首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
admin
2022-10-09
33
问题
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of use" agreements would surely win. These legal thickets are designed to protect companies from litigious online shoppers and users of web services. Some firms require agreement, as when users are asked to click a box before creating an Apple ID. Other sites explain their policies without seeking customers’ explicit consent. Few consumers read these terms, let alone understand them. Because they involve no negotiation between customer and company, firms often insert language conferring broad protections to lower their risk of liability. But in a new twist, legal disclaimers designed to limit lawsuits are now unleashing litigation.
(2) A surge of lawsuits in America claims that companies’ online agreements violate consumers’ rights. Consumers are banding together in class actions against targets including Apple, Avis, Bed Bath& Beyond, Toys R Us and Facebook. The cases have a tinge of the bizarre, citing a law passed before companies even had websites. And the lawsuits accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits, a convoluted argument even by the standards of American jurisprudence. Nevertheless, the litigation could have broad implications for the firms involved and for future class actions.
(3) The suits seek to exploit the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago. This was intended to prevent companies that do business in the state from using contracts, notices or signs to limit consumer rights protected by law.
(4) Trial lawyers only recently began to use the TCCWNA to target online agreements. "All firms that seek to represent consumers are constantly mining different data fields for potential ways consumer rights are being violated, " explains Gary Lynch, of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, a law firm. James Bogan of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, which has defended companies in class actions, describes the use of the TCCWNA as "very creative". But class-action lawyers such as Mr. Lynch may have struck gold.
(5) The lawsuits vary, but generally include allegations that online terms violate consumers’ rights to seek damages as protected by New Jersey law and fail to explain which provisions cover New Jersey. Unusually in American law, plaintiffs need not show injury or loss in order to sue but merely prove violation of the TCCWNA. Moreover, the lawsuits are aimed not only at firms headquartered in New Jersey but all manner of companies that merely do business in the state. Gavin Rooney of Lowenstein Sandler, another law firm, counts about 40 TCCWNA cases in the recent surge. What is more, the TCCWNA entitles each successful plaintiff to at least $100 in damages, plus fees to lawyers and so on. If a website has millions of visitors, the costs to a company could be staggering.
(6) Whether the lawsuits will succeed is unclear. Whatever the outcome of individual claims, the barrage of litigation will probably prompt firms to adjust their online terms. "Don’t overreach." Mr. Rooney advises clients. For example, a company might no longer add words to terms-of-use agreements that seek to limit liability from gross negligence or fraud.
(7) That would be good news for consumers. But changes to terms of use do not always serve their interests. A growing number of firms, emboldened by favourable Supreme Court rulings, have adopted clauses that limit class-action suits. Consumers are instead restricted to resolving disputes individually, in arbitration. The TCCWNA cases may inspire more firms to add such caveats. That might limit frivolous suits. But consumers with grave complaints would be unable to sue, either. In the end lawsuits over restrictive contracts may make them more restrictive still. (本文选自 The Economist)
The act enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago was to________.
选项
A、help customers band together to take lawsuits
B、avoid argument by the standards of law
C、prevent customers’ rights from being violated
D、accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits
答案
C
解析
细节题。文章第三段第二句提到,法案旨在防止公司在该州利用合同、通知或标记来限制受法律保护的消费者权益。由此可知,该法案是为了保护消费者的应有权益而颁布的,故C为答案。A、B和D均不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0JkK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Doingaccurateassessments.B、Usingfancyvocabulary.C、Usingcomplexsentences.D、Promulgatinguntruths.A①对话最后,老师说到有效写作的关键是a
Canfamouspeople’ssupporttowardsinternationalaidorganizationsdrawpublicattentiontocharity?Thishasbeenintenselydi
TheValueofUniversityLifeWhenpeoplerecalltheiruniversitylife,mostofthemregarditasavaluableexperience.Plea
A、Hurtingotherpeople.B、Injuringyourself.C、Losingyourbelongings.D、Losingyourlife.A①对话中男士提到女士必须购买保险,因此女士问“如果我摔断腿会有赔偿吗”,
A.actionB.butC.distractedD.absurdE.analogiesF.pullG.copyH.authorsI.concentratedJ.appearedK.livelyL
HewasoneofNewcastle’smost_______medicalmen,aworldauthorityonheartdiseases.
RiteofPassageisagoodnovelbyanystandards;_____,itshouldrankhighonanylistofsciencefiction.
EarnYourParent’sTrust1.【T1】ofprivilegesthatyouwant【T1】______Thereasonwhyparentsdon’tgiveyouprivilegesKidsmayu
WhatCausesJetLagandHowtoAvoidIt1.Facts■alongflightaffects【T1】________【T1】_________■thenatur
WhatCausesJetLagandHowtoAvoidIt1.Facts■alongflightaffects【T1】________【T1】_________■thenatur
随机试题
用Excel可以创建各类图表。为了描述特定时间内各个项之间的差别情况,对各项进行比较,应该选择()。
RC串联的交流电路中,电容上的电压相位滞后电流相位。()
男性,30岁,突感上腹部剧痛,检查:血压130/80mmHg,脉搏110次/分,板样腹,肠鸣音消失。血红蛋白120g/L,血白细胞数8.0×109/L。以下提示病情危险的是
井筒施工根据()的不同,分为普通凿井法与特殊凿井法。
进境展览品在展览期间被人购买的()。“ATA单证册”在我国的适用范围包括()。
投资基金按收益凭证是否可赎回分为公司型基金和契约型基金。()
岸边集装箱装卸桥的两个重要工作性能参数是()。
改革开放三十年以来,我国社会福利行政体系动作方式不断发展,正在形成政府与社会合作的社会福利行政模式。这一模式的特点有()。
()被称为“西方油画之父”。
Therecordofthepasthalfcenturyhasestablished,Ithink,thetwogeneralprinciplesabouthumandisease.First,itisneces
最新回复
(
0
)