首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Plastic Surgery A better credit card is the solution to ever larger hack attacks [A]A thin magnetic stripe (magstrip
Plastic Surgery A better credit card is the solution to ever larger hack attacks [A]A thin magnetic stripe (magstrip
admin
2019-03-21
59
问题
Plastic Surgery
A better credit card is the solution to ever larger hack attacks
[A]A thin magnetic stripe (magstripe) is all that stands between your credit-card information and the bad guys. And they’ve been working hard to break in. That’s why 2014 is shaping up as a major showdown: banks, law enforcement and technology companies are all trying to stop a network of hackers who are succeeding in stealing account numbers, names, email addresses and other crucial data used in identity theft. More than 100 million accounts at Target, Neiman Marcus and Michaels stores were affected in some way during the most recent attacks, starting last November.
[B]Swipe (刷卡) is the operative word: cards are increasingly vulnerable to attacks when you make purchases in a store. In several recent incidents, hackers have been able to obtain massive information of credit-, debit- (借记) or prepaid-card numbers using malware, i. e. malicious software, inserted secretly into the retailers’ point-of-sale system—the checkout registers. Hackers then sold the data to a second group of criminals operating in shadowy corners of the web. Not long after, the stolen data was showing up on fake cards and being used for online purchases.
[C]The solution could cost as little as $ 2 extra for every piece of plastic issued. The fix is a security technology used heavily outside the U. S. While American credit cards use the 40-year-old magstripe technology to process transactions, much of the rest of the world uses smarter cards with a technology called EMV (short for Europay, MasterCard, Visa) that employs a chip embedded in the card plus a customer PIN (personal identification number) to authenticate (验证 ) every transaction on the spot. If a purchaser fails to punch in the correct PIN at the checkout, the transaction gets rejected. (Online purchases can be made by setting up a separate transaction code. )
[D]Why haven’t big banks adopted the more secure technology? When it comes to mailing out new credit cards, it’s all about relative costs, says David Robertson, who runs the Nilson Report, an industry newsletter. " The cost of the card, putting the sticker on it, coding the account number and expiration date, embossing (凸印) it, the small envelope—all put together, you’re in the dollar range. " A chip-and-PIN card currently costs closer to $3, says Robertson, because of the price of chips. (Once large issuers convert together, the chip costs should drop. )
[E]Multiply $ 3 by the more than 5 billion magstripe credit and prepaid cards in circulation in the U. S. Then consider that there’s an estimated $ 12. 4 billion in card fraud on a global basis, says Robertson. With 44% of that in the U. S. , American credit-card fraud amounts to about $5.5 billion annually. Card issuers have so far calculated that absorbing the liability for even big hacks like the Target one is still cheaper than replacing all that plastic.
[F]That leaves American retailers pretty much alone the world over in relying on magstripe technology to charge purchases—and leaves consumers vulnerable. Each magstripe has three tracks of information, explains payments security expert Jeremy Gumbley, the chief technology officer of CreditCall, an electronic-payments company. The first and third are used by the bank or card issuer. Your vital account information lives on the second track, which hackers try to capture. " Malware is scanning through the memory in real time and looking for data," he says. " It creates a text file that gets stolen. "
[G]Chip-and-PIN cards, by contrast, make fake cards or skimming impossible because the information that gets scanned is encrypted (加密). The historical reason the U. S. has stuck with magstripe, ironically enough, is once superior technology. Our cheap, ultra-reliable wired networks made credit-card authentication over the phone frictionless. In France, card companies created EMV in part because the telephone monopoly was so maddeningly inefficient and expensive. The EMV solution allowed transactions to be verified locally and securely.
[H]Some big banks, like Wells Fargo, are now offering to convert your magstripe card to a chip-and-PIN model. (It’s actually a hybrid (混合体) that will still have a magstripe, since most U. S. merchants don’t have EMV terminals. ) Should you take them up on it? If you travel internationally, the answer is yes.
[I]Keep in mind, too, that credit cards typically have better liability protection than debit cards. If someone uses your credit card fraudulently (欺诈性地), it’s the issuer or merchant, not you, that takes the hit. Debit cards have different liability limits depending on the bank and the events surrounding any fraud. " If it’s available, the logical thing is to get a chip-and-PIN card from your bank," says Eric Adamowsky, a co-founder of CreditCardInsider. com. "I would use credit cards over debit cards because of liability issues. " Cash still works pretty well too.
