首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
34
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal systems of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
主旨题。参见上述各题分析。文章主要是对比英美两国及其他一些国家(如法国)各自的审判制度的优缺点,因此最能概括这一主旨的就是D 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0GDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
RecentsurveysshowthatJapaneseyouthhavebecomea"MeGeneration"thatrejectstraditionalvalues."Around1980manyJap
Overthepastfewyears,flyingincoachhasbecomeanincreasinglymiserableexperience.Legroomispracticallynonexistent.Pa
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.TheworstthingthathappenedtoEmmaduringtheAroundAloneracewasthat
Theexpression"stepbackintimeatleastahundredyears"(Para.2)isintendedtoconveytheideathatWhichofthefollowin
Ifthepopulationoftheearthgoesonincreasingatitscurrentrate,therewilleventuallynotbeenoughresourcesleftto
随机试题
男,55岁。右胸闷气3个月,胸痛15天,夜间重,查体:颜面及颈部,胸壁略肿胀,胸壁静脉曲张,腋下有一拇指大小的淋巴结,无压痛,活动尚好,心率110次/分,律整,右肺呼吸音消失。为明确诊断需要哪项检查()
子宫内膜的周期性变化不包括
铅当量的单位是
诊断牙槽突骨折最有力的证据是()
管理层次与管理跨度之间的关系是()。
李某户籍所在地为A市甲区,经常居住地为A市乙区。其到B市甲区出差,因酒后殴打他人,被B市甲区公安分局处以行政拘留10天,关押在位于B市乙区的市拘留所。若李某不服,欲提起行政诉讼,()有管辖权。
2001年10月,我国全面启动了行政审批制度改革工作。十多年来,国务院部门和各省区市大幅精简行政审批项目,经过多轮取消和调整,行政审批项目削减了近七成。但是,依旧存在的重审批轻监管、管理随意性大、权力滥用风险突出等问题,特别是日益凸显的“权力寻租”现象,引
下列关于法律实施和法律实现的表述,能够成立的是()。
Thevisualartsareaclassofartforms,includingpainting,sculpture,photography,andothersthatfocusesonthecreationo
Mostvolcanoesarequiet.Theyrest(36)______forhundredsofyears.Noonepaysmuchattentiontothem.MountSt.Helenswaso
最新回复
(
0
)