首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
admin
2015-08-29
33
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Mr.Obama’s Dilemma.
B、Universitie’s Rising Cost.
C、Universities’ Challenges.
D、Anger about College.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0KOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor【M1】______.communicationstylesappearto
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor【M1】______.communicationstylesappearto
WhichofthefollowinganimalsisNOTtheuniqueanimalofAustralia?
A、sarcasticB、indifferentC、nocommentD、optimisticC
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’sbeenwiththeFederalCommunicationsCommission’s
WhichofthefollowingCANNOTbeusedasanadverbial?
ThelikelycauseoftheincreasedratesofHIV/AIDSisthelackof______.
WhathavetheleadersofEuropeanUnionagreedtodo?
Greece’sthree-partycoalitionhasagreedto______.
随机试题
如果工作表标签过多,在屏幕上不能全部显示,则可以使用标签栏()的标签滚动按钮来滚动显示。
在加工尺寸精度和位置精度要求高的键槽时,最好分粗铣和精铣。
女性,65岁,因“上消化道大出血”就诊。上消化道造影见胃底部4cm圆形充盈缺损,边缘整齐,中间可见“脐样”龛影最合适的治疗方案是
治疗大肠杆菌脑膜炎首选抗生素为
固定资产简单再生产的物质补偿,通常采取()等形式。
甲公司2016—2017年有关投资资料如下:资料一:2016年1月1日,甲公司和乙公司分别出资400万元和100万元设立丁公司,丁公司成立当日实收资本为500万元,甲公司、乙公司的持股比例分别为80%和20%,甲公司控制丁公司,乙公司对丁公司有重大影响
下列各项中,符合房产税纳税义务发生时间规定的有()。
我国2001年的GDP约为1978年的( )已知2000年我国的GDP为89404亿元,那么我国1996年—1999年四年的GDP总量约为( )
“六三运动”
设向量组α1,α2,α3,α4线性无关,则向量组().
最新回复
(
0
)