首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the US Economy A) In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an amb
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the US Economy A) In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an amb
admin
2021-12-15
14
问题
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the US Economy
A) In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an ambitious goal of 4 percent real growth in gross domestic product (GDP). This goal has been greeted with substantial skepticism from parts of the economics establishment, while some economists have praised it as a " worthy and viable aspiration" that could be achieved with growth-oriented policies. Our recent research implies that a 4 percent growth goal for the first term of the next President is not only possible, but is what we should strive to achieve. Like Hubbard and Warsh, veteran Republican economic policymakers, we agree that the US needs policies that raise labor force participation, accelerate productivity growth and improve expectations. Where we part ways is the tactics.
B) Their recommendations focus on supply-side policies, such as tax reform, regulatory reform, reduced trade friction and education and training. Our research implies that a weak demand side explains the sluggish (萧条的) recovery from the Great Recession, with the rise of income inequality as a central factor. Consequently, our policy prescriptions revolve around increasing die take-home pay of the majority of American households. The Great Recession, which began in December 2007, was the most severe American economic downturn in three-quarters of a century. Most economists did not anticipate ahead of time that this kind of thing could happen, although we warned that " it could get ugly out there" in October 2007.
C) But as the severity of the recession became apparent in the dark days of late 2008 and early 2009, many economists predicted a swift bounce-back, reasoning from historical evidence that deep downturns are followed by rapid recoveries. Sadly, that prediction was also incorrect. The growth path following the Great Recession has been historically sluggish. Our recent research, supported by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, helps explain why: The economic drag from decades of rising income inequality has held back consumer spending.
D) Our work studies the link between rising income inequality and US household demand over the past several decades. From the middle 1980s until the middle 2000s, American consumers spent liberally despite the fact that income growth stagnated (停滞) for most of the population. We show that the annual growth rate of household income slowed markedly in 1980 for the bottom 95 percent of the income distribution, while income growth for the top 5 percent accelerated at the same time. The result was the widely discussed rise of income inequality.
E) It is also well known that household debt grew rapidly during this period. Our work points out that the buildup of debt relative to income was concentrated in the bottom 95 percent of the income distribution. Debt to income for the top 5 percent bounced around with little clear trend; When the financial crisis hit, our work shows that the bottom 95 percent of Americans could no longer get the rising debt they needed to continue to spend along the trend they established in the years leading up to the crisis. The result was a sharp cutback in household demand relative to income that caused the collapse of the Great Recession.
F) What about the recovery? Household demand in 2013 (the most recent observation we have because our computations incorporate data that are released with a lag and are available at an annual frequency only) was a stunning 17. 5 percent below its pre-recession trend, with no sign of recovering back toward the trend. What happened? Our research implies mat the cutoff of credit for the group of households falling behind as income inequality rose prevented their spending from recovering to its pre-recession path.
G) While there is no reason to necessarily expect that consumer spending will follow a constant trend over long periods of time, the practical reality is that the US economy needed the pre-recession trend of demand to maintain adequate growth and at least a rough approximation of full employment prior to 2007. In the middle 2000s, there was no sign of excess demand in the US economy. Inflation was tame and interest rates were low. Wage growth was stagnant. Although some gradual slowing in long-term US growth might have been predicted as the large baby-boom generation ages, the overall labor force participation rate was actually rising prior to the recession, so there was no reason to expect any significant decline in labor resources in the years immediately following 2007.
H) Yes, the way many Americans were financing their demand was unsustainable, but there is no indication that businesses could not sustainably continue to produce along the pre-recession trend if they had been able to sell the output. Our interpretation of the evidence is that the demand drag that could be expected as the result of rising inequality is, after a delay of a-quarter century, finally constraining the US economy. Intuition, theory and evidence predict that high-income people spend, on average, a smaller share of their income than everyone else does. So as a higher share of income goes into the pockets of the well-to-do, the household sector as a whole is likely to recycle less of its income back into spending, which slows the path of demand growth.
I) A possible problem with this prediction for the US in recent years is that income inequality began to rise in the early 1980s, but household demand remained strong through 2006. Our argument is that the demand drag from rising inequality was postponed by the buildup of debt; The bottom 95 percent borrowed rather than cut back their spending when their income growth slowed. But as the crisis hit, leading to households collapsed, and the trend of rising debt could not continue.
J) The effect of rising inequality has hit the economy hard. As a result, today’s economy is underperforming. No one can know precisely how much of the stagnation in household demand is due to the rise of inequality, but our estimates imply that the current path of total demand in the economy is at least 10 percent below where it would have been with the income distribution of the early 1980s. Where demand goes, so follows output and employment. This analysis links to the call for 4 percent growth. Considering conventional estimates of the long-term trend growth of the economy, a 4 percent growth rate through the next US President’s first term would go a long way toward closing the gap in output that opened with the collapse of household spending in the Great Recession and has yet to be filled.
