首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
89
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/a8tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
ThelatePresidentoftheschoolgraduatedfromafamousuniversity.Theunderlinedwordmeans______.
Idon’tthinkyouhavegotovertheseriousillnessafterarest,______?
Inthesentence"Shewalksoutofthehouse,followedbyalittleboy",thepastparticipleisusedas
Weallseeandhearaboutextraordinarypeoplearoundusandwonderwhywecan’tbemorelikethem.Sometimeswechuckthatnoti
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
A.appearanceB.appropriateC.attractiveD.complexE.concernF.coordinateG.decoratedH.entriesI.
Humanbodyneedsavarietyofessentialnutrientstofunctionproperly.Unlessyouarea【C1】______,youprobablydon’tknowwhat
Nowadays,WeChat’sfunctionsofShake-ShakeandDriftBottleallowuserstorandomlyconnecttootheruserscloseby.However,i
A、Eatinglargeamountsofprocessedmeatwillincreasetheriskofcancer.B、Eatingacertainkindofprocessedmeatwillleadt
随机试题
A、977.B、34,500.C、14000D、500A从“977womenquestionedforthesurvey”可知。
不属于抑癌基因的是
职能式组织结构的优点包括()。
要约回购是指公司在特定期间向股东发出的()。
下列关于普通股筹资定价的说法中,正确的是()。
在地面与墙脚交接处,通常按地面做法进行处理,即作为地面的延伸部分。这部分称踢脚线,也有的称踢脚板。其高度一般为()。
Thebedhasbeen______inthefamily.Itwasmygreat-grandmother’soriginally.
在C++中,cin是一个()。
FriendsMayBeKeytoLivingLongerLookingforthesecretofalonglife?Lookcloselyatyourfriends.Newresearchsuggestst
【B1】【B13】
最新回复
(
0
)