首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2023-03-07
64
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "municipal" underlined in Paragraph 1 means _____.
选项
A、governmental
B、organizational
C、cosmopolitan
D、institutional
答案
C
解析
municipal意为“城市的”,故C“大都会的,都市的”与之最为接近。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yXcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
"Juststicktoscience."ThisisacommonadmonitionthatSciencereceiveswhenwepublishcommentariesandnewsstoriesonpoli
Inthepast20yearsalone,threecoronaviruseshavecausedmajordiseaseoutbreaks.FirstcametheoriginalSARSvirusin2002.
AdecadeagobiologistsidentifiedaremoteprotectedareainnorthernLaos,calledNamEt-PhouLouey,asthecountry’sprobable
ForMitchellandSkyeCohen,thethird-generationownersofEconomyCandyinNewYorkCity,theshortperiodbetweenHalloweena
Inflationisn’tnew,butpricerisescanstillshock.IrecentlyholidayedintheHamptons,atonybeachareaoutsideNewYork,
Despitehelpingtorecordevents,photoscoulddamageourmemories.Researchersfoundpeoplewhotakepictureshave【C1】________r
Thenewsaboutvitaminskeepsgettingworse.Manystudiespublishedinthelastfewyearsshowsthatavarietyofpopularsupple
Childrenneedexercise.Parentsoftenworrythat【C1】________timeforathleticsorevenforjustplayingontheJungleJimisgoi
Somanypeoplesaytheystrugglewithnames,evenwhenthey’relookingdirectlyatthepersonwhosenamethey’retryingtorecal
Competitionandcooperationaregoingalongtogetherinmodernsociety.Therehasbeenanongoingargumentaboutwhichismoree
随机试题
以反应迅速、有朝气、活泼好动、动作敏捷、情绪不稳定、粗枝大叶为特征的气质类型是( )。
一般排泄性尿路造影检查不能显示的是
脉往来流利,应指流畅,如盘走珠是( )。
25岁初孕妇,停经18周,不觉胎动。产科检查:宫底高度在脐耻之间,胎方位及胎心不清。监测宫内胎儿情况首选的方法是
《处方药与非处方药分类管理办法(试行)》于1999年6月11日经国家药品督管理局局务会审议通过,自2000年1月1日起施行。非处方药是指由国务院药品监督管理部门公布的,不需要凭执业医师和执业助理医师处方,消费者可以自行判断、购买和使用的药品。处方药是指凭执
下列()检测数据属于计量值数据。
甲午中日战争中,英勇牺牲的经远舰管带是()。
2,3,5,9,17,()。
根据下列资料,回答下列问题。2014年1—6月,美国外商平均每月对A省直接投资约()万美元。
根据"产品"表建立视图myview,视图中含有包括了"产品号"左边第一位是"1"的所有记录,正确的SQL命令是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)