首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
admin
2013-02-16
44
问题
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical hypothesis is that hypnosis may be the product of "vivid imagination", a now discredited charge stemming from the observation that many people who are hypnotizable can be led to experience compellingly realistic auditory and visual hallucinations. Nothing that an auditory hallucination and the act of imagining a sound are both self-generated and that, like real hearing, a hallucination is experienced as the product of an external source, Henry Szechtman used PET(positron emission tomography)to image the brain activity of hypnotized subjects invited to imagine a scenario and then experiencing a hallucination. By monitoring regional blood flow in areas activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged" as authentic and originating in the outside world.
Szechtman imaged the brain activity of eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to hallucinate under hypnosis. During the session, the subjects were under hypnosis and lay in the PET scanner with their brain activity being monitored under four conditions: at rest;while hearing an audiotape of a voice, while imagining hearing the voice again;and during the auditory hallucination they experienced after being informed that the tape was playing once more, although it was not. The tests suggested that a region of the brain called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the volunteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the stimulus. In contrast, that brain area remained dormant while the subjects were imagining that they heard the stimulus.
The second major objection raised by critics argues that hypnosis’ ability to blunt pain results from either simple relaxation or a placebo response. McGlashan established that while hypnosis was only as effective in reducing pain as a sugar pill for poorly hypnotizable people, highly hypnotizable subjects benefited three times more from hypnosis than from the placebo. In response to these successes, Rainville devised experiments to determine which brain structures are involved in pain relief during hypnosis, attempting to locate the brain structures associated with the suffering component of pain, as distinct from its sensory aspects. Using PET, he and other scientists found that hypnosis reduced the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex—an area known to be involved in pain—but did not affect the activity of the somatosensory cortex, where the sensations of pain are processed.
Despite the value of these findings, the mechanisms underlying hypnotic pain relief are still poorly understood. The model favored by most researchers is that the analgesic effect of hypnosis occurs in higher brain centers than those involved in registering the painful sensation, accounting for the fact that most autonomic responses that routinely accompany pain—such as increased heart rate — are relatively unaffected by hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.
The research described in the passage is primarily concerned with answering which of the following questions?
选项
A、What research guarantees the reality of the effects that hypnosis has on brain activity, and what is their causal mechanism?
B、How are experiments devoted to disproving the "vivid imagination" objection to hypnosis different from those devoted to disproving the "placebo effect" thesis?
C、How can researchers reproduce the useful effects of hypnosis in a medical setting?
D、What technical advances have permitted researchers to reject skeptical explanations of the phenomenon of hypnosis?
答案
C
解析
内容理解题。问的是文章主要回答了哪些问题。根据原文,第二段讲了催眠对大脑活动的作用;第三段讲了催眠止痛的大脑机制问题。所以正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mEmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Atpresent,Chinahassignedmany______tradeagreementswithothercountries.
FoodanddrinkplayamajorroleinChristmascelebrationsinmostcountries,butinfewmoresothaninMexico.Manyfamilies
ThehistoryofAfrican—Americansduringthepast400yearsistraditionallynarrated【41】anongoingstraggleagainst【42】andindif
ThehistoryofAfrican—Americansduringthepast400yearsistraditionallynarrated【41】anongoingstraggleagainst【42】andindif
Thedirectoroftheresearchinstitutecameinpersonto______thateverythingwasallright.
Manyamythhasgrownuparoundthebrain’sasymmetry(不对称现象).71.Theleftcerebralhemisphereissupposedtobethecoldlylogi
ReformingtheSocialSecurityretirementprogramisanissueofenormouspracticalimportance.Yetitremainsthemissingpiece
Doesanunbornbabyknowhismother’svoice?PsychologyprofessorAnthonyDeCasperadvisedaningeniousexperimenttofindout.
Theenergycrisis,whichisbeingfeltaroundtheworld,hasdramatizedhowthecarelessuseoftheearth’sresourceshasbrought
WhatMakesa"MillennialMind"?(1)Since1000AD,around30billionpeoplehavebeenbornonourplanet.Thevastmajorityh
随机试题
根据技术创新对象的不同,技术创新分为()。
水中毒还需用_____以促进水分排出。
在医院中出生的新生儿感染,均属医院感染。()
超声成像过程中,下列哪种脉冲长度对高分辨力而言是最重要的
某种药物与受体结合后,产生某种作用并引起一系列效应,该药属于
该公司过去的竞争优势来自()。公司应围绕()进行改革。
某新浪博客博主发表涉及原告个人隐私的文章,原告先后向新浪公司和百度公司发出律师函要求采取必要措施,新浪公司在诉讼中未提交证据证明其采取了删除等必要措施,百度公司则提供证据证明其采取了断开链接、删除等措施。如果原告起诉两公司,下列选项中错误的是:
常用的价值工程对象选择的方法,包括()。
脑子不用会坏掉,左脑和右脑,用的节奏不对,会加速坏掉。好在生活并不是天然被分成左脑生活和右脑生活,也许日本的研究,更多的是对生活的调侃。但至少可以说明,我们想当然认为没用的东西,八卦消息和电子游戏,亲人之间的闲聊,它们其实有着相当现实的意义——生活中这些边
SearchResultsOctober8-22Montreal:PierreTrudeauInternationalAirport(YUL)Marrakech:ManeraAirport(RAK)FrenchAirlines
最新回复
(
0
)