首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
To the one British couple in seven that has problems conceiving, twins sound like a dream come true. So when would-be parents tu
To the one British couple in seven that has problems conceiving, twins sound like a dream come true. So when would-be parents tu
admin
2017-03-15
31
问题
To the one British couple in seven that has problems conceiving, twins sound like a dream come true. So when would-be parents turn to in vitro fertilisation (IVF), they almost always opt to have as many embryos returned to the womb as they are legally allowed, even though they know that multiple births are especially risky. The result is that two-fifths of IVF babies are twins. And fertility treatment is now so common that it is distorting the nation’s demographics: around a quarter of all twins have been conceived in a petri dish.
Sharing a womb is not an ideal start to life. Twins who survive their much higher rates of miscarriage are often born early and small, which puts them at higher risk of cerebral palsy, low IQ and even death during their first year. Their expectant mothers are more prone to high blood pressure, diabetes and heart problems. Around half of all twins are transferred to intensive-care units soon after birth.
Now the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which licenses fertility clinics in England and Wales, has decided enough is enough. On April 4th it started a three-month consultation on changes in the way fertility treatment is carried out. The new rules, due to come into force in October, aim to halve the number of twin IVF pregnancies.p for discussion are various possible ways to do this. They include educating fertility doctors and their patients about the dangers of multiple births; imposing a limit—probably 10%—on the proportion of births which twins may account for at a clinic; and enforcing rules that set out exactly when clinics are allowed to return two embryos to the womb. The idea is to ensure that only one embryo is put back in women most likely to conceive, whereas two are allowed to those less likely.
Some countries, notably Nordic ones, have already managed to cut the number of twin births resulting from fertility treatment. Provided a woman is reasonably young and healthy, and has not already had many failed IVF attempts, in each IVF cycle only the embryo that develops best is returned to her womb. Any spares are frozen, to be thawed later if the first embryo does not survive. These carefully-selected women are almost as likely to get pregnant this way as if two fresh embryos had been put back in the first place, and the risk of multiple pregnancy is almost eliminated. Persuading patients and clinicians of the merits of this approach depends on generous state funding for fertility treatment: it seems that patients are willing to accept a slightly lower chance of conceiving in any one cycle in return for more attempts. Moral pressure is also brought to bear. In Finland fertility doctors are taken on tours of neonatal wards, so they get to see the tiny, suffering scraps of humanity bora too early because they were crowded in their mothers’ wombs.
In Britain, though—unlike Finland and every other country that has successfully reduced IVF twin births— most infertile people must pay for their own treatment. Government guidelines, issued in 2004, say that all patients for whom IVF is "suitable" should have three treatment cycles paid for by the National Health Service (NHS), but rarely does this happen. Those patients who get public money are usually offered only one IVF cycle, and in some areas there is no public funding of IVF at all.
This means that binding rules are likely to be needed to cut the number of IVF twins in Britain. Otherwise, with a single IVF cycle costing around £5,000, patients will be unwilling to accept even a tiny reduction in their chance of pregnancy, and so will ignore the risks in favour of returning as many embryos as they can. It took strong words from the HFEA in 2001 to start to bring down the numbers of triplets conceived by IVF, followed by the threat and then the reality of stricter rules. Now that women under 40 can have at most two embryos put back, the rate has halved since its peak in 1998.
Some experts consulted by the HFEA held that new rules which might reduce the chance of conceiving should be introduced only if more fertility treatment were paid for by the NHS—something that the HFEA does not have power to arrange. Others said that the risk inherent in multiple births was too urgent to wait for the NHS to change its spending priorities.
The irony is that delivering and caring for twins costs 16 times as much as for a singleton. The HFEA’s advisors calculate that the money now spent on looking after desperately-ill premature IVF babies would be enough to pay for three treatment cycles for everyone who needs them. In the meantime, patients must weigh the risks of multiple pregnancy against the prospect of remaining childless.
Even those most familiar with the sufferings of the infertile seem unsympathetic towards them. Only pregnancy is a more common reason than infertility for a woman to visit her doctor; yet a recent poll found that almost all family doctors thought patients who needed fertility treatment should pay for it themselves (not so those with varicose veins, for example). It is perhaps symptomatic of the low value placed on children and family life in general; another poll, last year, found that most Britons thought work, money and fun were all more important than having children.
Which of the following is NOT a reason why the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has decided "enough is enough"?
选项
A、Because giving birth to twins is dangerous to mothers.
B、Because giving birth to twins is dangerous to babies.
C、Britons now have too many twins and it is difficult to control birth rate.
D、Most parents turn to IVF and choose twins to guarantee success and that leads to disproportional population.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
Theprotesters’________waswhippedupbyrecentreportsinthenewspapersaboutthescandalinmeatindustry.
女士们,先生们,上午好!中国和马来西亚是友好近邻,两国传统友谊源远流长。中国明朝郑和七下西洋,五次到达马六甲,同当地人民友好交往和互利通商,至今传为佳话。中马建交33年来,两国经贸合作持续快速发展。中国海关统计,2006年两国贸易额达371亿
从目前全球经济发展看,一些重要的特点和趋势值得我们高度重视。主要是:科技进步日新月异,前所未有地提高了人们认识和把握宏观世界和微观世界的能力,为人类推动生产力发展和创造美好生活提供了强大支持;国际生产要素优化重组和产业转移加快,各国经济发展更加紧密地联系在
A、Newlyweds.B、Middle-agedcouples.C、Middle-agedandoldercouples.D、Seniorcouples.C根据原文开首的说法,日本离婚率居高反映了“anincreasingnumbe
A、Thelargefueltankswerebroken.B、Itwasanobviousterroristattack.C、Nobodywasinjuredorkilled.D、Theattackerstried
A、ThecoldestpartofAntarctica.B、ThemostfragilepartofAntarctica.C、TheclosestpartofAntarcticatoAustralia.D、Thepa
A、TwoB、TenC、TwentyD、ThirtyB
A、Hehasworkedforthreecompanies.B、Threecompaniesturnedhimdown.C、Hedecidednottoacceptseveraljoboffers.D、Hiscom
WhenDanaHaleadoptedhersonfouryearsago,shesaysshehadto"playhardball"withherbosstogetthesamepaidleavegran
随机试题
下列各项中,不属于负债特征的是
引起麻疹的病毒是
作用时间最长、最容易发生低血糖的降糖药是
患者,女性,36岁,因咽痛服磺胺药后,舌背起疱,破溃后疼痛难忍,进食受限。以往曾有类似病史。检查:舌背黏膜表面可见0.8cm×1.2cm界限清楚的糜烂面,表面有黄色假膜,渗出较多。在询问病史时,应特别注意患者的
某种子站与某县农科所签订一份合同,双方约定,若农科所大豆良种培育成功,则以每公斤150元的价格卖给种子站6公斤。则关于该合同,下列说法错误的是:()
我国建立注册咨询工程师(投资)职业资格制度的必要性包括()。
湖笔、徽墨、宣纸、端砚分别产于()。
义务教育是国家必须予以保障的公益性事业。()
TravelingtoMarsisusuallya【C1】________business—withasinglespacecrafttakingofffromasinglelaunchpadfortheseven-mon
MuchofCanada’sforestryproductiongoestowardsmakingpulpandpaper.AccordingtotheCanadianPulpandPaperAssociation,
最新回复
(
0
)