首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
17
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal systems of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
主旨题。参见上述各题分析。文章主要是对比英美两国及其他一些国家(如法国)各自的审判制度的优缺点,因此最能概括这一主旨的就是D 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0GDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
RecentsurveysshowthatJapaneseyouthhavebecomea"MeGeneration"thatrejectstraditionalvalues."Around1980manyJap
Howmanyplanetsarethereinthesolarsystemrevolvingaroundthesun?
Overthepastfewyears,flyingincoachhasbecomeanincreasinglymiserableexperience.Legroomispracticallynonexistent.Pa
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Howcanforeign-traineddoctorsgetapprovedfromtheEducationalCommissiontocompletearesidencyintheUS?
Ontheheelsofitsrecentdecisiontocriminalizeconsumerswhoripsongsfromalbumstheyhavepurchasedtotheircomputers(o
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.Duringtherace,Emmacouldnevergetenoughsleepasshewasonlyabletod
Theexpression"stepbackintimeatleastahundredyears"(Para.2)isintendedtoconveytheideathatWhichofthefollowin
Morethan30,000driversandpassengerswhoseatinthefrontofthevehiclesarekilledorseriouslyinjuredeachyear.At
Morethan30000driversandpassengerswhositinthefrontofthevehiclesarekilledorseriouslyinjuredeachyear.Ataspe
随机试题
A.缺铁性贫血B.巨幼细胞性贫血C.自身免疫性溶血性贫血D.珠蛋白生成障碍性贫血男,22岁,贫血,黄疸,脾肿大。血红蛋白70g/L,白细胞5.5×109/L,网织红细胞计数0.09,Coombs试验阳性
血中铜减少及尿中铜上升时,可能患
以下关于性心理障碍描述正确的是
小脑扁桃体位置变异较大,可突入枕骨大孔,但不超过
A.手术切除B.挂线疗法C.注射硬化剂D.口服抗生素E.胶圈套扎术高位肛瘘主要的治疗方法是
病原与牛病毒性腹泻/黏膜病病毒的抗原性有交叉的疫病是
综合法制备注射用水的工艺流程正确的为
某500t的工程船舶在施工中发生意外伤亡事故,死亡2人,伤2人,直接经济损失200万元。经事故调查,认定为重大事故。问题:简述施工安全事故的处理程序。
对于行政机关作出的行政处罚,当事人要求听证的,应当在行政机关告知后()日内提出。
身份的特点有()。
最新回复
(
0
)