首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Blowing Hot and Cold Climate change may be slow and uncertain, but that is no excuse for inaction. One reason why uncertaint
Blowing Hot and Cold Climate change may be slow and uncertain, but that is no excuse for inaction. One reason why uncertaint
admin
2010-05-09
12
问题
Blowing Hot and Cold
Climate change may be slow and uncertain, but that is no excuse for inaction. One reason why uncertainty over climate change looks to be with us for a long time is that the oceans, which absorb carbon from the atmosphere, act as a time-delay mechanism. Their massive thermal inertia means that the climate system responds only very slowly, to changes in the composition of the atmosphere. Another complication arises from the relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2), the principal greenhouse gas (GHG), and sulphur dioxide (SO2), and a common pollutant. Efforts to reduce man-made emissions of GHGs by cutting down on fossil-fuel use will reduce emissions of both the gases. The reduction in CO2 will cut warming, but the concurrent (同时发生的) SO2 cut may mask that effect by contributing to the warming.
There are so many such fuzzy (模糊的) factors—ranging from aerosol particles to clouds to cosmic radiation—that we are likely to see disruptions of familiar climate patterns for many years without knowing why they are happening or what to do about them. Tom Wigley, a leading climate scientist and member of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), goes further. He argues in an excellent book published by the Aspen Institute, "US Policies on Climate Change: What Next?", that whatever policy changes governments pursue, scientific uncertainties will "make it difficult to detect the effects of such changes, probably for many decades."
As evidence, he points to the negligible short-to medium-term difference in temperature resulting from an array of emission "pathways" on which the world could choose to embark if it decided to tackle climate change. He plots various strategies for reducing GHGs that will lead in the next century to the stabilization of atmospheric concentrations of CO2 at 550 parts per million (ppm). That is roughly double the level which prevailed in pre-industrial times, and is often suggested by climate scientists as a reasonable target. But even by 2040, the temperature differences between the various options will still be tiny—and certainly within the magnitude of natural climatic variance. In short, in another four decades we will probably still not know if we have over-or under-shot.
Ignorance is not bliss
However, that does not mean we know nothing. We do know, for a start, that the "greenhouse effect" is real: without the heat-trapping effect of water vapor, CO2, methane and other naturally occurring GHGs, our planet would be a lifeless 30℃ or so colder. Some of these GHG emissions are captured and stored by "sinks", such as the oceans, forests and agricultural land, as part of nature’s carbon cycle.
We also know that since the industrial revolution began, mankind’s actions have contributed significantly to that greenhouse effect. Atmospheric concentrations of GHGs have risen from around 280ppm two centuries ago to around 370ppm today, thanks chiefly to mankind’s use of fossil fuels and, to a lesser degree, to deforestation and other land-use changes. Both surface temperatures and sea levels have been rising for some time.
There are good reasons to think temperatures will continue rising. The IPCC has estimated a likely range for that increase of 1.4℃-5.8℃ over the next century, although the lower end of that range is more likely. Since what matters is not just the absolute temperature level but the rate of change as well, it makes sense to try to slow down the increase.
The worry is that a rapid rise in temperatures would lead to climate changes that could be devastating for many (though not all) parts of the world. Central America, most of Africa, much of south Asia and northern China could all be hit by droughts, storms and floods and otherwise made miserable.
The colder parts of the world may benefit from warming, but they too face danger. One is the conceivable collapse of the Atlantic "conveyor belt", a system of currents that gives much of Europe its relatively mild climate; if temperatures climb too high, say scientists, the system may undergo radical changes that damage both Europe and America. That points to the biggest fear: warming may trigger irreversible changes that transform the earth into a largely uninhabitable environment.
Given that possibility, extremely remote though it is, it is no comfort to know that any attempts to stabilize atmospheric concentrations of GHGs at a particular level will take a very long time. Because of the oceans’ thermal inertia, explains Mr. Wigley, even once atmospheric concentrations of GHGs are stabilized, it will take decades or centuries for the climate to follow suit. And even then the sea level will continue to rise.
This is a vast challenge, and it is worth bearing in mind that mankind’s contribution to warming is the only factor that can be controlled. So the sooner we start drawing up a long-term strategy for climate change, the better.
A low-carbon world
That is why the long-term objective for climate policy must be a transition to a low-carbon energy system. Such a transition can be very gradual and need not necessarily lead to a world powered only by bicycles and windmills, for two reasons that are often overlooked.
One involves the precise form in which the carbon in the ground is distributed. According to Michael Grubb of the Carbon Trust, a British quasi-governmental body, the long-term problem is coal. In theory, we can burn all of the conventional oil and natural gas in the ground and still meet the most ambitious goals for tackling climate change. If we do that, we must ensure that the far greater amounts of carbon trapped as coal (and unconventional resources like tar sands) never enter the atmosphere.
