首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
39
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Microblog,asanewlyemergingsocialnetwork,hassweptoverChina,whichservesasaconvenientmediaforthepublictoexpres
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
Thewordhugisofuncertainorigin.TheOxfordEnglishDictionarycautionsagainstconfusingitwithhugge—avariantoftheMid
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
Chinesee-commercecompanyAlibabaGroupplanstotakeitsHongKong-listedunitprivate,twosourcesfamiliarwiththematters
Thoughsteamengineshavenowpassedthe______oftheirusefulness,theirheritageremains.
EveryoneintheofficeknowsthatMelindatakesinfinitecareoverherwork.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Whenonespouseisdepressed,amarriageisdepressed.Thisillnesserodesemotionalandsexualintimacyandmakesarelationshi
RuthHandlerinventedsomethingin1959whichbecamesoquintessentiallyAmericanastobeincludedintheofficial"America’s
随机试题
A.玫瑰疹B.鸡皮样红色皮疹C.黏膜疹D.荨麻疹E.水疱疹麻疹早期可见
关于对比剂的叙述,错误的是
A.孕甾烷B.雌甾烷C.雄甾烷D.肾甾烷E.胆甾烷甲睾酮的母核
下列关于人权和我国对人权的保护的分析判断哪些说法是错误的?()
设A为n阶可逆方阵,则()不成立。
简述细水雾灭火系统的巡查内容。
2017年1月31日甲公司应付某金融机构一笔贷款1000万元到期(含利息),因甲公司发生财务困难,短期内无法支付。当日,甲公司与金融机构签订债务重组协议,约定减免甲公司债务的15%,其余部分延期两年支付,年利率为6%(相当于实际利率),利息按年支付。金融机
班级管理
关于党对法治事业的领导,下列说法正确的是()。
1,5,21,99,351,()
最新回复
(
0
)