首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A]No miracle diets for heart disease or cancer [B]How the study was conducted? [C]The outcome of the study on heart disease [D]
[A]No miracle diets for heart disease or cancer [B]How the study was conducted? [C]The outcome of the study on heart disease [D]
admin
2019-08-01
20
问题
[A]No miracle diets for heart disease or cancer
[B]How the study was conducted?
[C]The outcome of the study on heart disease
[D]Low colorectal cancer rate: chance or the low-fat diet?
[E]The significance of the study on breast cancer
[F]How fat and heart disease are related?
Starting a low-fat diet in mid-life does not, by itself, decrease a woman’s risk of heart disease or stroke or dramatically reduce her risk of breast cancer or colorectal cancer, according to three studies published today of almost 50, 000 healthy, post-menopausal women. But the findings still support the general idea that you need to pay attention to how much fat—and particularly what kinds of fat—you eat.
【R1】______
Researchers randomly divided the participants into two groups, worked hard to get one group to cut its fat intake and then compared the results for each of them for the next several years. Through focus groups and sessions with nutritionists, the so-called intervention group was given a lot of help and information on how to cut the amount of fat in their diet. As a group they weren’t able to get all the way down to 20% fat intake, but they did manage to reduce it to 24% in the first year, though it slid back up to 29% by the sixth year. The other, so-called control group received printed material on dietary guidelines but no other help on healthy eating. The fat content of their diets was 35% after one year and crept up to 37% after six years—and they gained a little weight to boot.(The intervention group lost weight or stayed the same.)
【R2】______
All told, the women in the two groups showed no overall difference in the number of heart attacks or strokes they suffered over the eight years of the study. Part of the reason may be that the level of LDL or" bad" cholesterol dropped in the intervention group by a tiny 2. 4%—too small a reduction for the study to be able to detect a difference in outcome.
【R3】______
It’s also possible that if you want to prevent heart disease, it’s not enough to focus just on the total amount of fat in the diet; you also have to look at the types of fat as well as exercise and physical activity levels. Why didn’t the study focus more intently on these variables? Researchers were not as aware of how important they were back in the late 1980s, when they were designing the trial.
【R4】______
Women in the low-fat group suffered 9 % fewer breast cancers than those in the control group. Although that difference was not statistically significant, it is very suggestive. Given how long it takes for most tumors to grow, it may simply be that the study has not lasted long enough to show a significant effect. In addition, there was a clear benefit for one sub-group of women—those who began the study with the highest total fat consumption and who were able to make and maintain the greatest reduction in the number of fat calories in their diet. This group benefited from al5% to 20% drop in the incidence of breast cancer.
【R5】______
Women in the low-fat group did not see a significant drop in their rates of colorectal cancer. Given how long it takes colorectal cancer to develop, a 9% difference is significant. Welcome to the wild and complex world of statistics. After looking at the variation in the data with various mathematical tools, research statisticians determined that they couldn’t rule out the possibility that the 9% difference in breast cancer results was due to chance alone. On the other hand, after applying those same mathematical tools to the data in the colorectal cancer study, they determined that the 9% difference in the number of polyps was unlikely to be due to chance alone.
So, in many ways these studies raised more questions than they answered. Strictly speaking, the results do not apply to men, who tend to get heart disease earlier than women do and for whom a low-fat diet might be particularly beneficial. But this study has set the gold standard for diet studies in the future.
【R2】
选项
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vh2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
What’stheenginethatdrivesAmericanbusiness?Innovation?Sweat?Capital?Trycoffee.Fromtheshopfloortotheboardroom,J
Writeanessaybasedonthefollowingpicture.Inyourwriting,youshould1)describethepicturebriefly,2)interpret
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproperty【C1】______c
ThisweektheNewCommissionontheSkillsoftheAmericanWorkforcereleasesablueprintforrethinkingAmericaneducationtob
Thehumannoseisanunderratedtool.Humansareoftenthoughttobeinsensitivesmellerscomparedwithanimals,【B1】______this
Thehumannoseisanunderratedtool.Humansareoftenthoughttobeinsensitivesmellerscomparedwithanimals,【B1】______this
ManyforeignerswhohavenotvisitedBritaincallalltheinhabitantsEnglish,fortheyareusedtothinkingoftheBritishIsle
Itwasyourmother-in-lawwhomImetintheparkthedaybeforeyesterday.
—Idon’tunderstandhowyougotaticket.Ialwaysthoughtyouwereacarefuldriver.—______,butIthoughtIcouldgetthrough
Theyhardlyspeaktoeachothernowadays,______they?
随机试题
亚里士多德认为构成政体的要素有
下列β受体阻断药中哪个兼有α受体阻断作用
欲用大黄泻下通便,宜用
A.必须按照规定印有或贴有标签并附有说明书B.分为大包装和中包装C.必须印有商标D.指直接与药品接触的包装E.必须注明不良反应
某潜水水源地分布面积A为15km2,该地年降水量P为456mm,降水入渗系数α为0.3,请问该水源地的年降水渗入补给量为()。
反映公司偿债能力的财务比率指标是()。
年审以考评为主,下列关于导游员考评扣分的说法正确的是()。
教师在对教具和实验进行演示的同时,最重要的是必须()。
一般来说,戏剧的力量在于文学的力量,而文学的力量在于思想的力量,思想的力量其实应该带有批判性,而批判性要掌握一个_______和尺度,没有这个那就变成全是_______的,这恐怕也缺乏社会责任。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
America’sFederalReservecutinterestratesbyanotherquarter-point,to3.75%.WallStreet,whichhadbeen【21】forasixthhal
最新回复
(
0
)