首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
31
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Youshouldn’t______yourfather’sinstructions.Anywayheisanexperiencedteacher.
Somecollegesexpresstheirdisapprovalsofstudentsinvestinginstockmarketbecausetheyconsideritasadistractionforthe
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
Chinesee-commercecompanyAlibabaGroupplanstotakeitsHongKong-listedunitprivate,twosourcesfamiliarwiththematters
Don’tmisstheboat.Thatcompanyisquitefamous.Theunderlinedwordmeans______.
ThecoldandrainyweatherinParishasnotstoppedJoeSchaeffer,anAmericantouristfromMilwaukee,Wisconsin,fromvisiting
ThecoldandrainyweatherinParishasnotstoppedJoeSchaeffer,anAmericantouristfromMilwaukee,Wisconsin,fromvisiting
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,buthistoryshowstheycanalsobehighlyeffective.
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,buthistoryshowstheycanalsobehighlyeffective.
随机试题
没有考虑到工作的结构性、领导权力大小等的影响,不能解释为什么具有不同特质的领导在各自的组织中均可以工作得非常出色,表明特质理论()的缺陷。
按分经治疗规律,手太阳经治疗
关于执行异议和复议,下列说法中正确的是:()
(2007年)一个完整的计算机系统应该指的是()。
根据合伙企业法律制度的规定,合伙协议未约定合伙企业利润分配和亏损分担比例的。合伙人之间分配利润和分担亏损的原则是()。
Mostpeoplewhotravellongdistancecomplainofjetlag.Jetlagmakesbusinesstravelerslessproductiveandmoreprone【C1】____
在梁启超的教育思想中,群学之基是
私放俘虏罪
设f(x)为R上不恒等于零的奇函数,且fˊ(0)存在,则函数
Recoveryfromjetlagcantakeaslongasadayforeverytimezonecrossed.Soifyou’reflyingeast-westforyourholidayoron
最新回复
(
0
)