首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
51
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
ReadingontheInternet:TheLinkbetweenLiteracyandTechnologyWithaccesstotheInternetathomeandinclassrooms,Ali
Thestudyofhowwedothingswithwordsisthestudyof______.
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
随机试题
对肾盂肾炎患者的健康教育不正确的是
电力设施保护区内关于取土范围的规定,下列说法正确的是()。
在技术方案经济效果评价中,资金时间价值的换算方法与()的计算方法完全相同。
企业债券发行人向交易所申请上市,必须由交易所认可的1~2个机构推荐,并出具上市推荐书。上市推荐人应当符合下列哪些条件()
甲公司有锅炉和供电两个辅助生产车间,分别为基本生产车间和行政管理部门提供蒸汽和电力,两个辅助生产车间之间也相互提供产品。2015年9月份的辅助生产及耗用情况如下:要求:分别采用直接分配法和交互分配法对辅助生产费用进行分配(结果填入下方表格中。不用列
在一项研究中,51名中学生志愿者被分成测试组和对照组,进行同样的数学能力培训。在为期5天的培训中,研究人员使用一种称为经颅随机噪声刺激的技术对25名测试组成员脑部被认为与运算能力有关的区域进行轻微的电击。此后的测试结果表明,测试组成员的数学运算能力明显高于
Thefitnessmovementthatbeganinthelate1960sandearly1970scenteredaroundaerobicexercise(有氧操).Millionsofindividual
Harvardthrilledmiddle-classparentslastweekbycappingitstuitionforfamilieswithincomesofupto$180,000at10percent
有如下程序:PriateSubForm_Click()DimiAsInteger,nAsIntegerFori=lTo20i=i+4:n=n+i
Accordingtothespeaker,whatshouldonepayspecialattentiontoifhewantstosaveup?
最新回复
(
0
)