K) How can we move toward this goal? Our research strongly implies that the main problem is on the demand side, not the supply side. The US needs to find a way to boost demand growth by arresting, and hopefully reversing, the dramatic rise of inequality. The basic argument is exceedingly simple; The economy continues to be held back by insufficient household spending, and if the income share of Americans outside of the top sliver rises, household spending will increase. Policies that raise the minimum wage and reduce the tax burden of low- and middle-income households would help.
L) In our view, however, the best method to achieve this objective would be to restore wage growth across the income distribution as occurred in the decades after World War II. Meeting this objective is challenging for a variety of reasons, including the fact that there remains no clear consensus about what has caused the rise of American economic inequality. But the need to address inequality is not just a matter of social justice; it also is important to get the economy back on the right track after more than seven years of stagnation. We can do better.
Reducing the income inequality is of significance in terms of social justice and economic recovery.
选项
答案
L
解析
由题干中的inequality、social justice和economic recovery定位到原文L)段倒数第二句。细节归纳题。L)段倒数第二句提到,解决收入不平等问题不仅关系到社会公平,还关系到经济在长达七年以上萎靡不振的情况下是否可以回到正轨。题干中的significance对应原文中的important;economic recovery对应原文中的get the economy back on the right track。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pCx7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Shedesignedlotsofappropriateswimwearforwomen.B、Sheoncesuccessfullycompetedagainstmeninswimming.C、Shewasthef
A、Thereallyneedystudentscan’tgetitandhavetodropout.B、Negotiationsleaveschoolslittleroomforimprovement.C、Stude
A、Thebankisprovidingmorefavorabletaxes.B、Thebankiscollectingmorefeesthanheexpected.C、Hereceivesabankstatemen
A、Wasteproductswhichcanbepreventedordisposedofsensibly.B、Artificialandnaturalsubstancesreleasedintotheenvironme
A、Companieswerefightingforthegamingmarket.B、Theysawhigheconomicreturnsinthebusiness.C、Moreandmorepeoplewereu
A、Changetheirjobs.B、Earnmoremoney.C、Reducetheirworkinghours.D、Strengthenthegovernment’srole.C
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledShouldSchoolSportsFacilitiesBeOpentothePublic?
随着计划生育政策(thefamilyplanningpolicy)的推行和家庭观念的改变,中国传统的家庭规模和结构发生了明显变化。一是独生子女家庭增多,家庭平均人口逐渐下降。二是家庭结构呈现出小型化(miniaturization)趋势,传统的大家庭
A、Afitnessprogramofferedtothegeneralpublic.B、Aphysicalexercisetobuildupmuscles.C、Aprogramthatmakespeoplekeep
A、Hehasagoodmemory.B、Hebelieveseverybodyshouldberespected.C、Hisbossrequireshimtodoso.D、Hegetsanamelistof
随机试题
A.单纯肋骨骨折B.多发性肋骨骨折胸壁软化C.胸壁挫伤D.闭合性气胸E.张力性气胸紫绀
A.GnRHB.雄激素C.孕激素D.抑制素E.LH
男性,35岁。因鼻塞、流涕3天伴咽痛、咳嗽两天就诊。自服“感冒通”等稍好转。无明显发热、咳痰及胸痛等。查体:T37.3℃,神志清,呼吸平顺,唇甲无发绀,咽稍红,双侧扁桃体无肿大。气管居中,双肺叩诊清音,未闻明显干湿啰音。患者行血常规示:WBC2.8
缺牙间隙多,倒凹大时适合采用平均倒凹法确定就位道。()
从国际上来看,委托指令有效期一般有当日有效与约定日有效两种。()
债券市场的功能主要体现在()。
《六朝那些事儿》一一寻绎魏晋六朝时代人物与事件的原委,但作者显然不是______,而是凭借对中国历史的熟谙,上下古今,议论风生,如指诸掌,加上采用的是比较新潮的语言,诙谐、生动,______,读来真不觉令人忘倦。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
比如你自己,过去未尝不知道莫扎特的特色,但你对他并没有发生真正的共鸣;感之不深,自然爱之不切了;爱之不切,弹出来当然也不够味儿;而越是不够味儿,越是引不起你的兴趣。如此下去,你对一个音乐家的了解当然无从深入。以下哪项,从上述题干中推出最为恰当?
婴儿动作发展的规律以下表述不正确的是()【江西师范大学2014】
设A为3阶矩阵,α1,α2,α3是线性的无关3维列向量组,满足Aα1=α1+2α2+2α3,Aα2=2α1+α2+2α3,Aα3=2α1+2α2+α3.(1)求A的特征值.(2)判断A是否相似于对角矩阵?
最新回复
(
0
)