首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
50
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Theincreasedavailabilityofcopyrightedmaterialduetothedevelopmentofinformationtechnologyhasfurtheredthedebateas
TheDecLarationofIndependencewasadoptedbythe________ContinentalCongressonJuly4,________.
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
Oriolesarearborealbirds,andwhentheydescendtotheground,itismainlytogethernestmaterials
Studentsfroma______backgroundhaveanadvantageatuniversity.
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
"Howmanycopiesdoyouwantprinted,Mr.Greeley?""Fivethousand!"Theanswerwassnappedbackwithouthesitation."But,
Wedidholdameetingyesterday,butyou______,sowedidnotinformyou.
Heaccepted______forthedamagedonetothecar.
随机试题
A.假小叶均较小,纤维间隔较薄,炎细胞浸润较轻B.假小叶大小不等,纤维间隔较厚,炎细胞浸润较重C.肝细胞桥接坏死,纤维条索增生,开始分隔肝小叶D.肝细胞大片崩解坏死,肝细胞再生结节,纤维组织增生E.肝细胞大片崩解坏死,肝细胞再生不明显,炎细胞浸润
关于全口牙列缺失患者软组织改变及异常现象,下列描述中错误的是
A.罹患率B.发病率C.患病率D.感染率E.发病比衡量人群中在短时间内新发病例的频率,采用的指标为
铁剂治疗缺铁性贫血的作用机制是
甲国M公司(买方)与乙国N公司(卖方)签订一进口香料合同,价格条件为CFR,装运港的检验证书作为议付货款的依据,但约定买方在目的港有复验权。货物在装运港检验合格后交由L公司运输。由于乙国当时出现疫情,船舶到达甲国目的港外时,甲国有关当局对船舶进行了长达几天
【背景资料】某化工生产设备安装工程项目,采用解体安装方法进行施工。某机电安装工程公司通过投标取得该项目的总承包施工任务。为了控制分包商的施工质量,业主分别与总承包方和分包方签订了工程施工总承包合同和分包合同。在合同履行过程中发生以下情况。
所有者权益的确认和计量,主要取决于资产、负债、收入、费用等其他会计要素的确认和计量。()
领导者放手不管,下属愿意怎样做就怎样做,完全自由。上述这种领导方式属于()领导方式。
A市税务局副处长汤某,出国考察返回时被A市海关在行李中查获若干黄色光盘。海关依法没收光盘并当场作出罚款1000元的处罚,并当场出具了罚款收据。A市税务局了解情况之后,又给予汤某撤职的行政处分。汤某对海关的行政处罚和税务局的行政处分均不服,分别以A市海关和A
Hewasorderedawayuponalong______totheice-coveredsouth,tomakewaruponthenativesthereandrobthemoftheirfurs.
最新回复
(
0
)