首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
20
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal systems of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
主旨题。参见上述各题分析。文章主要是对比英美两国及其他一些国家(如法国)各自的审判制度的优缺点,因此最能概括这一主旨的就是D 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0GDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
ThoughPaulisdisabled,hemanagedtomovearoundinthehouse.
RecentsurveysshowthatJapaneseyouthhavebecomea"MeGeneration"thatrejectstraditionalvalues."Around1980manyJap
Whatdoesthespeakersuggestthatthestudentsshoulddoduringtheterm?
A=BOOK1B=BOOK2C=BOOK3D=BOOK4Whichbook(s)say(s)that...theclimateaffectsthefuturesustainableagricultural
In1959theaverageAmericanfamilypaid$989forayear’ssupplyoffood.In1972thefamilypaid$1,311.Thatwasaprice
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Whatisthefirstjobthemanappliedforrightafterhisuniversitygraduation?Whatagegroupsjointhetour?
Thepassengerswillhavea15-minute______stopatBloomington.
随机试题
能反映黄疸程度的项目是
水泥的类别不同,使用范围也不同,以下( )水巧玲珑泥不适用于大体积混凝土工程。
下列选项中,属于验收批验收合格依据的有()。
铜锌锡合金条(按重量计:铜45%、锌15%、锡40%)
现金收购是指收购公司以现金购买目标公司的股票,以实现对目标公司的控制。()
下列所得,应按“特许权使用费所得”缴纳个人所得税的是()。
A公司是一家生产企业,其财务分析采用改进的管理用财务报表分析体系。该公司上年、今年改进的管理用财务报表相关历史数据如下:(单位:万元)A公司下年的目标权益净利率为25%。假设该公司下年保持今年的资本结构和税后利息率不变,净经营资产周转次数可提高到3次
在Excel工作表单元格中,输入()是错误的。
有一个谚语:直到我们失去了某件东西,我们才会彻底认识到它的价值。当朋友已经死去时我们常常才能珍惜朋友的爱,甚至比他生前更加珍惜。直至我们离开学校或大学,才开始了解教育给我们的无穷机会,而学校教育也已不再了。同样的,只有当人身体虚弱或生病时才会了解健康的可贵
下列说法中,不属于数据模型所描述的内容的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)