首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
So you want to fight your own ease in court? Then take heart: Litigants in Person, as the official term has it, are not to be lo
So you want to fight your own ease in court? Then take heart: Litigants in Person, as the official term has it, are not to be lo
admin
2014-12-11
24
问题
So you want to fight your own ease in court? Then take heart: Litigants in Person, as the official term has it, are not to be looked down upon any more. This is hot to say that all civil disputes are suitable for personal treatment. Those involving abstruse points of law are usually best left to lawyers and in some cases baffle even legal minds.
The obviously suitable case is that of the aggrieved consumer who is involved in a claim arising out of the sale or hire purchases of goods, or the provision of services. But straightforward debt cases, some landlord and tenant matters, road traffic cases involving damage to vehicles only, claims for willful damage to property or for minor assaults and claims for wages and salaries owing in lieu of notice may all present feasible scope for the layman. Whether a case lies within the confines of simplicity is not always clear but no solicitor should mind being consulted on the question of whether given circumstances might admit of personal action. County court work is notoriously unremunerative and he is unlikely to feel aggrieved or think that you want to do him out of business.
Saving a bill from your own solicitor is, of course, the first but not the only financial aspect to consider before taking solo action. The general rule in county court litigation is that the loser pays the legal costs of the winner, or at least so much of those costs as are approved by the court. The latter are rarely as much as the total bill presented by the solicitor to his client but will be large none the less.
It is almost always impossible to guess how much the costs will be in a contested ease—the total depends on so many variable factors. But it is probably no exaggeration to say that even when suing in person for £ 200 you could put almost the same sum at risk in respect of the other side’ s legal costs and your own expenses. In smaller claims, however, a special rule applies. Where the sum in dispute does not exceed £ 100 the legal costs recoverable by the winner are normally limited to those of starting proceedings ; no costs are usually recoverable for representation at the trial or arbitration of the matter. The loser will thus rarely pay more than a few pounds for the winner’s expenses. It is, therefore, sensible when considering self-help in the county court to keep that figure of £ 100 well in mind: below it the risks as to costs are-much-reduced.
Litigants in Person who win have had until now a frequent grievance. Their bills for costs payable by the other side have not been allowed to include any recompense for the time and energy expended in the preparation of their case. The recent Litigants in Person(Costs)Act have, however, ensured that these situations will he rectified; new rules are to be brought into force.
A further financial consideration is whether it is worth bringing even a cast iron case against someone who may be without die means to meet the judgment. Admittedly it is often difficult to know the extent of a defendant’s resources, but if he is patently a man of straw there is little point in adding irrecoverable expenses to the sum of you original grievance.
Finally, a personal judgment. While your case may not require the stamina necessary to struggle on to the end of a long protracted battle, time, patience and perseverance are required of all litigants, and of the inexperienced in double measure. Read How to sue in the County Court, published by the Consumers’ Association, and get hold of the official guide from your local court. If you are not put off altogether, you will need them.
In county-court litigation, approved costs are normally______.
选项
A、greater than the fee the solicitor requires
B、smaller than the fee the solicitor requires
C、less than the solicitor anticipates
D、more than the client anticipates
答案
B
解析
该题属于细节推理题,题干定位词litigation approved costs为cost proved by the courted的同义置换,故可将该题定位到原文第三段第二句,根据第二、三句内容可知选项[B]符合文义,为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mlK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Untilthetwentiethcentury(1900s),themajorityoftheblackpopulationlivedinthesouthernpartoftheUnitedStates.Then
Untilthetwentiethcentury(1900s),themajorityoftheblackpopulationlivedinthesouthernpartoftheUnitedStates.Then
Duringthepasttenorfifteenyearsagreatdealofattentionhasbeen【C1】______to"tellingitlikeitis,"or"lettingitall
Aperson’shomeisasmuchareflectionofhispersonalityastheclotheshewears.Thefoodheeatsandthefriendswithwhomh
Aperson’shomeisasmuchareflectionofhispersonalityastheclotheshewears.Thefoodheeatsandthefriendswithwhomh
Researchonanimalintelligencealwaysmakesmewonderjusthowsmarthumansare.【C1】______thefruit-flyexperimentsdescribedi
TheSouthPoleTravelsofStabilityItisnotquiteBenidormyet,butAntarcticahasbecomeanincreasinglypopulardestinat
Accordingtotheauthor,anidealmarriagelife______.InParagraph2,theword"legitimate"mostprobablymeans______.
Concreteisprobablyusedmorewidelythananyothersubstanceexceptwater,yetitremainslargelyunappreciated.“Somepeople
Theterm"betray"(Paragraph2)mostprobablymeansItcanbeinferredfromthelastparagraphthat
随机试题
MRP系统中主生产计划是由市场预测和()所决定。
在现代中国56个民族中,除汉族外,有自己语言文字的民族有()
良性前列腺增生的典型症状是()。
甲企业与其关联方签署了成本分摊协议,共同开发无形资产,并约定退出补偿时协议成果转让给关联方,该成本分摊协议符合独立交易原则,下列关于甲企业成本分摊的税务处理中,正确的有()。(2016年)
原则上,物权人可以自由抛弃其物权。但抛弃物权妨害他人利益的,不得抛弃。下列物权中,不得抛弃的有()。
2,3,20,92,448,()
下列关于党的建设理论的说法,正确的是()。
关于刑事管辖权,下列哪一选项是不正确的?()
Atschoolwewentoveroursocialnetworkingguidelines.【C1】______theobvious—don’tbeinappropriatewithstudentsthroughtexti
MassProduction:MethodandImpactP1:EvenwiththeearlysuccessesinEurope,scholarsoftechnologyattributethewidespread
最新回复
(
0
)