首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
admin
2022-02-18
77
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used and, in many cases, the only source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teacher’s performance, the rating must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what were learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the student’s level, professional behavior in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject.
The word "approach" in paragraph 2 means________.
选项
A、be more than
B、come near
C、equal
D、better than
答案
B
解析
词汇题。本题考查学生在阅读过程中根据上下文对于生僻词的猜测和理解。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rUQD777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
规范最适模型的特点是具有很强的()
林德布洛姆的渐进主义模型是在批评________的过程中建构的。()
简述问题解决的特征。
Ineedonemorestampbeforemycollection________.
ShewassurprisedtofindalltheseCDsandshepickedoneupandsatdownonthebedandshestartedtoopenone.
NoauthorinAmericanliteratureisbetterknownormorelovedthanSamuelLanghorneClemens.BorninMissouriin1835,hegrew
A.Soonafterhetransferredtothenewschool,Johnfoundthathehadgreatdifficultykeepingupwiththerestofhisclass.B
Grown-upsareoftensurprisedbyhowwelltheyremembersomethingtheylearnedaschildrenbuthaveneverpracticedeversince.
Amoment’sdrillingbythedentistmaymakeusnervousandupset.Manyofuscannotstandpain.Toavoidthepainofadrilling
A.hitB.slightlyC.indicatesD.impliesE.allowedF.generallyGprimarilyH.stopI.diagnosedJ.forecast
随机试题
SQ3R阅读法中可以做笔记的步骤是
配对设计资料采用秩和检验,若n=9,t=41,查表得t0.01(9)=1~44,t0.05(9)=5~40,t0.1(9)=8~37,则其尸值为
某综合大楼位于市区,裙楼为5层,1号、2号双塔楼为42层,建筑面积116000m2,建筑高度208m。双塔楼主要结构为混凝土核心筒加钢结构框架,其中钢结构框架的钢管柱共计36根,规格为φ1600×35、φ1600×30、φ1600×25三种,材
背景材料:A公司中标排水管道工程,管线全长为6.8km,管径为DN800mm,管材为聚乙烯双壁波纹管,沟槽开挖深度为4.0~5.0m,沟槽底宽为1.2m,边坡为1:0.33。现场土质为粉质黏土,除个别地段有浅层滞水外,其他地段施工不需要降水。项目
结合实际,谈谈学习教育法的意义。
[*]
设随机变量X服从参数为λ的泊松分布,且P(X=0)=P(X=1)/2,则P(X≥1)=________.
计算机的主频指的是()。
•ReadthearticlebelowaboutsicknessatworkinBritain.•ChoosethecorrectwordtofilleachgapfromA,B,CorDonthe
Theyear1400openedwithmorepeacefulnessthanusualinEngland.Onlyafewmonthsbefore,RichardII,weak,wicked,andtreac
最新回复
(
0
)