首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
43
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are very worried.
C、The may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第一段第四句指出,电磁场与疾病有关的暗示让人不安,因为我们每个人都与这种磁场存在联系,比如使用电器、电线、天线、电脑和微波炉都会产生磁场。由此可推断,普通人在读了这篇文章后,可能会担心自己所使用的电器会导致疾病,从而会注意减少对电器的使用,故答案为[C]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
转基因作物
semantictranslation
ItamazesmeeverytimeIencountersuperstitionsoroldwives’talesthatgetinthewayofgoodthingshappening,eventhough
TheToriesweretheforerunnersof________,whichstillbearsthisnicknametoday.
Whilethishealthylifestyleapproachtohealthworkedforsome(thewealthymembersofsociety),peopleexperiencingpoverty,u
ThenewtechnologicalrevolutioninAmericannewspapershasbroughtincrease______,awiderrangeofpublicationsandanexpans
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
"Howmanycopiesdoyouwantprinted,Mr.Greeley?""Fivethousand!"Theanswerwassnappedbackwithouthesitation."But,
Thisisnotagoodtimetobeforeign.Anti-immigrantpartiesaregaininggroundinEurope.Britainhasbeenfrettingthisweek
Despitesomedirepredictionsattheweekend,financialmarketshavebeenremarkably______inthefaceoftheParisattacks,wh
随机试题
表示一组观察值的平均水平或集中趋势的统计指标是
水利水电工程项目划分中,具有独立发挥作用或独立施工条件的建筑物为()工程。
消费者价格指数与生产者价格指数不同是因为它们()。[2007年真题]
下列不属于商业银行合规管理体系基本要素的是()。
下列句子中,没有歧义的是()。
简述心智技能的培养要求。
宪法具有最高的法律效力,一切规范性文件都不得与宪法相抵触。()
电影诞生的心理学基础是()和视觉暂留。
已知函数f(x)满足方程f”(x)+f’(x)一2f(x)=0及f”(x)+f(x)=2ex,(1)求f(x)的表达式;(2)求曲线y=f(x2)∫0xf(-t2)dt的拐点.
设A,B为n阶对称矩阵,下列结论不正确的是().
最新回复
(
0
)