首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
54
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
There’sadirtylittleSecretinmanyAmericanhomes--couplesfightaboutthehousework.It’sNo.1issuemyhusbandandIargue
AccordingtoLouisSeck,theIsraeliproject______.
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
Gulliver’sTravelswaswrittenby______.
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
AccordingtotheSpeechActTheory,whenaspeakeruttersasentencetomakeastatementortomakeanoffer,heisperformingt
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessitisyourownoroneclearlyinapublicplace.Or【M1
TheSeattleTimesCompanyisonenewspaperfirmthathasrecognizedtheneedforchangeanddonesomethingaboutit.Inthene
A、JabalitoldapressconferencethatIsraeliarmywereresponsibleforthedeathofthetwoteenagers.B、AnIsraeliarmyspokes
随机试题
A.创伤性关节炎B.外翻畸形C.外伤性移位D.关节僵硬E.关节积液胫骨上段骨折易造成
字母Z表示字母H表示
桥梁荷载试验时,应选择温度较稳定时的时段进行。()
原始凭证有错误的,应当由出具单位重开,不得在原始凭证上更正的情况适用于()。
以下不属于重工业的是()。
某公司销售商品均采用赊销方式,预计的年度赊销收入为5000万元,信用条件是(3/10,2/20,N/45),其变动成本率为40%,资本成本率为10%,收账费用为120万元。预计占赊销额60%的客户会利用3%的现金折扣,占赊销额18%的客户会利用2%的现金折
IfoundthebookI______I______intheteachers’room!Whatahappyafternoon!
在课程改革的背景下,有人认为如果评价方式不能得到相应改革,课程改革的目标就不可能真正实现,因此评价改革的问题应是基本的问题。请用相关知识分析评价改革的必要性和方向。
如果有以下定义及初始化:inta=3,*p:&a;则由此可以推断,*p的值是()。
Haveyouevernoticedthatthereisnoshortageofpeoplewillingtogiveyouadvice,whetherornotyouaskforit?I’ve【T1】___
最新回复
(
0
)