首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、Do not let them stay in the team. B、They should feel guilty. C、They cannot help their students. D、It’s unnecessary to reward t
A、Do not let them stay in the team. B、They should feel guilty. C、They cannot help their students. D、It’s unnecessary to reward t
admin
2022-07-27
215
问题
W: The debate over whether students’ scores adequately reflect a teacher’s performance, has been raging for well over a decade. Now a new study has tracked more than two-and-a-half million students over two decades. It found that the quality of teachers can make a huge difference for a student’s academic performance. We welcome Dan, one of the three authors of the new study to join us. Professor, how do you determine it’s the teachers who made the difference?
M: We measure teacher quality by looking at the average impacts that teachers had on the students’ test scores.
For example, if a teacher can raise his or her students’ test scores year after year, we call that teacher a high-value-added teacher.
If not, then we call him or her an average- or low-value-added teacher. And then we ask questions like supposedly, if students got different value-added teacher, were they doing differently as adults? And we find remarkable impacts.
Students who were assigned to high-value-added teachers are more likely to do well in school and earn more in the future.
W: If we take your study at face value, do its conclusions risk simplifying what it is that makes a good teacher, limiting it to achievements on standardized tests?
M:
I think the main message of our study is that standardized test score impacts can be a useful input into evaluating teachers,
but by no means are we saying that test scores are the end-all and be-all of how teachers should be evaluated.
We think that they’re one aspect of what should factor into the formula.
W: But one thing that teacher unions generally have been keeping an eye on is school systems’ attempts to pay for performance, to try to create a formula around their students’ achievements that would reward them with cash. After your study, is that justified, do you think?
M: I think teachers who are high-value-added are having tremendous benefits for their students.
For example, we’ve calculated that an excellent teacher, a teacher who is in the top 5 percent, can generate about $250,000 or more of additional earnings for their students over their lives in a single classroom of about 28 students.
They’re providing a great service to the economy. Also, as I mentioned above, students of a high-value-added teacher are more likely to do well in school. Now, I think it makes sense to try to reward teachers who are doing extremely well. It’s important to recognize teachers who are having such great impacts. Whether the best policy to raise teacher value added is merit pay or better teacher training or some other sort of tool is less clear.
W: Could it also be concluded from your study that it ought to be easier to fire ineffective teachers?
M: Yes. I think so. Suppose you are managing a baseball team, and you’re trying to do as well as you can. You have players with different batting average. One approach you might take is raising the batting average of all the players you have.
But I think it also makes a lot of sense that, on occasion, you let some of the players with lower batting average go,
and get somebody else who might do better. Here, I think the stakes are even much bigger. We’re talking about the future of our children, rather than winning a baseball game.
So I think it does make sense to consider those policies seriously.
W: Professor, thanks for joining us.
M: Thank you. My pleasure.
1. What is a high-value-added teacher?
2. What does Dan think might be a factor of evaluating a teacher’s performance?
3. What might be a benefit of good teachers to their students?
4. What is Dan’s opinion towards ineffective teachers?
5. What can you learn from Dan’s research?
选项
A、Do not let them stay in the team.
B、They should feel guilty.
C、They cannot help their students.
D、It’s unnecessary to reward them.
答案
A
解析
本题问男士对低效率教师的看法。在访谈末,男士首先举出棒球队这个例子来证明解雇低效球员的合理性,继而将其类比至教育领域。他认为,教育关系到孩子的未来,更须谨慎对待(We’re talking about…make sense to consider those policies seriously),A项“不要让他们留在教师队伍里”与此说法相符,故选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0EjJ777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Giventhesizeofthegroup,asmallmeetingroomshouldbe________.
Familycaregiversofseniorsshouldbecognizantofstressasitrelatestotheirlovedones.Knowingthesignsanddetecting
AccordingtoDebbie,whydosomepeoplefailtoeatabalanceddiet?
A、Becauseitseffectmaylingerforalmost10hours.B、Becauseitdisturbsthewaypeoplefeelindaytime.C、Becauseitaccelera
A、Donotletthemstayintheteam.B、Theyshouldfeelguilty.C、Theycannothelptheirstudents.D、It’sunnecessarytorewardt
TheSecretsofLearningaNewLanguageIntroductionPeoplewanttoknowthesecretoflearninganewlanguage.
TheSecretsofLearningaNewLanguageIntroductionPeoplewanttoknowthesecretoflearninganewlanguage.
TheSecretsofLearningaNewLanguageIntroductionPeoplewanttoknowthesecretoflearninganewlanguage.
Languageisasetofverbalsymbolsthatareprimarilyauditory,butsecondwritten,nowinmorethan2,200【S1】_______________
(1)ThelibraryatWoodgrovePrimarySchoolhasbeenturnedintoa"Maker-Space".Afterregularlessonsendataround2p.m.,pu
随机试题
宏昌咨询公司在对公司战略及其发展途径、SWOT分析、战略失效等进行调查研究,分别选取了国内和国外的公司,相关信息如资料一、资料二和资料三所示。材料一巨丰公司是国内一家大型家用汽车生产企业,公司在历史上先后采取了若干影响巨大的决策,为企业
A.消食和胃,行气消痞B.养阴益胃,调中消痞C.温中健脾,和胃降逆D.补气健脾,升清降浊E.健脾益气,和胃降逆
1岁患儿,以发热2天伴频繁抽搐、吐奶入院。体检:T39℃,咽红,扁桃体1度肿大,前囟饱满。白细胞15.6×109/L,尿常规(一)。
下列属于节律异常的脉搏是()。
建设项目竣工环境保护验收时,对于评价监测结果,大气综合排放标准的值是按污染物的()来评价的。
下列关于基金份额持有人的说法,正确的有()。
(2013年)2011年9月8日,甲公司与乙公司订立合同,以每台30万元的价格购买20台货车。双方约定,甲公司应在乙公司交货后半年内付清全部货款,并以甲公司通过划拨方式取得的某国有建设用地使用权提供抵押担保。双方办理了抵押登记。2011年10月1
质量改进中“掌握现状”要调查的内容有()。
简述行政执行的原则。
监护人应当承担的职责包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)