首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Clean Energy Transition Will Transform Our Economy Beyond Recognition [A] In November 2013, more than 15,000 scientists r
The Clean Energy Transition Will Transform Our Economy Beyond Recognition [A] In November 2013, more than 15,000 scientists r
admin
2020-11-04
33
问题
The Clean Energy Transition Will Transform Our Economy Beyond Recognition
[A] In November 2013, more than 15,000 scientists reissued a warning to humanity of "widespread misery and catastrophic (灾难性的) biodiversity loss" unless business-as-usual changed. " By failing to adequately limit population growth, reassess the role of an economy rooted in growth, reduce greenhouse gases, incentivize renewable energy, protect habitat, restore ecosystems, curb pollution, and constrain invasive alien species, humanity is not taking the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperiled (受到威胁的) biosphere," they wrote.
[B] Former UN climate chief Christiana Flgueres and physicist Stefan Rahmstorf last year warned that the world has approximately three years before the worst effects of climate change become inevitable. In an open letter they urged companies, communities, countries and citizens to cut carbon emissions now, arguing that failure means fires, floods, droughts, rising sea levels, extreme weather, agricultural losses and massive insurance costs. Between 2008 and 2016, climate related disasters displaced 21.5 million people.
[C] Humanity is in a horse race with catastrophe. The good news is that we are in the race. But even if we win, it will change our economy beyond recognition. We have the technologies to solve the worst of the crises facing us, and buy the time to deal with the rest. Back in 2009, Stanford scientist Dr. Mark Jacobson said that renewable energy could power the entire world by 2030. His Solutions Project calculated how to do this for every state in the US and many countries. More recently, scholars like Christian Breyer have shown how to do this with photovoltaics (太阳光能) alone.
[D] Stanford Professor Tony Seba argues that not only is the transition to renewables possible, it is inevitable. In his book Clean Disruption Seba describes how the convergence of disruptive technologies and business models makes a renewable world inevitable. He focuses on four factors; the fall in the cost of solar energy, the fall in the cost of storage (batteries), the rise of the electric vehicle, and the advent of the driverless car.
[E] These innovations, he argues, by delivering renewably powered, electric vehicle transit as a service will be ten times cheaper than current private ownership of internal combustion (内燃机) cars. In the process, the shift to EVs will move us to a completely renewable energy system. He reminds doubters that experts totally underestimated sales of mobile phones. In the 1990s, McKinsey told ATT to expect 900,000 mobile subscribers by the year 2000. They were off by 108 million. By 2014 there were more mobile phones on earth than the seven billion people, increasing five times faster than humans.
[F] A new solar array goes up in the US every 150 seconds, but can the whole world be renewable by 2030? Yes, because the cost of solar is falling rapidly. So we can run our society on solar energy, but what if the sun isn’t shining or the wind blowing?
[G] Storage technology to make renewable energy available is only in its infancy as an industry, but its prices are falling, too. When the Aliso Canyon natural gas well blew out, spewing 100,000 metric tons of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, the local utility feared it would be unable to keep lights on in Southern California. In record time, Tesla and others brought online more than 70 megawatts of energy storage at a price cheaper than building a new gas peaking plant, and vastly faster.
[H] In late 2016 the Financial Times reported that Fitch Ratings warned: "Widespread adoption of battery-powered vehicles is a serious threat to the oil industry," noting that transport accounted for 55 percent of total oil use in 2014. In the US it accounted for 71 percent of of oil use, according to 2016 figures. It endangers the banks, as well: a quarter of all corporate debt, perhaps as much as $3. 4 trillion, is related to utility and car company bonds that are tied to fossil fuel use.
[I] Anyone doubting this risk must have been sobered when, in September 2017, China announced it was going to phase out internal combustion vehicles. Given that China represents a quarter of the global automobile market, this—coupled with India, France, the UK, and Norway making similar announcements—is an existential crisis for both the oil and car industries.
[J] About a week after China’s announcement, Jerry Brown, the Governor of California, the world’s fifth largest economy, asked Mary Nichols, head of the state’s Air Resources Board, whether California could do the same. Two days later she said yes. Two days later Jerry said then we will. That was a Friday. On the Monday, General Motors, which had reclaimed its coveted status of the world’s leading automobile manufacturer on the strength of its Bolt electric car, announced that its future is electric. Meanwhile, Daimler, Volkswagen and Volvo have committed to electrifying their entire product portfolios.
[K] We’re three for three on Seba’s predictions. But in Seba’s scenario it’s the autonomous (自动的) electric vehicle (AEV) that drives the real reduction in cost he claims will make the disruption inevitable. Are AEVs more than just science fiction?
[L] To get the straight story, I talked to Tom Chi, the head of Product Experience at Google X and one of the designers of the self-driving Google car. "Within ten years?" asked Tom. "Easy. " Tesla, he said, released its driverless vehicle when it was as safe as a human driven car. Remember, hundreds of thousands of people die every year in car crashes. Teslas have driven more than 5 billion miles in autonomous mode, en route to the company’s 10 billion mile safety proof point. In fact, all Teslas are now capable of full autonomous mode. The Google car has driven four million real miles, and 2. 5 billion simulated miles. GM just announced that it is pivoting its business model to offer autonomous electric vehicle transit as a service by 2019.
