首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of
admin
2022-10-09
32
问题
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of use" agreements would surely win. These legal thickets are designed to protect companies from litigious online shoppers and users of web services. Some firms require agreement, as when users are asked to click a box before creating an Apple ID. Other sites explain their policies without seeking customers’ explicit consent. Few consumers read these terms, let alone understand them. Because they involve no negotiation between customer and company, firms often insert language conferring broad protections to lower their risk of liability. But in a new twist, legal disclaimers designed to limit lawsuits are now unleashing litigation.
(2) A surge of lawsuits in America claims that companies’ online agreements violate consumers’ rights. Consumers are banding together in class actions against targets including Apple, Avis, Bed Bath& Beyond, Toys R Us and Facebook. The cases have a tinge of the bizarre, citing a law passed before companies even had websites. And the lawsuits accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits, a convoluted argument even by the standards of American jurisprudence. Nevertheless, the litigation could have broad implications for the firms involved and for future class actions.
(3) The suits seek to exploit the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago. This was intended to prevent companies that do business in the state from using contracts, notices or signs to limit consumer rights protected by law.
(4) Trial lawyers only recently began to use the TCCWNA to target online agreements. "All firms that seek to represent consumers are constantly mining different data fields for potential ways consumer rights are being violated, " explains Gary Lynch, of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, a law firm. James Bogan of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, which has defended companies in class actions, describes the use of the TCCWNA as "very creative". But class-action lawyers such as Mr. Lynch may have struck gold.
(5) The lawsuits vary, but generally include allegations that online terms violate consumers’ rights to seek damages as protected by New Jersey law and fail to explain which provisions cover New Jersey. Unusually in American law, plaintiffs need not show injury or loss in order to sue but merely prove violation of the TCCWNA. Moreover, the lawsuits are aimed not only at firms headquartered in New Jersey but all manner of companies that merely do business in the state. Gavin Rooney of Lowenstein Sandler, another law firm, counts about 40 TCCWNA cases in the recent surge. What is more, the TCCWNA entitles each successful plaintiff to at least $100 in damages, plus fees to lawyers and so on. If a website has millions of visitors, the costs to a company could be staggering.
(6) Whether the lawsuits will succeed is unclear. Whatever the outcome of individual claims, the barrage of litigation will probably prompt firms to adjust their online terms. "Don’t overreach." Mr. Rooney advises clients. For example, a company might no longer add words to terms-of-use agreements that seek to limit liability from gross negligence or fraud.
(7) That would be good news for consumers. But changes to terms of use do not always serve their interests. A growing number of firms, emboldened by favourable Supreme Court rulings, have adopted clauses that limit class-action suits. Consumers are instead restricted to resolving disputes individually, in arbitration. The TCCWNA cases may inspire more firms to add such caveats. That might limit frivolous suits. But consumers with grave complaints would be unable to sue, either. In the end lawsuits over restrictive contracts may make them more restrictive still. (本文选自 The Economist)
The act enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago was to________.
选项
A、help customers band together to take lawsuits
B、avoid argument by the standards of law
C、prevent customers’ rights from being violated
D、accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits
答案
C
解析
细节题。文章第三段第二句提到,法案旨在防止公司在该州利用合同、通知或标记来限制受法律保护的消费者权益。由此可知,该法案是为了保护消费者的应有权益而颁布的,故C为答案。A、B和D均不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0JkK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingsentencesexpressesREQUEST?
ThefeverofluxurygoodshasnowspreadalloverChina.BuyinginternationalbrandssuchasLouisVuitton,ChanelandGuccihas
He_______roundthroughthesefiguresandtoldthemanagerwhathethoughtofthem.
Thegeneralmanagertoldhissecretarythathesufferedfromheartdisease,buthewouldnotadmititin_______.
Sometimesit’sgoodtostopforawhiletothinkaboutthepastand______thefuture.
PASSAGETHREEWhatisTfL’spresentaim?
Listentothefollowingpassage.Altogetherthepassagewillbereadtoyoufourtimes.Duringthefirstreading,whichwillbe
PASSAGEFOURWhydoeconomiststhinktheprofitopportunitiesarerare?
(1)TheBritishCourtofAppealhascutlibeldamagesawardedtoMcDonald’s,theworld’slargestfast—foodchain,againsttwope
A、Ithaslimitedopeninghours.B、Ithastoofewresources.C、Itgetstoocrowded.D、Itopenstoolate.A男士抱怨虽然resourcecentre资源
随机试题
聚合物的相对分子质量具有不均一,多分散性。()
患者牙痛,痛连头部,面颊发热,其齿喜冷而恶热,时流牙血,牙龈红肿,口气热臭,口干舌燥,舌红苔黄,脉滑数。治宜
肠外营养支持时,复方氨基酸的用量一般为
根据《消费者权益保护法》的有关规定,下列关于是否违反经营者义务,说法错误的是:
房屋用地调查与测绘以()为单元分户进行。
某人为中国公民,2008年3月份在中国境内取得工资收入1800元、年终奖12200元,其应缴纳的个人所得税为( )元。
以下关于短期劳动力需求的说法正确的有()。
需求可能是连续的,也可能是间断的,连续性采购物品的需求通常有以下四种表现形式:即趋势性、周期性波动、季节性变化和随机性变化。需求受许多未知因素的影响而发生的不规则的变化有哪种表现形式()。
金花银
A、 B、 C、 D、 A
最新回复
(
0
)