2. 考研
  3. For more than two decades, U.S. courts have been limiting affirmative-action programs in universities and other areas. The legal

For more than two decades, U.S. courts have been limiting affirmative-action programs in universities and other areas. The legal

admin2017-11-14  11
问题     For more than two decades, U.S. courts have been limiting affirmative-action programs in universities and other areas. The legal rationale is that racial preferences are unconstitutional, even those intended to compensate for racism or intolerance. For many colleges, this means students can be admitted only on merit, not on their race or ethnicity. It has been a divisive issue across the U.S., as educators blame the prolonged reaction to affirmative-action for declines in minority admissions. Meanwhile, activists continue to battle race preferences in courts from Michigan to North Carolina.
    Now, chief executives of about two dozen companies have decided to plunge headfirst into this politically unsettled debate. They, together with 36 universities and 7 non-profitable organizations, formed a forum that set forth an action plan essentially designed to help colleges circumvent court-imposed restrictions on affirmative action. The CEOs’ motive: "Our audience is growing more diverse, so the communities we serve benefit if our employees are racially and ethnically diverse as well" , says one CEO of a company that owns nine television stations.
    Among the steps the forum is pushing; finding creative yet legal ways to boost minority enrollment through new admissions policies; promoting admissions decisions that look at more than test scores; and encouraging universities to step up their minority outreach and financial aid. And to counter accusations by critics to challenge these tactics in court, the group says it will give legal assistance to colleges sued for trying them. "Diversity diminished by the court must be made up for in other legitimate, legal ways, " says, a forum member.
    One of the more controversial methods advocated is the so-called 10% rule. The idea is for public universities—which educate three-quarters of all U.S. undergraduates—to admit students who are in the top 10% of their high school graduating class. Doing so allows colleges to take minorities who excel in average urban schools, even if they wouldn’t have made the cut under the current statewide ranking many universities use.
If the 10% rule is applied, _________.
选项 A、the best white high school students can get into colleges
B、public universities can get excellent students
C、students from poor rural families can go to colleges
D、good minority students can get into public universities
答案D
解析 事实细节题。根据题干关键词the 10％rule定位到第四段。该段提到，该规则将使公立大学录取在高中毕业班排名前10％的学生。这种方法也使公立大学能招收到一般城市学校中名列前茅的少数民族学生，因此D项正确。A项和B项本身表述并没有错，但都是泛泛而谈，没有具体提到“公立大学”或“少数民族学生”，所以不是最佳答案。C项在文中根本没有涉及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kvIZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)