首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
admin
2015-08-29
31
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Mr.Obama’s Dilemma.
B、Universitie’s Rising Cost.
C、Universities’ Challenges.
D、Anger about College.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0KOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor【M1】______.communicationstylesappearto
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor【M1】______.communicationstylesappearto
Whichofthefollowingwordsdoesnotbelongtotheopenclass?
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
WhichofthefollowingisNOToneoftheofficiallanguagesinNewZealand?
Whichofthefollowingworksbestrepresentthenationalspiritofthe18th-centuryEngland?
HowmanyschooldistrictsandtheNationalEducationAssociationcriticizethelaw?
Itisgenerallyagreedthat_____werethefirstEuropeanstoreachAustralia’sshores.
WhathavetheleadersofEuropeanUnionagreedtodo?
随机试题
学校应当关心爱护学生,对品行有缺点、学习有困难的学生应当耐心教育、帮助,不得歧视。这体现了对未成年人受教育权利的()
道家学派开创者是()
A、过滤除菌B、热压灭菌C、煮沸灭菌D、气体灭菌E、干热灭菌胰岛素注射液使用()。
企业签订的下列各项合同中,按照“技术合同”贴花的有()。
某工业企业有机修和供电两个辅助生产车间,2017年3月份机修车间待分配费用900万元,提供修理工时是450小时,其中基本生产车间耗用200小时,行政管理部门耗用150小时,供电车间耗用100小时,采用直接分配法,其费用分配率应是()。
在人类社会的发展史上,经历了三次科技革命,其标志为()。
图书馆有100本书,借阅者需要在图书上签名。已知这批书中有甲签名的33本、乙签名的44本、丙签名的55本,其中同时有甲、乙签名的29本,同时有乙、丙签名的36本,同时有甲、丙签名的25本。那么这批图书中最少有多少本没有被任何人借阅过?
如在一个实验中,对红光信号灯按A键,对绿光信号灯按B键,对蓝光信号灯按C键,对白光信号灯按D键,共四个刺激和四个对应的反应,那么记录到的反应时是()。
Readthearticlebelowabouttheneedforlanguagetrainingintheinternationalmarketplaceandthequestionsontheoppositep
A、No,Idon’t.B、Yes,Idon’t.C、No,Ido.D、Idon’tlikeher.A本题是反意疑问句,意为“你不喜欢你们的英语老师,是吗?”如果喜欢,那么回答应是“Yes,Ido.”意为“不,我喜欢。”如果不喜欢
最新回复
(
0
)