首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
28
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal systems of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
主旨题。参见上述各题分析。文章主要是对比英美两国及其他一些国家(如法国)各自的审判制度的优缺点,因此最能概括这一主旨的就是D 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0GDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhenwastheAmericanFootballAssociationfounded?
Whichgame...issoldwell?【P1】______allowsgamerstoselectgameswithequal-caliberopponents?【P2】______isprobablyfright
RecentsurveysshowthatJapaneseyouthhavebecomea"MeGeneration"thatrejectstraditionalvalues."Around1980manyJap
Wherecantheexpression"lameduck"beheard?
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
Wherecantheexpression"lameduck"beheard?
Howcanforeign-traineddoctorsgetapprovedfromtheEducationalCommissiontocompletearesidencyintheU.S.?WhathaveAm
Whatiswrongwiththewoman’scurrentapartment?
随机试题
(非英语专业学生做)Iamoftenaskedtodescribetheexperienceofraisingachildwithadisability.Itislikethis.【61】youaregoi
接种后告知家长或监护人,受种者在接种后留在接种现场观察()
X线检查对骨折的重要意义是
下列有关汇兑、银行卡、票据凭证结算业务的说法中,正确的是()。
商业银行各查询用户的用户名及密码除本人使用外,还可以授权他人使用。()
下列关于各类理财产品所投资的资产的表述,正确的是()。
安徽省省会先在安庆,抗战爆发后,省会临时迁往立煌县,立煌县就是现今的()。
如图,AB是圆的直径,PA垂直圆所在的平面,C是圆上的点.若AB=2,AC=1,PA=1,求二面角C—PB—A的余弦值.
Love,success,happiness,familyandfreedom—howimportantarethesevaluestoyou?Hereisoneinterviewwhichexploresthefun
某事务从账户A转出资金并向账户B转入资金,此操作要么全做,要么全不做。为了保证该操作的完整,需要利用到事务性质中的_______性。
最新回复
(
0
)