The sale of the Washington Post to Jeff Bezos is just the most recent episode in the decline and fall of professional journalism

admin2022-07-26  17

问题     The sale of the Washington Post to Jeff Bezos is just the most recent episode in the decline and fall of professional journalism. By selling out to a mega-billionaire without any newspaper experience, the Graham family has put a priceless national asset at the mercy of a single outsider. Perhaps Jeff Bezos will use his new plaything responsibly; perhaps not; if not, one of the few remaining sources of serious journalism will be lost.
    The crisis in the English-speaking world will turn into a catastrophe in smaller language zones. The English-speaking market is so large that advertisers will pay a lot to gain access to the tens of millions of readers who regularly click onto the New York Times or the Guardian. But the Portuguese-reading public is far too small to support serious journalism on the internet. What happens to Portuguese democracy when nobody is willing to pay for old-fashioned newspapers?
    The blogosphere can’t be expected to take up the slack. First-class reporting on national and international affairs isn’t for amateurs. It requires lots of training and lots of contacts and lots of expenses. It also requires reporters with the well-honed capacity to write for a broad audience. The modern newspaper created the right incentives, but without a comparable business model for the new technology, blogging will degenerate into a postmodern nightmare—with millions spouting off without any concern for the facts.
    We can’t afford to wait for the invisible hand to come up with a new way to provide economic support for serious journalism. To be sure, the financial press has proved moderately successful in persuading readers to pay for online access; and mainstream media are now trying to emulate this success. But if tens of millions of readers don’t surrender to the charms of PayPal—and quickly—now is the time for some creative thinking. For starters, it would be a mistake to rely on a BBC-style solution. After all it is one thing for government to serve as a major source of news; quite another to give it a virtual monopoly on reporting.
    Enter the Internet news voucher. Under our proposal, each news article on the web will end by asking readers whether it contributed to their political understanding. If so, they can click the yes-box, and send the message to a National Endowment for Journalism—which would obtain an annual appropriation from the government. This money would be distributed to news organizations on the basis of a strict mathematical formula: the more clicks, the bigger the check from the Endowment. This way, serious journalism will succeed in gaining mass support. Common sense, as well as fundamental liberal values, counsels against any governmental effort to regulate the quality of news.
What do we know about the Internet news voucher?

选项 A、It may help the public enhance political understanding.
B、It will be funded and thus controlled by the government.
C、It may be a good way to revive serious journalism.
D、It will spread liberal values and save serious journalism.

答案C

解析 主要根据第五段倒数第二句“这样一来,严肃新闻将成功获得大众支持”,以及最后一句,可以知道:这种评判体系也许可以振兴严肃新闻,所以C项正确。文章中只说到在此方案中,新闻报道结尾处会问读者是否在政见理解上得到收益,并没有给出肯定意见,不选A。B项半对半错,是由政府出资,但没有提及是否受政府控制,而且根据该段最后一句可以看出似乎不受政府控制的可能性更大。D项强干扰,文中确实提到自由价值,但是是不是这种评判体系能够传播自由价值,文中并未提及或暗示,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vQmZ777K
0

最新回复(0)