s got worse. He’s survived several rounds of layoffs but who knows, he tells me, he might be hit by the next one. And if he isn’t, he might leave anyway because it’s so miserable. He doesn’t understand how his company is making decisions, including how they decide whom to let go. He is one of the most senior leaders in this company and even he doesn’t trust it anymore.
This is not an isolated case. I’ve been hearing this from many of my large clients. People in senior positions don’t trust the decisions being handed to them. And if you go one layer down, to middle managers, the distrust is apparent. I don’t know a single person who works for a large company who feels confident they’ll have a job in 6 months. Not one.
Now, imagine you’re a client wanting to buy from one of these companies. You call up your client contact to talk about the sale. One of two things will happen:
1. You have a relationship with her and so you talk and get a sense of her insecurity, fear, and distrust.
2. You have no relationship with her because the company is so big and you talk to a different person each time you call.
Either way, you’ll probably get the sense that your contact may not be there in the future to fulfill her commitments to you. And that won’t make you comfortable committing long-term dollars (or any dollars) to the company.
Now compare that to Passlogix, whose clients know they can pick up the phone and speak with Marc Boroditsky, the CEO. He tells clients about his commitment to the company and to them, and they know exactly who to call if the work isn’t done to their expectations. That personal relationship, that trust, is important to them. They’re willing to invest in it long term — to the tune of millions of dollars, up front.
And it’s not just the CEO. If clients speak with other employees in the company, they’ll get the same feeling of trust. A small company gives its employees a sense of security and employees pass that feeling on to clients. Not that small companies don’t go out of business. They do all the time. But each employee has much greater control over his own destiny. In a company of 30 employees, if you do a great job, there is a good chance you’ll be recognized. But in a company of thousands? It’s easy to be missed. And easy to be laid off.
The gap of confidence between small companies and big ones is growing. We used to rely on the security of big companies. That’s why we worked for them. And hired them. And put our money in them.
But with the virtual collapse of AIG, Lehman, Citibank, GM, Chrysler, and many more — now even GE is in trouble — all that’s changed. Now it’s a risk to do business with the big ones.
We simply don’t trust companies anymore. We trust people. And in big companies, it’s hard to even find a person to trust as we scream "operator" into our telephones only to get transferred to another menu whose options have changed. That gives small companies a huge advantage.
Just ask John Drummond, who started Unicycle. com after getting laid off from IBM during the last downturn. Once he got the hang of it, he started Banjo, com, his other childhood passion. Both are doing well and he’s about to launch more sites.
There are hundreds of thousands of businesses like John’s. Small companies that aren’t making millions but provide a good living for the people who work in them. Small companies whose owners are trying to build sustainable businesses they love rather than fast-growing companies they can flip (抛出). They have no intention of retiring. They like working in them. And their clients know that, which is why they have a loyal customer base willing to invest in the relationship.
Big investment banks are burning — but lots of small firms, each with ten to twelve people, are opening up. And they’re doing well. They’ve gone back to the fundamentals. Finding a situation in which they have value to add and deals in which they are experts. And then sitting across from other people in the deal, building the relationship, making reasonable commitments, and following through.
Small companies with low operating expenses, reliable owners, a small number of committed employees, personal client relationships, and sustainable business models that drive a reasonable profit are the great opportunity of our time.
Small is the new big. Sustainable is the new growth. Trust is the new competitive advantage.
Between my starting this post and finishing it, Marc Boroditsky called to tell me he’s about to book another million-dollar prepaid, three-year contract with another client who said he’d lost trust in the other companies he’d been considering.
The client isn’t looking for a seller who has lots of time in the industry, or who’s highly capitalized, or who has a long list of big name clients and a flashy (浮华的) office. I’m sure those things don’t hurt. But it’s not what he’s looking for.
He’s looking for people he trusts. For a CEO who picks up the phone when it rings.
One factor that small companies enjoy great opportunity in this economy is that their employees are______to them.
选项
答案
committed
解析
空前的are表明,本空应填一形容词作表语。该段列举了小公司有更多良机的几个因素,其中提到一个因素是a small number of committed employees,即小公司的职员对公司很忠诚(committed),故答案为committed。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WKf7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Themanwantstogetauthorizationforaroomchange.B、Themanisworriedabouthisfriendshipwithhisroommate.C、Themann
China’sGrowthPosesOpportunityandRiskChinawelcomingforeigncompaniesandinvestmentWhenJapan,atthehighestpoint
Therearemany【B1】______aboutthebeginningofdramainancientGreece.Theonemostwidelyacceptedtodayisbasedontheassum
Drunkendriving,sometimescalledAmerica’ssociallyacceptedformofmurder,hasbecomeanationalepidemic(流行病).Everyhourof
Drunkendriving,sometimescalledAmerica’ssociallyacceptedformofmurder,hasbecomeanationalepidemic(流行病).Everyhourof
A、Shefeelsthathewon’tacceptanything.B、She’ssurehealreadyhasapocketcalculator.C、Shethinkshehasalmosteverythi
SigmundFreud,theworld-famousdoctorofVienna,wasathinkerwhochangedthewaywelookatmentaltrouble.Healsohada【S1】
Thepoliceman______himbypretendingtobeaprettyyounglady.
随机试题
关于肝局灶性结节增生的病理改变,下列描述哪项是错误的
肛门反射的神经定位是:
某患者因再生障碍性贫血需输血治疗,医嘱给予200ml新鲜血输注,当输注100ml左右患者发生寒战,继而诉头痛、恶心,测体温39.5℃,最初的处理应是
某景区多家旅行社、饭店、商店和客运公司共同签订《关于加强服务协同提高服务水平的决定》,约定了统一的收费方式、服务标准和收入分配方案。有人认为此举构成横向垄断协议。根据《反垄断法》,下列哪一说法是正确的?
请问“提示承兑”、“提示付款”各指什么?各自的期限是如何规定的?
战国屈原在开创一个与《诗经》风格迥异的南方楚辞文学流派的同时,也奠定了湖北文学的基石。()
Theunpopularmeasurefinally______thedownfallofthegovernment.
在关系窗口中,双击两个表之间的连接线,会出现
在考生文件夹下有一个数据库文件“samp2.accdb”,里面已经设计好3个关联表对象“tStud”、“tCourse”和“tScore”及一个临时表对象“tTemp”。请按以下要求完成设计。创建一个查询,查找并显示入校时间非空的男同学的“学号”、“姓
A、 B、 C、 A
最新回复
(
0
)