首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
admin
2022-02-18
42
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used and, in many cases, the only source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teacher’s performance, the rating must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what were learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the student’s level, professional behavior in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject.
Which statement is true?
选项
A、Student evaluations of teachers are popular because they are very accurate.
B、In student ratings, students should not be asked questions that require professional background.
C、Student ratings can be used under any circumstances.
D、All colleges are inclined to use student ratings to evaluate teachers.
答案
B
解析
判断对错题。A选项出现绝对性词汇very accurate。C选项出现绝对性词汇any,D选项出现绝对性词汇all,所以都不是答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0UQD777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
应是公共决策永恒追求的结果是()
在整个政策系统中居于核心地位的是()
“政策执行主体或因疲于应付具体事务,或担心目标群体的抵抗,或因自身私利受损等原因,导致行动迟缓、思想犹豫、心理矛盾,对政策执行持观望态度。”属于政策执行偏差中的()
对所选取的某一被试群体进行长期追踪研究,考察某些心理现象发生发展的规律。这种研究方法是()
为了发现儿童的潜能,了解其长处和发展倾向,通常采用的心理测验是()
A.Ouruniversitywillextendtheopeninghoursofthelibraryandtheclassroomstomeetthestudents’needsatthehighestpos
—Wouldyouliketocometoseeafdmwithmetonight?—loveto,________Ididn’tfinishmyhomeworkyet.
You________totowntoseethemovieyesterday.ItwillbeonTVtonight.
Amoment’sdrillingbythedentistmaymakeusnervousandupset.Manyofuscannotstandpain.Toavoidthepainofadrilling
Althoughsomeareassufferedfromseriousnaturaldisasters,thetotalgrainoutputwashigherthanthatoflastyear.
随机试题
在牙周膜中,哪种细胞能增殖成颌骨囊肿或牙源性肿瘤
甲与同学打赌,故意将一台旧电脑遗留在某出租车上,看是否有人送还。与此同时,甲通过电台广播悬赏,称捡到电脑并归还者,付给奖金500元。该出租汽车司机乙很快将该电脑送回,主张奖金时遭拒。下列哪一表述是正确的?(2012/3/4)
应纳税凭证是指在中国境内具有法律效力,受中国法律保护的凭证。包括()。
城市电力负荷预测中,采用()预测城市居民生活用电量的近、中期控制性标准。
机床特性代号中的“Q”代表()。
以下审计程序中,属于风险评估程序的有()。
计算机病毒的_______是指只有在满足其特定条件时才启动表现(破坏)模块。
执行下列程序段后,变量s的值是()。DimsAslong,xAsIntegers=0:x=1DoWbile(x<10)s=d一xx=x+2Loop
Wheredoesthisconversationmostprobablytakeplace?
Artcanbemadeofalmostanything,includingsubstances【M1】_______thathavenotbeenproducedandusedinages,a
最新回复
(
0
)