首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
admin
2022-02-18
83
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used and, in many cases, the only source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teacher’s performance, the rating must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what were learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the student’s level, professional behavior in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject.
Which statement is true?
选项
A、Student evaluations of teachers are popular because they are very accurate.
B、In student ratings, students should not be asked questions that require professional background.
C、Student ratings can be used under any circumstances.
D、All colleges are inclined to use student ratings to evaluate teachers.
答案
B
解析
判断对错题。A选项出现绝对性词汇very accurate。C选项出现绝对性词汇any,D选项出现绝对性词汇all,所以都不是答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0UQD777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
对所选取的某一被试群体进行长期追踪研究,考察某些心理现象发生发展的规律。这种研究方法是()
个体心理发展的年龄特征具有稳定性的重要表现是()
A.Ouruniversitywillextendtheopeninghoursofthelibraryandtheclassroomstomeetthestudents’needsatthehighestpos
Thestudentsofthisuniversitycomplainabouttrafficnoiseswhich________themwhentheyarehavingclasses.
A.Pleaseallowmetoproposeatoasttoyourhealth.B.Peoplewhoareoverconfidenttendtoneglecttheirdeficiencies.C.Liv
ItseemsstrangethatinthepasttenyearsMikeandImightjustaswellhavebeenindifferentworlds.
Becausetheyusuallyreceivethesamescoreonexaminations,therearedisagreementsasto________isthebetterstudent.
ShewassurprisedtofindalltheseCDsandshepickedoneupandsatdownonthebedandshestartedtoopenone.
Vitaminsareimportanttoourhealth.Differentvitaminsarefoundindifferentfoods,grains,vegetablesandfruits,fishandm
Youcannotdependonthepromise________hemakes;heisnottrustworthy.
随机试题
关于苯巴比妥的排泄,下列哪项是正确的:
采购人从某一特定供应商处采购货物、工程和服务的采购方式是()。
根据《标准施工招标文件》(2007版)的合同通用条件,发包人在收到承包人提交的现场签证报告后,审核确认或提出修改意见的最长时限是()。【2015年真题】
某矿井水仓掘进断面积12m2,岩石普氏系数f=6,采用光面爆破。关于该水仓周边眼施工技术要求的说法,错误的是()。
()才能开始进行账务处理。
下列有关由第三方保管或控制的存货,由于无法在存货盘点现场实施监盘,注册会计师拟实施的替代审计程序中,错误的是()。
某校三年级和四年级各有两个班,三年级一班比三年级二班多4人,四年级一班比四年级二班少5人,三年级比四年级少17人,那么三年级一班比四年级二班少________人.
【B1】【B7】
Protestersstagedademonstrationto
Tom’ssuccessinhiscareerwillbeagreat(satisfy)______tohisfamily.
最新回复
(
0
)