The other reason, as scientists took care to point out, is that it is net emissions of CO2 that need to peak and decline. That leaves scope for the continued use of fossil fuels as the main source of modern energy if only some magical way can be found to capture and dispose of the associated CO2. Happily, scientists already have some magic in the works.
Miracles sometimes happen
Two decades ago, the world faced a similar dilemma: evidence of a hole in the ozone layer. Some inconclusive signs suggested that it was man-made, caused by the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). There was the distant threat of disaster, and the knowledge that a concerted global response was required. Industry was reluctant at first, yet with leadership from Britain and America the Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987. That deal has proved surprisingly successful. The manufacture of CFCs is nearly phased out, and there are already signs that the ozone layer is on the way to recovery.
This story holds several lessons for the admittedly far more complex climate problem. First, it is the rich world which has caused the problem and which must lead the way in solving it. Second, the poor world must agree to help, but is right to insist on being given time—as well as money and technology—to help it adjust. Third, industry holds the key: in the ozone-depletion story, it was only after DuPont and ICI broke ranks with the rest of the CFC manufacturers their a deal became possible.
The final lesson is the most important: that the uncertainty surrounding a threat such as climate change is no excuse for inaction. New scientific evidence shows that the threat from ozone depletion had been much deadlier than was thought at the time when the world decided to act.
In recent years, scientists have reported that some uncertain factors disrupt the climate change.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
依据文章第二段首句话“There are so many such fuzzy factors—ranging from aerosol particles to clouds to cosmic radiation—that we are likely to see disruptions of familiar climate patterns for many years without knowing why they are happening or what to do about them.”可知,多年来气候异常的原因还是个未知数,可能是由于空气中悬浮颗粒,抑或太空的辐射等诸多不明因素造成了全球变暖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Enhancethecontestsofforce.B、Changepeople’soldmentalhabits.C、Changepeople’sideologies.D、Persuademankindtolivew
A、Developmentofindustry.B、Healthylife.C、Thefutureofchildren.D、Cleanair.AAccordingtothepassage,whichofthefollow
A、Shehadagreattimeatthesummerschool.B、Shesufferedalotatthesummerschool.C、Shecouldn’tbeartostayonemoremin
Whatistheultimateeffectofwearingauniformontheindividual?Whatindustrycouldbemostdirectlyandseriouslyaffected
Theunderlinedword"address"inparagraph2isclosestinmeaningto"______".WhatgoalistheChineseleadershiptryingtor
Whatcowsconstituteshighpercentageinthetotalcowsbutcheredeachyear?WhywillAmericanswanttoexportbeeffromanimal
A、Beunabletobreathe.B、Beovercomebypressure.C、Becomespeechless.D、Bescaredbypressure.BWhatdoesthespeakermeanwhe
A、Thosewhoknowhowtoprogramcomputers.B、Thosewhogetspecialaidfromtheirteachers.C、Thosewhoareveryhardworking.D、
Earlyadmission.根据题干中的Harvard和thisyear定位到原文最后一段末句Earlyadmissionwillremainineffectinthecurrentacademicyear,whichisal
随机试题
咔唑比色法测罐头食品中果胶质时,可直接测得果胶含量。
依据威廉.大内的Z理论,J型管理模式下,雇员之间、雇员与雇主之间是一种局部关系。
在Excel2003中,下面属于单元格引用运算符的有______。
Iamgoingtomeettheteacher,butyou______withme.
67Ga炎症显像时,白细胞内含有一种丰富的蛋白,显像剂与之结合后随白细胞迁移至炎症部位浓集,这种蛋白是
A.局部症状B.后遗症状C.主要症状D.全身症状E.示病症状动物患病时所表现的体温升高、精神沉郁、食欲不振等症状属于
患儿,6岁。咳喘反复发作。症见面色苍白,气短懒言,语声低微,倦怠乏力,自汗怕冷,四肢不温。其治法是
小额零散税收和法律另有规定的应缴收入,经征收计算于收缴收入的当日汇总缴入国库单一账户。()
我找不到那丛梅树了,因为我来的不是时候。我是在初夏的一个下午,进入这片水边的花地。如果是寒意未减的早春,远远地就能看见它,那金黄的花色啊,曾怎样让一双冷寂的眼睛充满温情。那时的花园是沉睡着的、等待复苏的废墟,到处是冰硬光滑的旧年的枝条,而一树腊梅的开放,正
在被称为高福利国家“楷模”的瑞典,不工作的人所拿到的救济金与工资收入相差无几而且不用纳税,慷慨的病休工资意味着工人患病也能拿到90%的工资。尽管瑞典人是全欧洲中身体最健康的公民,可是雇员平均每年休病假的时间不下50天,几乎占一年工作时间的五分之一。下列陈述
最新回复
(
0
)