[M] Does that make it four for four? Is Tony right? You decide. But realize that if the evidence laid out here is true, it has profound implications for everything. It will mean the dissolution in value, likely complete loss of the oil, gas, coal, nuclear, utility, auto industries, the banks that hold the loan paper for all of these companies and the pension funds arid insurance companies that are invested in them.
[N] It will mean an economic collapse on a scale never seen coming at us within about 10 years. Consider oil. In 2011, Carbon Tracker calculated that at least 80 percent of the fossil deposits still in the ground would have to stay in the ground if the world is to avoid warming beyond 2℃ more than pre-industrial levels. Given that those fossil assets are on the balance sheets of some of the world’s wealthiest companies and form the basis of the sovereign wealth funds of many nations around the world, John Fullerton of the Capital Institute predicted that this Implied a write-off of at least $20 trillion dollars. In contrast, Fullerton warned, the 2008 financial collapse was triggered by the stranding of only $2. 7 trillion in mortgage assets.
[O] What can be done? It appears unwise to have any of your assets in the industries that will be disrupted. Bevis Longstreth, former Securities and Exchange Commissioner, observed; "It is entirely plausible, even predictable, that continuing to hold equities in fossil fuel companies will be ruled negligence. "
[P] Is your job at risk? Companies will either become part of the solution, or they won’t be a problem because they won’t be around. The emerging industries are creating millions of jobs, but millions are at risk. Will we substitute a Universal Basic Income? Will we descend into unimaginable darkness? Or will we create a Finer Future? Either way, we will totally transform the global economy. The crises we face and the inevitabilities of change described here will drive this change.
It is said that the global energy supply can be satisfied by renewable sources by 2030.
选项
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mCP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Refundingforgoodsreturned.B、Freeinstallingofappliances.C、Prolongedgoodswarranty.D、Complimentarytailoring.D对话中,男士对
A、Itwillworkcloselywiththegovernment.B、Itwillendeavortowriteoffbadloans.C、Itwilltrytolowertheinterestrate.
A、Tofightchildhoodobesity.B、Tohelpdisadvantagedkids.C、Toencouragekidstoplaymoresports.D、Tourgekidstofollowth
A、Thanksyourchildrenfordoingsomethingbeyondtheirresponsibility.B、Regardpraiseasaresponsibilityanddoitregularly.
A、Itsavestime.B、Itincreasesparkingcapacity.C、Itensuresdrivers’safety.D、Itreducescardamage.B
InequalityIsNotInevitable[A]Adangeroustrendhasdevelopedoverthispastthirdofacentury.Acountrythatexperiencedsh
InequalityIsNotInevitable[A]Adangeroustrendhasdevelopedoverthispastthirdofacentury.Acountrythatexperiencedsh
ReformandMedicalCosts[A]Americansaredeeplyconcernedabouttherelentlessriseinhealthcarecostsandhealthinsurancep
A、Whentheyaremotivated.B、Whentheyarerelaxed.C、Whentheyfeelexcited.D、Whentheyenjoyautonomy.B在录音中间部分,演讲者提到“我不会给他们太
A、46%ofthem.B、47%ofthem.C、62%ofthem.D、66%ofthem.B录音提到,66%的受访者认为美国贫富矛盾“严重”和“非常严重”,比2009年的47%上升许多,问题是问2009年的比例值,所以B项是正
随机试题
下列关于现值的说法,正确的是()。
A、药品监督管理部门B、卫生行政部门C、经济贸易部门D、劳动和社会保障部门E、社会发展计划部门对药品、药事组织和药师进行行政管理的政府部门是
DNA分子的一级结构是由许多脱氧核糖核苷酸(DAMP、DGMP、DCMP、DTMP)线型连接而成的,没有分枝。连接的方式是在核苷酸之间形成
A.突发上腹部持续性刀割样剧痛,全腹紧张如板B.常于傍晚呕吐大量宿食,无胆汁C.柏油便、面色苍白、身软无力D.进食后10~21min,上腹胀满、呕吐、心悸乏力E.有规律的上腹痛转变为无规律的持续性隐痛胃、十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔的表现是
关于工程质量检测说法,正确的是()。
建立账套。账套号:001账套名称:非凡科技有限公司启用会计期:2010年03月单位名称:非凡科技有限公司单位简称:非凡科技行业性质:小企业会计制度账套主管:王明存货分类:是
用户调查法对未来市场需求变动预测的准确性以()为最低。
下列关于联产品的说法中,错误的是()。
资料同上。2014年有关借款利息资本化金额和费用化金额的计算,不正确的是()。
设在平面区域D上数量场u(x,y)=50一x2一4y2,试问在点P0(1,一2)∈D处沿什么方向时u(x,y)升高最快,并求一条路径,使从点P0(1,一2)处出发沿这条路径u(x,y)升高最快.
最新回复
(
0
)