[J]Retailers and banks stand to benefit from the lower fraud levels of chip-and-PIN cards but have been reluctant for years to invest in the new infrastructure (基础设施) needed tor the technology, especially if consumers don’t have access to it. It’s a chicken-and-egg problem: no one wants to spend the money on upgraded point-of-sale systems that can read the chip cards if shoppers aren’t carrying them—yet there’s little point in consumers’ carrying the fancy plastic if stores aren’t equipped to use them. (An earlier effort by Target to move to chip and PIN never gained progress. ) According to Gumbley, there’s a "you-first mentality. The logjam (僵局) has to be broken. "
[K]JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently expressed his willingness to do so, noting that banks and merchants have spent the past decade suing each other over interchange fees—the percentage of the transaction price they keep—rather than deal with the growing hacking problem. Chase offers a chip-enabled card under its own brand and several others for travel-related companies such as British Airways and Ritz-Carlton.
[L]The Target and Neiman hacks have also changed the cost calculation: although retailers have been reluctant to spend the $ 6. 75 billion that Capgemini consultants estimate it will take to convert all their registers to be chip-and-PIN-compatible, the potential liability they now face is dramatically greater. Target has been hit with class actions from hacked consumers. " It’s the ultimate nightmare," a retail executive from a well- known chain admitted to -TIME.
[M]The card-payment companies MasterCard and Visa are pushing hard for change. The two firms have warned all parties in the transaction chain—merchant, network, bank—that if they don’t become EMV-compliant by October 2015, the party that is least compliant will bear the fraud risk.
[N]In the meantime, app-equipped smartphones and digital wallets—all of which can use EMV technology—are beginning to make inroads (侵袭) on cards and cash. PayPal, for instance, is testing an app that lets you use your mobile phone to pay on the fly at local merchants—without surrendering any card information to them. And further down the road is biometric authentication, which could be encrypted with, say, a fingerprint.
[O]Credit and debit cards, though, are going to be with us for the foreseeable future, and so are hackers, if we stick with magstripe technology. "It seems crazy to me," says Gumbley, who is English, " that a cutting-edge-technology country is depending on a 40-year-old technology. " That’s why it may be up to consumers to move the needle on chip and PIN. Says Robertson: " When you get the consumer into a position of worry and inconvenience, that’s where the rubber hits the road. "
While many countries use the smarter EMV cards, the U. S. still clings to its old magstripe technology.
选项
答案
C
解析
[C]段提到,当美国人还在使用40年前的磁条技术来处理信用卡交易的时候,国外大部分国家都在使用一种名为芯片卡技术的信用卡,这种卡片更智能。题干是对定位句的转述,故答案为[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/d7H7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
自从1978年市场化改革(marketreforms)以来,中国经济已经逐渐从集中的计划经济向市场经济转变,中国经济和社会发展迅速。
Mostofusareacutelyawareofhowmuchmobiledataweconsumeonourphonesandtablets.That’sbecauseAmericansarelargely
Mostofusareacutelyawareofhowmuchmobiledataweconsumeonourphonesandtablets.That’sbecauseAmericansarelargely
A、Heartdiseasecausedbyhighbloodpressure.B、Healthproblemsassociatedwithpollution.C、Leadingriskfactorsforheartdis
Wemightbelivingforlongerthanever,butwearesick.About95percentofpeoplehaveatleastonehealthcomplaint,witha
Waffles?Frenchtoast?Bacon?Bigbreakfastsmaybeathingofthepast.AccordingtotheAssociatedPress,moreAmericansarec
A、ItisthedreamoftheAmericantoleadacommonlife.B、ItisthehopeoftheAmericantohaveabetterqualityoflife.C、It
HowtoKeepYourNewYear’sResolutions[A]AbouthalfofallAmericanadultssaytheyareatleastsomewhatlikelytomakeaNe
随机试题
患儿,男,5岁。体检时发现在胸骨左缘第3~4肋间可闻及全收缩期杂音伴震颤,P2轻度亢进,其余无特殊不适,体质虚弱,发育较同龄儿差。为明确诊断的无创性检查是
能增加肾血流量,明显舒张肾血管的药物是
A.耐受性B.依赖性C.耐药性D.继发反应E.特异质反应连续用药后,病原体对药物的敏感性降低称为
患者,女性,35岁。因腹泻每日10~15次,粪便为米泔水样来院就诊,患者轻度脱水,结合患者症状和医生查体结果,高度怀疑为霍乱。正在等待实验室检查结果以明确诊断。该患者经检查确认为霍乱需隔离治疗。护士应告知其家属,隔离期限是
梁式桥上部承重构件有严重的异常位移,存在失稳现象,在其技术状况评定中,可直接评定为5类桥。()
客户档案主要包括()。
根据个人独资企业法律制度的规定.下列关于个人独资企业投资人的表述中,正确的是()。
某单位要从8名职员中选派4人去总公司参加培训,其中甲和乙2人不能同时参加。问共有多少种选派方法?()
[2012年]已知函数f(x)满足方程f″(x)+f′(x)一2f(x)=0及f″(x)+f(x)=2ex.求曲线y=f(x2)∫0xf(一t2)dt的拐点.
讨论方程axex+b=0(a>0)实根的情况。
最新回复
(
0
)